Re: [WISPA] WISPA Wooden Nickels

Just the ones we turn in. Mark > On Oct 15, 2016, at 9:21 AM, Jim Patient wrote: > > Does WISPA pay Rio for unused ones or just the ones that get turned in at the > bar? > > jpati...@linktechs.net > www.LinkTechs.net | www.TowerCoverage.com > Phone: 314-735-0270 FAX: 636-660-1534 > Pho

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 Ghz License

Faisal has good advice here. The licensed gear is marginally more expensive but just works. No worries about interference and you free up the unlicensed spectrum for what makes you $$$ - point to multipoint. You (probably) can't buy licensed spectrum for PtMP, but you can for point to point

Re: [WISPA] Charge for remote thermostat?

We have a $5/mo vacation hold plan with no internet, and a $10/mo vacation monitoring plan that provides 256k.It’s enough for the guys who want to look at a photo once in a while or check an alarm system / thermostat. We limit either plan to less than 6 months/year - you have to be on a ‘nor

Re: [WISPA] Facebook ads

Works very well for us for a lot of things: https://www.facebook.com/amplexinternet/ <https://www.facebook.com/amplexinternet/> Mark Radabaugh Amplex 22690 Pemberville Rd Luckey, OH 43443 419-837-5015 x1021 419-261-5996 (cell) m...@amplex.net > On Jan 19, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Terry Dar

Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison

We don’t see issues with F/B interference with 450 very often in 5.7 but it’s much more significant in 3.65. Typical issue will be poor SNR for the close-in customers even though they have excellent signal. Mark > On Mar 21, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Jon Langeler wrote: > > It can happen. I recommen

Re: [WISPA] Harness

overalls. Mark. Mark Radabaugh Amplex 22690 Pemberville Rd Luckey, OH 43443 419-837-5015 x1021 419-261-5996 (cell) m...@amplex.net > On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:18 PM, Nick Bright wrote: > > On 4/20/2017 12:49 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> If you don't get a DBI exofit you bought the wr

Re: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

FAA follows the spirit of the law it should not generally effect us - but we don’t know what they are going to do since they have not started yet. Mark Radabaugh WISPA FCC Committee Chair fcc_ch...@wispa.org 419-261-5996 > On May 5, 2017, at 12:05 AM, David Williamson > wrote: > >

Re: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question

Short addition… Steve Coran has this (theoretically pending) NPRM on his watch list. I asked Ari and the Legislative group to see what is happening in Congress with CCA’s efforts. If they are making any traction WISPA can pile on if the CCA’s plan works for us. Mark Mark Radabaugh WISPA

[WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

would be significant opposition to using the spectrum for Point to Multipoint. Mark Mark Radabaugh WISPA FCC Committee Chair 419-261-5996 ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

x> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > From: "Mark Radabaugh" > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Friday, June 2

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > From: "Mark Radabaugh" > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 6:01:57 PM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part &g

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

Field Technician > Virginia Broadband LLC. > (540)-829-1700 > > > > -Original Message- > From: mike.l...@gmail.com > Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 7:35pm > To: "WISPA General List" > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

> On Jun 5, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > > On 6/5/17 4:04 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: >> >> It’s curious that you would give up access to potentially >1000Mhz of >> clean mid-band spectrum because you don’t want your competitors using >> it.

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

What are you proposing replace unlicensed spectrum with? CBRS? I don’t think you are going to like the results. Straight up licensed auctions? Do you really have the money to compete with the big 4 in that? I’m not sure what WISPA is supposed to do for you here. You don’t like Part 15

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

make it very difficult to use for PTMP.I don't believe we should be shutting down anything that can get us more PTMP space but should instead be supporting proposals that protect what we have while finding additional ways to reach customers. Mark Radabaugh Amplex 22690 Pemberville Rd

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

At this point there is no petition for rulemaking, or even a draft. AFAIK at this point it’s still at the stage of figuring out who the incumbents in 5900-7200Mhz spectrum are and what their positions are likely to be. If the proposal even gets off the ground moving from this point to actual

Re: [WISPA] [Wisp] Sign onto EFF's comment to the FCC on their net neutrality proposal

but believe this can best be achieved without the overhead of Title II and the regulatory uncertainty that comes with Title II. Mark Radabaugh WISPA FCC Committee Chair fcc_ch...@wispa.org 419-261-5996 > On Jul 6, 2017, at 7:52 PM, mike.lyon--- via WISP wrote: > > Forwarded on fro

Re: [WISPA] [Wisp] Sign onto EFF's comment to the FCC on their net neutrality proposal

oking forward to draft. > > In the mean time could you elaborate on "the overhead of Title II and the > regulatory uncertainty that comes with Title II". > > Thanks > Mark > > > - On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:41 PM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote: > &

Re: [WISPA] question of the day

Kind of an open ended question - do you have any more specifics of what they are looking for? I think you already know most of this - access to capital, spectrum, competent employees and management, vertical assets, and bandwidth, all at reasonable rates are the keys to a profitable fixed wirel

Re: [WISPA] question of the day

like them are getting into the LTE space which does have an > impact on our customer base. > > I guess my question should have been…. “What did it take you to establish a > profitable Fixed Wireless system and how have you been able to compete with > AT&T’s of the world?”

[WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

, Chair of WISPA’s Legislative Committee, jc...@wispa.org <mailto:jc...@wispa.org> · Mark Radabaugh, Chair of WISPA’s FCC Committee, m...@amplex.net <mailto:m...@amplex.net> Mark Radabaugh WISPA FCC Committee Chair fcc_ch...@wispa.org 419-261-5996 __

Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

u have an opinion but is > your protest really doing anything. > > On Dec 6, 2017, at 09:02, Mark Radabaugh <mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote: > >> >> >> You all screamed a month ago when the CBRS order came out and wanted to do >> something

Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

ireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> > [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] On > Behalf Of Mark Radabaugh > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2017 4:11 PM > To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> > Sub

Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

aw-suit. Protests would only help him laugh. > > On 2017-12-06 02:12 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: >> Too many mailing lists, and it doesn’t help that most of mine sort into the >> same folder so it’s hard to tell which list a given posting is on. >> >> I sent it to memb

Re: [WISPA] CBRS Spectrum - PLEASE DO THIS TODAY, TOMORROW, and every day next week. It's time to ACT to save CBRS spectrum

> On Dec 6, 2017, at 7:02 PM, Jan Van Kort wrote: > > I think you're dreaming about republican appointees. The only thing they > respect is the gratuities from big-business. Bribes used to be illegal, > maybe if we all donate to wispa, wispa could bend their ear by donating to > their favo

[WISPA] CBRS Operator Member Survey

To prepare for comments on the CBRS NPRM that is due later this month we would like our members to complete a survey asking questions on your current use of 3.65 spectrum and your plans for CBRS. The survey was sent to the WISPA principals email list today with the subject “WISPA CBRS Operator

[WISPA] Due today - CBRS Operator Member Survey

To prepare for comments on the CBRS NPRM that is due later this month we would like our members to complete a survey asking questions on your current use of 3.65 spectrum and your plans for CBRS. The survey was sent to your companies primary contact email address last week, Thursday morning, w

[WISPA] Upcoming FCC Network Neutrality vote and media information

On Thursday the FCC will be voting on repealing the 2015 Network Neutrality order.    While I know some of you agree with this, and others do not, you may receive inquiries from local or national media outlets. If you receive an inquiry from a reporter, and you feel like you want to respond,

[WISPA] Network Neutrality talking points

For your use, re-posted from last week: *Talking Points for WISPA Members on “Net Neutrality” and “Internet Freedom” * December 2017 *Overview for WISPA Members * ** ·These talking points are _not_ intended to be used proactively. WISPA is not taking a proactive role in advocacy on this i

Re: [WISPA] Two days left! CBRS comments are due Thursday, December 28, 2017. GET THIS DONE TODAY (before drinking all the eggnog)!

below. Please take 30 minutes today and put together a letter to the FCC on CBRS.  If you need assistance, or want help reviewing a draft, contact me, Mark Radabaugh, or Steve Coran off list and we’ll help you. We have also developed a website that will enable you to see the difference between

[WISPA] Last day to file CBRS Comments is today. Please file if you have not already done so.

below. Please take 30 minutes today and put together a letter to the FCC on CBRS.  If you need assistance, or want help reviewing a draft, contact me, Mark Radabaugh, or Steve Coran off list and we’ll help you. We have also developed a website that will enable you to see the difference between

Re: [WISPA] Why not offer gigabit internet?

My company does offer it but the concerns I had are: What do you do with the customer who actually uses it continuously? Do you put caps on usage (and what does that do to your ability to sell it)? Will it hurt you pricing margin for business customers? How do you justify the price differen

Re: [WISPA] 900MHz band

proving that the interference exceeds the OOB limits that the licenses are based on. The licensed user gets protection to a specified level, but nothing more. Mark Mark Radabaugh WISPA FCC Committee Chair fcc_ch...@wispa.org 419-261-5996 > On Jun 21, 2018, at 2:57 PM, Steve Barnes wr

[WISPA] Draft Items for August 1 FCC Meeting

tion yourself to receive this funding, or prevent your competitors from getting it and overbuilding you. Mark Mark Radabaugh WISPA Policy Committee Chair 419-261-5996 > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Coran, Steve via PolicyCommittee" > Subject: [PolicyCommittee] Dr

Re: [WISPA] Draft Items for August 1 FCC Meeting

t; > > > > > > Original message > > From: James Wilson via Wireless <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> > > Date: 7/21/19 9:55 PM (GMT-05:00) > > To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> > > Subject: Re: [

Re: [WISPA] Draft Items for August 1 FCC Meeting

e did a webinar last week on this topic, hope to post for members soon. > > > > Original message > From: James Wilson via Wireless <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> > Date: 7/21/19 9:55 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: WISPA General List mailto:wireless@wispa.or

[WISPA] AT&T getting rid of DirectTV?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/at-t-explores-parting-ways-with-directv-11568841544?mod=hp_lead_pos1 Interesting, and I wonder what this implies for AT&T and fixed wireless. Direct TV is the workf