<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
You bring up an interesting point, comparing to GSM..
The problem is, in a democracy full of special interests, how does one
determine fairly what that compat
April 21, 2006 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
It's quite unfortunate IMO but I've concluded that this is a typically
American problem. In America the courts broke up the Bell system thinking
that it'd be better for the average American to have local phone compan
Marlon, I think I can appreciate most everything you've said. I can only
add to each of your points, while accepting your input, why I think that
your (and my) life would be better if we had some more constructive
requirements in the wisp market than "anything that fits the transmit mask".
It
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Comroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Rich, with all due respect, your idea has a REALLY big flaw in it.
I love debate. I&#
ven though BETA was better?
Better standards strategy! Sony learned their lessons well and did a
complete 180 on the standards strategy for 8mm. A well thought out standard
helps everyone.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181" <[EMAIL PROTECT
Marlon K. wrote:
It's funny. I thought that getting the local businesses on broadband
would help me sell more of it. People would use it at work and want
it at home too right? Wrong. They just do all of their stuff at work
and sometimes cancel even the dialup!
This is because people do
m: "Rich Comroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
It's quite unfortunate IMO but I've concluded that this is a typically
American problem. In America the courts broke up the Bell
it may be most ethical for evolutionists.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: [W
contention based 3650
gear, and use that spectrum!
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 5:31
Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick:
I disagree that the market is (direct
- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Leary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I&
ast dot net
Fast Internet, NO WIRES!
-
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 3:54 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
>
> Patrick:
>
Patrick:
I posit that the LACK of any significant consensus from the industry on
3650, when there WAS a clearly indicated desire on the part of the FCC to
try out some form of mandated sharing, bolsters the case that the
simplicity of Part 15 / UNII rules makes for more innovation.
See... the
Patrick Leary wrote:
Steve, I simply refuse to accept that the current rules are sacrosanct,
there are not, and the proposed rules for 3650MHz bolter my case. In
3650MHz, the FCC made strong and specific reference that they well might not
accept products that they believed were designed not to,
.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: Steve Stroh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick:
Yup - agree to disagree, and remaining civil in the discussion.
Th
Patrick:
Yup - agree to disagree, and remaining civil in the discussion.
The basic flaw in your perspective is that the current US license-exempt
bands are intended for communications use. They're not- their PRIMARY
allocation... WAY back, is for Industrial, Scientific, and Medical use,
so lice
.
Patrick Leary
AVP Marketing
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: Steve Stroh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick:
I disagree that the
Patrick:
I disagree that the market is (directly) rewarding "survival of the
nastiest" - it's rewarding systems that are designed to survive in a mixed
environment. If that behavior is perceived as "nasty" by systems that are
less robust, oh well.
But there's a tradeoff - systems whose primar
still think that such rules have the best chance of
bringing about a positive revolution in UL BWA.
Regards,
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 5:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Patrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I'd prefer to give you the full story.
First,...so, is A
: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 9:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
So these are just the licensed frequencies that will get mobile WIMAX.
There will be no unlicensed WIMAX mobile or fixed any time in 2006, is
that correct?
One of the reasons I ask this is there is
So these are just the licensed frequencies that will get mobile WIMAX.
There will be no unlicensed WIMAX mobile or fixed any time in 2006, is
that correct?
One of the reasons I ask this is there is a group that claims they will
be rolling out unlicensed mobile WIMAX here along the Oregon Coas
8
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
-Original Message-
From: George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 10:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
That was a great answer Patrick.
You should post more often. This is the information all wisp
That was a great answer Patrick.
You should post more often. This is the information all wisps crave.
What frequency is the mobile WIMAX?
And what is the expected release dates.
Thanks again
George
Patrick Leary wrote:
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
ques
onage: 650.641.1243
From: Dylan Oliver
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006
11:19 AM
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX
update
Patrick:
Wow - this is by far the most enlightening piece I've ever read on the WiMax
market. Thanks a lot!
So who re
1.1243
-Original Message-
From: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:19 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
GREAT post Patrick! Thank you so very much for it. This is one of the
reasons why I'm so pr
Patrick:
Wow - this is by far the most enlightening piece I've ever read on the WiMax market. Thanks a lot!
So who really cares about WiMax for backhaul? So what if I can build
links with ends from different vendors? Won't proprietary protocols win
(technically) if they aren't "limited" by requir
ent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I'd prefer to give you the full story.
First,...so, is Alvarion building UL WiMAX? Of course, and I personally
see
lots of potential fo
Sorry, I meant to say "NOT scrambling to build residential UL WiMAX CPE."
- Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Leary
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:50 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] UL WiMAX update
Well George, ready for long answer that may
Well George, ready for long answer that may not actually answer your
question? I'd prefer to give you the full story.
First,...so, is Alvarion building UL WiMAX? Of course, and I personally see
lots of potential for it. When will it come? A few things are in line first,
so there is no firm date b
30 matches
Mail list logo
