Hi
Not wanting to hijack the PNG thread, so I've altered the subject.
I understand the issues involve in huge migrations, it's not that easy..
especially if your systems have a vested interest in some piece of obsolete
technology.. but there are two things that strike me as odd here -
- IE7
Another problem is that there are organisations which still have large
investments in a legacy O/S (MS included) on which IE7/8 cannot run.
So it's not just a time issue for downloading the browser, but upgrading
to a new O/S.
On Mon, August 4, 2008 8:03 am, James Ellis wrote:
Hi
Not wanting
A dl is a LIST of definition terms and their description.
dt is a definition term to be described (not title).
dd is description of the definition term.
See http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html#h-10.3
On Mon, August 4, 2008 4:20 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was under
my cousin is visiting from oregon and he has the new att iphone. we
looked at my web site on it and i must say that i was really
surprised. it looked just like it does on a computer.
the xhtml and css validate. i used no special css for mobile devices.
i'm sure that i have a semantically
Not wanting to hijack the PNG thread, so I've altered the subject.
I understand the issues involve in huge migrations, it's not
that easy..
At the risk of starting a war, it doesn't sound like you do understand.
Before even starting to plan a migration, any decent corporation, of
whatever
Dwain said: it looked just like it does on a computer.
What did you expect Dwain..lolol
What does look awesome is my Wordpress on Plasma 42 on a lounge wall
*OMG!
Kate
- Original Message -
From: dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: web standards group wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent:
On 8/4/08, kate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dwain said: it looked just like it does on a computer.
What did you expect Dwain..lolol
i really didn't know what to expect, that's why it was such a
surprise. i don't know, maybe i expected the css not to work and the
page would display would
Hi Mike
No worries, not interested in war, but I do understand.
I guess the one big answer about why change is that, over time, sites will
just stop working to their full efficiency. There is also the big one called
security (or lack of). I hope, but I don't think, that this fabled desktop
Hi Dwain,
I guess yea, it would have looked messy without the CSS...never thought of
that.
I hav'nt looked on my Samsung but I did see mine on my old Nokia. which I
thought was really cool then. I think you can look at any Web now on a cell
phone.
I also got word from BT this morning
To clarify, when people use a definition list for something other than
actual definitions and terms, they usually use the dt's and dd's to
represent the relationship of the items within the dl.
For example - markup for a list of properties for sale:
dl
dtPhoto of Property/dt
dtAddress
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The opposite is true as well. I don't do work for large entities - only
very small local businesses so I can share their own situation. Theres
no question in my mind that these entities make up a huge share of
computer usage.
This typical office I work has computers
In playing I've found using the relative positioning working pretty good
for me. Is it just a matter of personal preference what I use then?
Thanks for the article I really haven't understood negative margins.
Michael Horowitz
Your Computer Consultant
http://yourcomputerconsultant.com
Sorry to come across blunt - but I don't think the web standards group is
meant to be a teacher of css. Great that people on here are wanting to
learn. But there are plenty of other places dedicated to these sort of
things.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Horowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam...
I am sorry but I have to disagree whole heartedly... What is the standards
group, if not a place where all people can who choose to, can come and gain
guidance and learning to become STANDARDS COMPLIANT??? It would appear that
this is exactly what the group is for...
I've mentioned this
I suspect there is more than a grain of truth in both David and Adams views.
If places like this are to reach the widest possible audience they must be
accessible to all (with reason); ditto to be a usable standards debating
forum we should be debating the finer points not spending ALL our time
Well hey everybody...
It would appear Andrew has decided to take his comments out of the public
view and turn them personal... Please read..
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:31 PM, David Fuller - magickweb wrote:
group does NOT have to be SPECIFICALLY about web standards
Perhaps not, but totally
Hi Kevin
I'm no developer, but I can certainly advise on the *design*
component of the project, if that would be of some assistance.
I have designed GUIs for a travel and hotel booking engines before
and as Joe Ortenzi says, I've been doing some research lately on
tabular data.
Feel
17 matches
Mail list logo
