RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

with a hub/switch. Darren. From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Britton Anderson Sent: 08 August 2017 21:25 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version Anybody else

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 3:25 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version Anybody else running 1810Ws on 8.2 running into the multiple devices per port bug? https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCux78581 We are deploying 8540's now ru

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

; Nick >> >> >> ------ >> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv < >> WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Hunter Fuller < >> hf0...@uah.edu> >> *Sent:* Friday, August 4, 2017 4:59 PM

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

, if its > the actual value from AD i'd say your good to go. > > > Nick > > > -- > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv < > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of Hunter Fuller < > hf0...@uah.e

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

_ From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of Hunter Fuller Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 4:59 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version You're right, I had misread that. Upon reading it that w

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

You're right, I had misread that. Upon reading it that way, though, isn't that fine too? The person's device reports its MAC, and then ACS or any other RADIUS just responds with that MAC's owner's assigned PSK. If the device's MAC isn't known, we just respond with an empty or garbage PSK to preven

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I think your going to have the same problem with ACS as there is with ISE. The controller does not send the PSK the user used to the RADIUS server for verification/validation. Instead the RADIUS server will send back the PSK value the user/device should be using and the WLC does the verificat

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Yep - we use Cisco ACS, backed with AD. Should be able to just add another rule to our ruleset, then configure iPSK on the controllers. Then it would check the PSK against AD, as the machine password for the machine account. (We already make machine accounts for registered MACs of game consoles, et

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

On 1 Aug 2017, at 17:33, Ciesinski, Nick wrote: While WLC 8.5 did add IPSK it is probably safe to say its rather worthless for most at this time. For those who have used ISE if you watch the video on how they make IPSK work it isn’t feasible to give each of your users their own PSK key to conn

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

ERSITY syr.edu From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jake Snyder Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 11:24 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version One of the things as a par

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

.educause.edu" > on behalf of "lhbad...@syr.edu" > > Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" > > Date: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 6:04 AM > To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" > Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Versi

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

:55 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version Lee, I can only speak to my experience, and in the case of the x800 series, we were a first-customer-ship and had them in production in Aug 2016. I ran into a few bugs, mostly stuck radios, but with

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

USE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 7:57 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version With your beta controller how many access points and

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of James Helzerman Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 7:57 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version With your beta controller how many access points and concurrent

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

little bugs worked out. > > > > Jeff > > > > *From: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of James Helzerman > *Reply-To: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" EDUCAUSE.EDU> > *Date: *Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 3:39 P

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Date: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 3:39 PM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version I feel like we might be used as QA..anyone else? On Aug 1, 2017 6:32 PM, "Mccormick, Kevin" m

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ciesinski, Nick Sent: Wednesday, 2 August 2017 1:04 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version While WLC 8.5 did add IPSK it is probably safe to say its rather worthless for most at this time. For those who have used

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version I feel like we might be used as QA..anyone else? On Aug 1, 2017 6:32 PM, "Mccormick, Kevin" mailto:ke-mccorm...@wiu.edu>> wrote: They just released 8.2.160.0. They have not vetted the release

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I feel like we might be used as QA..anyone else? On Aug 1, 2017 6:32 PM, "Mccormick, Kevin" wrote: They just released 8.2.160.0. They have not vetted the release as being stable. They will recommend after enough downloads and not a lot of bug issues. Kevin McCormick

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

As others have mentioned about Cisco code, we need a good reason to goto .160. We dont have an x800 series other than 1810w. We have been bit a few times now with code stability. Our latest debacle going from .141 to .151 using pre-download all but bricked a controller. -Jimmy On Tue, Aug 1, 2

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

They just released 8.2.160.0. They have not vetted the release as being stable. They will recommend after enough downloads and not a lot of bug issues. Kevin McCormick Network Administrator University Technology -

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/wireless-lan-controller-software/200046-TAC-Recommended-AireOS.html#anc8 On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 5:00 PM Marcelo Maraboli wrote: > Hello all > > I wonder why CISCO keeps 8.2.151 as "suggested" and not 8.2.160 ?? > > just a precaution ? > > My Ci

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Hello all I wonder why CISCO keeps 8.2.151 as "suggested" and not 8.2.160 ?? just a precaution ? My Cisco partner is telling me to stay in 8.2.151 even if there is 8.5.x code our there. what's your opinion ? regards, On 7/31/17 4:11 PM, Paul Thompson wrote: .160 fixes some real world

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

t;mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version From the iPSK config guide at: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-5/b_Identity_PSK_Feature_Deployment_Guide.pdf "IPSK can be configured on any AAA serer that supports Cisc

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

y, 1 August 2017 at 8:10 pm To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version I’m interested here, greatly… but: - 8.5 will have to bake thoroughly for us. Not touching it until MR3 or beyond. Zero trust or faith in early WLC code an

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

Thanks, Jake. -Original Message- From: Jake Snyder [jsnyde...@gmail.com] Received: Tuesday, 01 Aug 2017, 9:35 To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU [WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version Lee, IPSK falls into base licensing as it is just

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

nstituent Group Listserv > [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jason Cook > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:13 AM > To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version > > Thanks, I am aware it’s any radius server so i

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

ubject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version Thanks, I am aware it’s any radius server so it seems I identified my issue a bit hastily./… or not at all ☺ It’s been a while since I played with an Aerohive AP but 3 years ago it was so easy to get this up and running on a single AP with different vla

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 11:51 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version From the iPSK config guide at: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/8-5/b_Identity_PSK_Feature_Deployment_Guide.pdf "IPSK can be configured on an

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

the back burner L >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Jason Cook >> >> Technology Services >> >> The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 >> >> Ph: +61 8 8313 4800 >> >> >> >> From

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

> The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005 > > Ph: +61 8 8313 4800 <+61%208%208313%204800> > > > > *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto: > WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Entwistle, Bruce > *Sent:* Tuesda

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Entwistle, Bruce Sent: Tuesday, 1 August 2017 4:16 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version I had seen the comments made by the group during the summer related to bugs and the 2800 APs, so as a precautionary measure we did

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

.160 fixes some real world SIP and 802.11r Fast Transition bugs, if you're using either of those features. I was told by a coworker that the engineering prereleases of it had helped with some real life Apple connectivity tics, but have less detail on specifics of that. On Mon, 31 Jul 2017,

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 11:26 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version Bruce, Was there anything that you were absolutely hitting, or are you doing the “just in case” thing here? Lee Badman | Network

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

SS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version We completed the upgrade from 8.2.151.0 to 8.2.160.0 this morning. The primary reason for the upgrade was the identified bugs related to the 2800 APs. Bruce Entwistle Network Manager University of Redlands From: The EDUCAUSE Wi

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

151 here as well- is a bit frustrating that 160 just came out as we’re in our “freeze” period now for making changes, pre-semester. Other than the typical laundry list of cryptic bugs corrected, does anyone know if 160 addresses any real-world, commonly impactful 3800-related bugs? Lee Badman |

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

We completed the upgrade from 8.2.151.0 to 8.2.160.0 this morning. The primary reason for the upgrade was the identified bugs related to the 2800 APs. Bruce Entwistle Network Manager University of Redlands From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LIST

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco Code Version

I would go with 8.2.160, especially if you have the new-series x800 WAPs. Jeff From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" on behalf of James Helzerman Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Date: Monday, July 31, 2017 at 10:57 AM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" Subject: [WI