Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone's had any luck with using JUST the PNG
component of Dean Edwards' IE7 JavaScript? The full thing seems like
overkill, because that's the only feature I really need.
Alternatively, how does one go about getting alpha support for CSS
background images? Not having a
On 12/28/05, Absalom Media [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering if anyone's had any luck with using JUST the PNG
component of Dean Edwards' IE7 JavaScript? The full thing seems like
overkill, because that's the only feature I really need.
Alternatively, how
Just tried with Sleight (which, incidentally, I'd read about before
but forgotten existed!) and got the same security warning from
IE6/XPSP2. =( Any suggestions welcome at this point! (Except for using
GIFs/indexed transparency :P)
On 12/28/05, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, thanks
for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
browsers
it all works nicely. Also the hover text that are supposed to appear those
not. Can someone check out the code and enlighten me?
Page: http://www.madshusskifestival.no/index2.php
CSS: http://www.madshusskifestival.no/css/skifestival.css
Regards
Morten Fjellman
--
Joshua Street
http
.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
Ah, my bad. I'd seen it misused/causing validation errors in the past,
so assumed that it was just not to be used at all.
Josh
On 12/11/05, Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Dec 2005, at 8:17 PM, Joshua Street wrote:
input name=navn value= type=text
You're using the name
help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
:) Semantically, I thought it better to have like:
a href=http://www.xyzcorp.com; ... class=sponsor xyzcorpXYZCorp/a
and then stylistically 'overload' this with a nice GIF. Perhaps not? I
don't know.
Joshua Street wrote:
Just use ALT text? Isn't that accessible enough? Or am I
to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
Single sane reason: Well now, I suppose they're not trying to get
themselves indexed by a search engine, are they? ;-)
josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
On 12/8/05, Lea de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/12/2005, at 12:54 PM, Paul Bennett wrote:
Trolling
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http
/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http
Haven't got time to try (last HSC exam tomorrow! woo! -- final school
exams here in NSW Australia), but maybe using the display: property to
ditch normal table-like behaviours for the thead?
http://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_display.asp
Then try position:fixed. No idea if this works or not,
list? It seems to me that is a plain way
to do that job m8.
dl
dtheader/dt
dditem1/dd
...
/dl
dl is handy because you can use more headers (dt tags) in the same list etc.
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
application somewhat. :-(
I'm interested to hear if anyone's encountered/had any dealings with it, though.
Kind regards,
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
markup. Just thought I'd point that out.
regards,
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
On 11/1/05, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello all,
Ive started designing sites for this company that specilizes in .net
databases driven/xml feed type sites. I just give them a graphics file and
they slice it up. Anyway they asked me yesterday if i could do this
particular job with
a 1280x1024 display here, a colleague
on 1024x768 couldn't see it at all)... and stop the links from being
clickable (whilst the image-replacement was still visible).
http://spl.base10solutions.net/events.html
That's the URL, any ideas?
Thanks :)
A bamboozled Josh
--
Joshua Street
http
can send a blank message to unsubscribe to. Maybe that would suffice
for the footer, if such a thing is possible with whatever software the
listserv is using?
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list
it to do!)
Hope this isn't too far off the mark...
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
Example link?
On 10/29/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a hidden field in a css styled form and when you view the page it's
shown as a line in firefox, any ideas?
tia
dave
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
stylesheet to
stop this from appearing.
HTH,
Josh
On 10/29/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://65.36.226.10/contact/contact.cfm
From: Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 2:11 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re
On 10/29/05, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say this is why you see the line - your hidden input will be
given display:block, with that border.
Removing display:block should fix it.
Ah, that makes more sense than mine :P Guess I was in too much of a
hurry to make a point!
--
Joshua
On 10/30/05, Kenny Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So back to the original question, is there any way to serve a rule
only to firefox (or only to non-firefox) without invalidating the css?
Heh, server-side browser sniffing? ;-)
/flamebait
Josh
On 10/30/05, Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, why is this flamebait. I suggested this in another thread a
couple of days ago. Is there a problem I'm not aware of with server-side
sniffing?
Mm, well... it's not really a problem if it's properly maintained.
But, seeing as many
Speaking pragmatically, does it matter? I think Firefox is pretty
good, and I personally use it (with web developer extension) to build
stylesheets (I find it really helpful to watch the elements fall into
place as I adjust styles in realtime).
That is, for me, the fastest way to get a style that
with commercial IT experience since 1994 …
** Web Design and Development
** SMS Solutions, including developer API
** Domain Registration, .COM for as low as AUSD$15 a year, .COM.AU for
AUSD$50 two years!
** Seamless Merchant integration
** We endorse PayPal, accept payments online now!
--
Joshua
!
** Seamless Merchant integration
** We endorse PayPal, accept payments online now!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Street
Sent: Friday, 28 October 2005 4:53 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Weird
this make sense?
Ted
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
: #27455f;
border: 1px solid #ff;
}
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
On 10/28/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i put the ie7 hack in and it works fine now.
gotta love ie
How big is that thing? Can you split it up so you can just use the
bits you need (i.e. :pseudo-selector), or do you need to use the full
thing? I'd heard it's largish (but haven't ever used
On 10/28/05, Focas, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ie7 hack being what?
grant
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/ I presume...
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Yeah. I think it's kind of Gmail's fault. You'll note the mailing list signature isn't showing up on my messages, either. I'm sending this message in HTML format in the hope it stays more intact than plain text
when the WSG list processes it... there's something seriously wrong
with Gmail vs. WSG
in the boundaries of my parent element.
Any ideas?
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
into the rest of the content.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Street
Sent: Monday, 24 October 2005 6:32 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] specifying width of pre
codeprecontent/pre/code
Gives you
On 10/25/05, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally I would do that, but in this particular case I was hoping not to
use server-side formatting of the content. But it seems I will have to
revert to that.
I have never had any use for the pre tag. Now I thought I
, but we can't use legend
and place/style how we want. Choose one.
Yes.
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
N���.�Ȩ�X���+��i��n�Z�֫v�+��h��y�m�쵩�j�l��.f���.�ץ�w�q(��b��(��,�)උazX����)��
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 02:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
I think of it more as, on Mac there is a decent browser (safari). So
there isn't much need for FF there. Whereas PC users really need FF.
It's also worth remembering Opera have recently released their browser
for free (as in beer), so
are
installed)?
For the record, IE/Win renders correctly (in the desired fashion,
that is), as does Opera/Lin and Konqueror/Lin.
Is this a bug? Any ideas?
Slightly perlexed,
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
.
HTH,
Josh
--
Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
generate content before that was printed to PS then to PDF... and
this would be really useful for me there (e.g. for generating
numbered, printed content in a run-once context).
Regards,
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
whenyou have launched the program right? so if i'm launching them (old
standalone IE5 5.5) once a month to *only* test pages that I'vecreated - I'm not leaving my system open to some rogue securitybreachingaction right?-- Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/+61 (0) 425 808 469
Not strictly DC, but along a similar vein... don't suppose anyone knows
if any/many search engines take ICBM meta data or geo.position meta data
into account when determining local content?
I ask because, whilst Google is generally pretty good with localised
versions (my personal site[1] is a
design can help achieve
this, because you've got more than one shot at specifying fonts to target
different platforms... amongst other things, like handheld stylesheets, etc.
/rant
Josh
--
Joshua Street
base10solutions
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
winmail.dat
completely on top of that whole clearing thing,
so I'm not 100% sure
that'll work... the theory runs something like that, though. Play around.)
HTH,
Josh
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax
/ie5b.html#display would suggest that
it's not.
http://wellstyled.com/singlelang.php?lang=enpage=css-inline-blocks.html
has some more that looks related... it looks achievable, but I haven't
got IE5 here to test.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:00 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since the testimonial is basically a quote, why not use the q element?
Then use the presidents name within the cite element. This way it is
semantic, and you still get to style the presidents name any way that you
feel fit!
again and can only be used for
href data.
So... is there any way to define this relationship? Or is it just
order-of-content and hoping it makes sense? What if you were to put the
cite after the quote for whatever reason (style guide convention, etc)?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
Isn't b still valid? If you want to have a weightless way of
bolding the text, but don't want to mess with a span, use b .
Yes. It's in the presentation module for XHTML 1.1
(
think... I've never
been completely on top of that whole clearing thing, so I'm not 100%
sure that'll work... the theory runs something like that, though. Play
around.)
HTH,
Josh
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax
boundaries in the form of what is most
easily coded up is more constraining than building your layout, then
going back and altering [the design] if things just aren't possible in
the medium.
Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 21:52 -0400, Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
As a one
, without the
markup-muck that font tags bring on.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:46 +1000, John Allsopp wrote:
You'll hear more about that at WE045
I hope we don't have to wait until 2045 for quality coding to catch on!
;-)
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572
increasingly sparse: perhaps the only valid (haha) excuse
remaining is that of a target audience consisting largely of pre-version
5 user agents.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 23:40 -0400, Donna Jones wrote:
does anyone have an url for this? tried finding it on moz and couldn't
and really would like to try it out.
http://accessibar.mozdev.org/
HTH
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 01:42 -0500, dwain alford wrote:
Rick Faaberg wrote:
it's a browser extension, so it should function on
mac osx.
Actually, it's probably using Windows' built in text-to-speech for
rendering audio, so possibly not.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 12:01 +0100, Patrick Lauke wrote:
Joshua Street
Actually, it's probably using Windows' built in text-to-speech for
rendering audio, so possibly not.
Actually, it's using a java text-to-speech engine, so it's cross platform
as long as you have a working JRE
asking why on earth you were using pixels in the first place, as
you know that you're ultimately relinquishing control, and all you're
really doing is irritating your users by not respecting their text-size
defaults.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au
as they attempt to escape it.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
a
compromise -- print style sheet shouldn't translate as devoid of all
style, one would hope.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
E
one then make it open source down the
track, however I don’t really have that much time to wait for it.
This may be doing the same thing, I'm uncertain.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425
didn't help for css background sizing in %.
Anyone can help?
Thanks in advance.
Bruce Prochnau
BKDesign Solutions
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia
a
super-quick check?
Can't check Safari (no Mac here), but Konqueror 3.4.0 copes fine.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
of
quickly: site map slash slash about us slash slash... (presuming
that's how it works?)
Aside from those fairly minor things, the markup is great quality and
the design is similarly alluring (and a nifty logo, if you did that!).
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http
fallback
option (obviously with appropriate ALT text defined)? I'm no expert on
using object tags, but I don't see anything wrong provided it's
redundant at all levels... but am perfectly happy to be corrected if
it's invalid or there are other reasons it's a bad practise...
Kind Regards,
Joshua
_assume_ it's
valid code. No embed or object tags in sight...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:39 +1000, Joshua Street wrote:
svg xmlns=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; version=1.0
rect stroke=black fill=none rx=5px y=16px x=72px
width=202px height=61px/
/svg
Err, of course, it closed the /svg tag properly... oops.
Josh
it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly
live without, but Safari is a bit of a bugger. I don't have a Mac here
so I can't test - I'm curious as to whether it can be made to degrade
acceptably. Could someone with a Mac please check the test page?
Thanks!
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
work to correct as the thread of
discussion progresses.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
, the URL (apple's site) above is working, but not the download link
(ftp://ftp.osxgnu.org/pub/Networking/Lynx-2.8.6-10.2-10.4.dmg.sit) the url
provided.
A domain search shows that it's valid.
http://www.whois.sc/osxgnu.org
Tee
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http
lists would clash with each other.
I can't come up with any nice solution for this that adheres to web
standards and makes things accessible.
Any suggestions?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
of lists than simply with anchors.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
supports this becomes a (relatively)
trivial task.
Just a thought...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
Configuration error
Parser Error Message: The format of the file
'FuelAdvance.Components.Web' is invalid.
Line 35. Yeah, the form layout has some issues :P
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 17:15 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote:
Guys n gals,
Im having some quirky layout issues with
in their
appropriate entity codes.
Could someone shed any light on this? Are entity codes redundant, or
should we be using them where possible?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
certain characters
not written in their appropriate entity codes.
Hmmm...that's a very English centric view of the Web ;-)
Yeah, I thought that too, but couldn't think of another way to say it!
*blushes whilst wishing he were bilingual!*
Thanks :)
--
Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED
Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
E-mails
, and
are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, br / is
theoretically semantically null... shrug!)
Looks okay to me...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia
, and shouldn't be marked up as one.
It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty
straight-forward if you ask me.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Design
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
on 5/30/2005 11:10 AM Joshua Street said the following:
On Mon
to their spirit - namely, ensuring a more
meaningful and accessible web.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
registered trademark reg; #174;
Copied and pasted from
http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_entitiesref.asp
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:58 +0100, Lee wrote:
Hello Listpeople,
Anyone know if there's an XHTML special char. for ?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http
View style information utility.
Generally, great site!
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
p.s. whose idea was this:
http://www.lastminute.com/site/main/boss_page_spreadsheet.html
I laughed... :D
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:28 +0100, Tom Hamshere wrote:
Any feedback appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax
http://photomatt.net/tools/texturize makes it really easy. He's also
responsible for the WordPress blogging software (I know, off topic...)
which has that function embedded. Quotation marks and apostrophes, if
copied out of Word, can give you all kinds of messy encoding errors...
best to either
of doing this?
Thanks.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute
of mess before? Aside from browser
testing Dreamweaver as though it were another user agent, is there
anything that can be easily done to fix it?
We're probably just going to use a content management system instead,
but it's a bit frustrating...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Website:
http
, John Horner wrote:
the system is pretty much exactly the same...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
: that on-list, but if there's a quick and easy way to
make this spider by HTTP instead, and/or send the report in an email
(assuming it's not already doing so, by some huge thing I've completely
missed!) - possibly using Cron, or whatever, I'd be really interested to
find out!
Joshua Street
. The datestamp on the message was Thu, 11
Nov 2004 01:48:36 +0100 if you want to read the original.
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060
Fax: (02) 8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded
You can use PHP to output header information, and also to do content
negotiation. I don't know code for it off the top of my head, but Google
probably would turn up something.
Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
-Original Message-
From: Richard Czeiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
that's the most workable solution proposed yet...
Josh
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 08:17, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Joshua Street wrote:
What's the recommended practice with indentation?
Uh - is there any reason not to use pre?
Charles Eaton wrote:
I'll second that with the css code of white
with the issue of semantics.
Is it okay to have untitled definitions? Is it okay to use definition
lists like this at all? Or, better still, does someone have another
solution which I've missed completely?
Thanks in advance,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com
101 - 200 of 216 matches
Mail list logo