On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:45:40 -0700, Chris wrote:
Dynamic Text Replacement
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/dynatext/
Most sites that replace text with images do so using hand-made images,
which isnt so terrible when there are a set number of headings, but it
quickly becomes unmanageable on
Marc Greenstock wrote:
It is probably best to actually save the images out after the first load so
the images are permanently as part of the file system. In the event that you
need to change the text simply delete the images and let them reload.
This is exactly what I did for a site I built. I
Sorry to be a wet blanket guys but this has little or no bearing on
web standards.
From: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
The mail list does not cover:
* Non-Web Standards related issues and support
* Discussion of server-side
Richard Rutter wrote:
If you want something doing...
A script which uses the DOM to automatically underline the letter of a
link text which matches its accesskey:
http://clagnut.com/sandbox/dynamic-accesskeys/
Any use? In some ways this could be using JavaScript to increase
accessibility, or
On 16 Jun 2004, at 06:19, Bert Doorn wrote:
opinion
Whatever the technique, using images for headings is, to me, backward,
pixel perfect, print thinking.
[...]
Perhaps I am a lone voice in the desert, but why go back to 1990's
style
websites when we have CSS?
Because if we really on styling
Hey List,
I am currently developing a little software package which will help you
manage your CSS and your bandwidth.
What it does is it will compress your CSS.
Its not very intelligent so it doesnt do anything really special.
All it will do is Load a CSS file - Parse the file.
It will then
Sounds
interesting, but...I can do all that already withsome find/replaces, so
I'm
not
sure if people will be willing to pay for it (even if $5 is such a low
price).
Or are
you planning to have your tool parse the actual CSS, rather than
simply
looking for occurences of comments, spaces,
Hi all,
The WSG has a core team who are made up from founding members and City
meeting organisers. This core team is involved in overall directions and
decision-making to do with the WSG. They are also around to help keep the
list on topic, as Peter and I cannot be available 24 hours a day.
The
Hey Patrick,
Yeah the program will parse the actuall CSS and list all the SELECTORS,
the PROPERTIES and VALUES (And Comments).
It works by parsing each character.
The algorithm took me an hour or two just to write up.
It wasn't simple.
That is why you cannot use this software with non
Hi Chris,
I am still working on the Parsing algorigthm.
If you are on Windows, you can use our free CSS parser. Here is the link:
http://xstandard.com/page.asp?p=E784B605-2413-49B1-B17C-20A634CB0150
Regards,
-Vlad
XStandard Development Team
XHTML Strict / 1.1 WYSIWYG editor
http://xstandard.com
Hey Vlad,
Thanks for the link
I am downloading it now.
Although I already fully coded my algorithm and its working 100% fine
so far...
I could have saved myself an hour or two :S
Is the file a object for VB?
thanks!
Vlad Alexander (XStandard) wrote:
Hi Chris,
I am
BTW - IF there are any programs out there that do this - please let
me know!
I think I can do most, if not all of that with TopStyle Stylesweepers.
You can save the parameters ton run them again - I have a
super-compressed stylesweeper, and an ultra-readable one.
--
Kay Smoljak
I agree I think Topstyle is the program you should have a go to try and
beat mate.
Although its pretty hard, it has a cult following
the guys talented
And Macromedia was focrced to put heaps of focus on Dreamweavers CSS
capabilites cuz TS is the CSS GOD.
Its pretty hard to beat.
You prepared
Im not trying to beat anything.
I just want a simple program, that hopefully can be free.
which will simply compress your CSS code.
I have heard a lot of good things about TopStyle.
Although I usually like coding in an environment which doesn't
interfere with my coding. (I dont know if it
Count
me in, Chris. I use TSP3.1, and it's good. But I'm open to ideas. Mail me
details and schedules off list.
Mike
PepperAccessible Web Developerwww.seowebsitepromotion.comwww.gawds.org
On 15/06/2004, at 4:21 PM, Jake Badger wrote:
From having a quick play with those scrollers they seem to do exactly
what you
want when both CSS and JavaScript are off but not when just one is
off. I guess
the question is how many people actualy browse like that (one on/ one
off).
Lots is my
Is this the right place to
ask?
I have a _javascript_ on my page at http://marie-str.com to make the fairy at the
bottom of my page float down with the page - a watermark.
Here's the problem - she works perfectly in
Opera 7.5 - drops down to the extreme left in Firefox .8, and just sits
Well, I'm with Mike Kear on this one one hundred percent...
Agreeing on standards is like McDonald's and Burger King agreeing to
have the same type of french fry recipe. Where is the secret sauce that
makes you want to go their restaurant? And where is the reason why I
should use one browser
This may be good news for standards.
http://www.itweek.co.uk/News/1155868 :
Ubizen has advised computer users to switch to alternative web
browsers like Netscape or Mozilla for the moment.
Also at:
http://www.ubizen.com/c_about_us/2_public_relations/2004/040611_e.html
Now the question is will
Ubizen has advised computer users to switch to alternative web
browsers like Netscape or Mozilla for the moment.
Now the question is will anybody switch?
Wow. Wouldn't it be great if people did?
I think what would be better than individuals switching would be for
computer manufacturers to
and I am probably missing something really simple;
This is the page in question:
http://nrotc.mainemaritime.edu/goals.html
(css in separate file)
This Page Is Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict and before jigsaw went down, the CSS
was having no errors as well. It also passes as Section 508 (which are the
Hi
Just a quick question.
How good is IE4/win standards wise? Are there any particular problems
that are widely known with regards to CSS etc?
Thanks,
Hanni
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Patrick Griffiths wrote:
I think what would be better than individuals switching would be for
computer manufacturers to pre-install Mozilla or Opera on PC's.
It would be nice if Opera would do this. I don't see it as a possibility
with Mozilla for a very simple reason: money. Another possibility,
I wouldnt bother with Netscape 7.1 Valdiation.
Rebuild your site somewhat so it works in Opera IE Mozilla 1.6+
Netscape hasnt got long left till it passes on.
Camz.
www.t94xr.net.nz
- Original Message -
From: Veine K Vikberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June
Doesn't look like it, as Mozilla is taking over a whole chunk of the
browser market, however, there will always be a large population on
Netscape as the university/college systems are still in Netscape, some as
far back as 4.x.
Still, I would like to get this one to function but am stuck to get
Hanni
My opinion is don't bother, it's not worth the effort. Users still with
this browser should be pushed to upgrade for various reasons, not just
for the benefits of standards support they bring.
Any user who approaches me complaining about a site that doesn't work in
IE4, NN4, Opera 5 or
Hi Hanni,
How good is IE4/win standards wise? Are there any particular problems
that are widely known with regards to CSS etc?
The first result from
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ie4+css+bugs
RichInStyle.com CSS bug table
http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/table.html
RichInStyle.com also
True,
at my uni they have IE6.0 and Netscape 7.1
I actually enjoy using the netscape browser its very good!
Veine K Vikberg wrote:
Doesn't look like it, as Mozilla is taking over a whole chunk of the
browser market, however, there will always be a large population on
Netscape as the
On Thursday, June 17, 2004, at 06:36 AM, Veine K Vikberg wrote:
My main problem is the blasted unordered list where the bullets
disappear in IE, and the picture going off to the left in Opera.
I don't see any css declaration at all for the ul; add one and you can
control bullet position. For
Looks fine on Safari and Firefox. Things are a little out of alignment
in Opera 6.03 / Mac.
Don't really see the problems you described.
Lucian
On Jun 17, 2004, at 4:36 AM, Veine K Vikberg wrote:
http://nrotc.mainemaritime.edu/goals.html
*
The
Actually, I switched the layout around so the picture is not floated right
instead of left. And as for the ul I added it on the p declaration within
that div, to no avail.
A friend pointed out that IE has a problem with the bullets, as they are
treated as images, and got left aligned as well
I agree...definitely not a clean URL and it would be a major headache.
Sam, OS X doesn't use file extensions in that manner. They're there for compatibility's sake when in mixed environments. The OS still figures out the type from the metadata in the file, it just requires extensions to ensure
Hi
I remember reading about a syntax that when applied to an element would
force all the elements contained within that element to inherit the
properties of the container element.
Is there really such a syntax? if so, how do I write it?
I tried googling for it, but all I got were pages
In IE for Mac or PC the middle div gets bumped around:
www.yogavillage.net
I have set all the widths accordingly and the middle div gets a min-width of 430 px
which is wider than the
center graphic.
Any ideas? i have a feeling that this is an IE hack but I have no idea which one.
thanks,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 21:20:03 -0400, Veine K Vikberg wrote:
As for the Safari, I could use a ss of that if you can make me one, as I
have no clue to how much etc.
Hello Veine,
FYI - the splendid Daniel Vine offers free screen shots on iCapture:
http://www.danvine.com/icapture/
This for Safari
Hi all,
Long time member, very few posts, but have enjoyed reading all of
yours, and am grateful for all the insights. Thanks also to Russ for
his presentations which have got me out of numerous sticky situations!
I would appreciate feedback on the following (personal) site:
On Thursday, June 17, 2004, at 02:40 PM, Roger Williams wrote:
In IE for Mac or PC the middle div gets bumped around:
www.yogavillage.net
I have set all the widths accordingly and the middle div gets a
min-width of 430 px which is wider than the
center graphic.
Any ideas? i have a feeling that
37 matches
Mail list logo
