[WSG] CSS selector builder

2005-09-26 Thread tee
Got this from a friend. it comes in handy as I am taking a CSS 2.1 class right now and the first and second week assignments are selectors. http://disruptive-innovations.com/zoo/selectorBuilder/ selectorBuilder.xul It can only open in Firefox by the way. tee

Re: [WSG] IE MAC just won't play ball!

2005-09-26 Thread Adam Morris
Thanks, Christain. I didn't think of doing that. Adam On 9/24/05, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the problem here might have to do with the fact that your XHTML is invalid. Please run every page through the validator and fix all the errors. There are definitely elements on

RE: [WSG] Using CSS for Flash backgrounds

2005-09-26 Thread kvnmcwebn
'And I agree Sam, having movement like that behind text is one of the worst things you can do.' I think that was meant as an example. If this trick is used in a more ambiant way it could be really useful. Maybe just have some image substitution for opera until a solution is found.

[WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsletter!

2005-09-26 Thread Craig Rippon
Just got this from a Killersites.com, what do you think of the article The Web Standards Lie: How the Web Standards movement has gone too far.? From: Stefan Mischook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 26 September 2005 7:37 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:

Re: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsletter!

2005-09-26 Thread John Allsopp
Ignore it, its a troll john On 26/09/2005, at 7:44 PM, Craig Rippon wrote: Just got this from a Killersites.com, what do you think of the article The Web Standards Lie: How the Web Standards movement has gone too far. ? From: Stefan Mischook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 26

Re: [WSG] Extending xhtml strict to include frameset and target

2005-09-26 Thread Isabel Santos
Well Martin, I got to the conclusion that there is no standard way to get rid of thespace bitween the two frames in a standard way: cellspacing=0 is out of xhtml, and no css style will take away that space, so out with the frames, I'll make the header a php include. As for the extending issue, I

RE: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsletter!

2005-09-26 Thread Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
-Original Message- From: Craig Rippon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 26 September 2005 7:44 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsletter! Just got this from a Killersites.com, what do you think of the

RE: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsl etter!

2005-09-26 Thread Herrod, Lisa
I think he's really just trying to stir up something controversial and attract people to his site. Surely anyone who was really serious about their own reputation and business would actually think about what they were saying, and research their point(less) before posting it... wouldn't they?

[WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

2005-09-26 Thread Jeremy Dowe
hi, What is the background CSS hack for Saffari on a Mac? http://jeronimo.net.au see example. Jez. -Original Message- From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:56 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: digest for

[WSG] CSS validator updated?

2005-09-26 Thread Bert Doorn
Has the CSS validator (the W3C one) just become a whole lot more pedantic? Sites that previously came out with a clean slate now throw up lots of warnings. I mean.. You'd expect sites made by people in the Features section of the WSG site to be perfect. I checked a few of them at random.

Re: [WSG] blockquote in screen viewer!

2005-09-26 Thread Kenny Graham
Lynx is text-only in the really old computer sense of the word. It can't display italics, only different text colors and background colors. This isn't a problem though. Displaying blockquotes as indented italics is just a popular way for graphical browsers to display them by default. It's not

Re: [WSG] CSS validator updated?

2005-09-26 Thread Kenny Graham
The CSS validator has a few new bugs mentioned recently on here. It's throwing errors where it shouldn't be, like on some integers that don't have .0 after them. Hopefully it'll get fixed soon. ** The discussion list for

Re: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsletter!

2005-09-26 Thread leenath1
What a laugh. I especially love this quote... "Since when are using Floats for page-level layout, semantically correct? Floats are designed to float images within the context of a paragraph. Yet many designs that are supposedly Web Standards compliant, use floats to create page

Re: [WSG] computer arts mag article/review

2005-09-26 Thread Zach Inglis
I thought you were being serious :p Im considering doing a BA course in Design atm personally. Even with my 7 years experience Im getting nowhere. I am talented which makes it more annoying. On 26 Sep 2005, at 02:07, Duncan Heal wrote: Thanks but I think my BA in Design Studies and 8

Re: [WSG] Using CSS for Flash backgrounds

2005-09-26 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Jon Dawson wrote: http://www.jomni.com/sandbox/flash_bg/ Not sure I know what it's supposed to look like. Opera 8.5 is presenting 3 lines of text on a gray background (default, I think), and a moving white box behind the text. http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/flashbgnd_op85_win2k.png Opera

[WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

2005-09-26 Thread King, Kenneth
Title: RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Please remove me from your list. I cancelled last week and got confirmation but for some reason I'm still getting emails. Thank you, -Original Message- From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org] Sent: Mon

[WSG] RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

2005-09-26 Thread King, Kenneth
Title: RE: digest for wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Please remove me from your list. I cancelled last week and got confirmation but for some reason I'm still getting emails. Thank you, -Original Message- From: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org] Sent: Mon

Re: [WSG] RE: digest for ADMIN

2005-09-26 Thread russ - maxdesign
ADMIN Please remember that these sorts of request should not be sent out the entire list, they should be sent to info@webboy.net Sending messages of this sort out to the list is akin to standing up in the middle of an opera and telling the entire audience that you need to go to the toilet. :)

Re: [WSG] Using CSS for Flash backgrounds

2005-09-26 Thread Christian Montoya
The only problem with this is sometimes when you right-click (if you ever need to right click) you get the Flash right-click options. You might also get certain Flash cursors instead of the default browser cursors. On 9/26/05, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 'And I agree Sam, having movement

Re: [WSG] computer arts mag article/review

2005-09-26 Thread Jan Brasna
Zach Inglis napsal(a) dne 26.9.2005 14:14: Im considering doing a BA course in Design atm personally. Even with my 7 years experience Im getting nowhere. I am talented which makes it more annoying. Eg. I am considering leaving the BA studies (Multimedia Design) to do something more

Re: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsletter!

2005-09-26 Thread Christian Montoya
I can never believe that people like that still exist. Even when I see it, I find it hard to believe. It isn't even worth contesting it. No point arguing with someone who has already ignored the facts.

Re: Re: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsletter!

2005-09-26 Thread adrian
Hello, I am in Sydney this week for a conference and will be back on the 3rd October. I will check my email regularly, but for urgent requests please SMS me a summary of the problem and send me though a detailed email. Please contact Haymarket for the mobile number to send the SMS. Regards,

Re: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsl etter!

2005-09-26 Thread sam sherlock
Hi, Just to put the cat amongst the peigons - some of the points raised are valid IMHO. and by the by so is the mark up. I think he is off mark on the use of styles My position is about temperance - moderation ‘reality in the field’ and not some ivory-tower specification - the reality and

[WSG] IFR- what is the latest version?

2005-09-26 Thread Drake, Ted C.
Hi All I have a quick question. I am looking for the latest version of using flash to replace header text. Is this the best approach? My feeble mind remembers an improved version out there in standardista-space. http://www.shauninman.com/plete/2004/04/ifr-revisited-and-revised Thanks Ted

Re: [WSG] IFR- what is the latest version?

2005-09-26 Thread Michael Wilson
Drake, Ted C. wrote: Hi All I have a quick question. I am looking for the latest version of using flash to replace header text. Is this the best approach? My feeble mind remembers an improved version out there in standardista-space.

Re: [WSG] IFR- what is the latest version?

2005-09-26 Thread sam sherlock
Any site using sIFR in FF cramps the text into an unreadable mass, the flash is not used and I am left with illegible text I have flash block installed, sIFR detects flash block and does not display the flash. The css leaves he text unreadable is this only me? Drake, Ted C. wrote:

Re: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsl etter!

2005-09-26 Thread Reeka Jean
Ya know, I'm by all means no professional web designer, nor do I design sites for anyone but myself... and my sites, at best, are only small personal websites where I can display the few pixel and photoshop goodies that I create in my spare time, blab a little about myself, my goals, and how

Re: [WSG] FW: Killersites.com Newsletter - Not another nerd newsl etter!

2005-09-26 Thread Christian Montoya
On 9/26/05, sam sherlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,Just to put the cat amongst the peigons - some of the points raised arevalid IMHO.Regardless of whether he has valid points or not, I think he is wrong from the start. Talk like this is part of the problem, not the solution. He's leading people

Re: [WSG] Using CSS for Flash backgrounds

2005-09-26 Thread Genau Junior
Christian Montoya wrote: The only problem with this is sometimes when you right-click (if you ever need to right click) you get the Flash right-click options. You might also get certain Flash cursors instead of the default browser cursors. On 9/26/05, *kvnmcwebn* [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Stuart Sherwood
I have been lucky enough to work with a very experienced java programmer on the last few sites I have designed. I do all the front end, he does the database, application, CMS, security and e-commerce development. The experience has been very pleasurable because of the degree of separation we

re: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread csslist
Have you ever seen anything that microsoft makes that makes anything near compliant code? didnt think so If you are going to use .net and want complient code then you will spend a lot of time going back and tweaking the code to get it to comply. From: Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday,

[WSG] 2-Column Liquid Designs

2005-09-26 Thread Chris Kennon
Hi, I'm searching for inspiration for (2) liquid corporate designs. Would someone pass along a few URI's? Chris ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints

RE: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Tatham Oddie \(Fuel Advance\)
Stuart, The out of box ASP.NET controls in v1.1 are really quite shocking. The out of box ASP.NET controls in v2 are XHTML compliant. (However this doesn't mean they are semantic.) However, the webforms concept (which uses all these drag n' drop controls) isn't very good when it comes to the

RE: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Tatham Oddie \(Fuel Advance\)
Not true you just need to know how to use it properly instead of Microsoft bashing. If you do want to use the built in controls and still get compliant markup, I can provide you with a really simple article on how to do so. Thanks, Tatham Oddie Fuel Advance - Ignite Your

Re: [WSG] 2-Column Liquid Designs

2005-09-26 Thread Christian Montoya
Perfect. http://liquid.rdpdesign.com has some very good professional sites listed. On 9/26/05, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,I'm searching for inspiration for (2) liquid corporate designs. Would someone pass along a few

Re: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Matthew Cruickshank
Stuart Sherwood wrote: I'm wondering how .net compares as I haven't had the chance yet to build a site with it? Current versions of ASP.Net have controls that favour IE over other browsers by using proprietary code (Eg. validation controls with Javascript use document.all). I think Microsoft

RE: [WSG] Using CSS for Flash backgrounds

2005-09-26 Thread ByteDreams
I remember coming across a fix for Opera that uses _javascript_, I just don't remember where I saw it now. Sorry! Eileen Russell http://www.bytedreams.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon DawsonSent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 6:57 PMTo:

RE: SPAM-LOW: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread csslist
wasnt bashing m$ was saying a FACT, you shouldnt have to use a 3rd party tool to get it right and your server-side lang shouldnt destroy your markup without user error. see other reply, the guy was right!! It does obviously favors ie and last i check ie and compliance werent on the same

Re: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Jake Badger
Not only that, visual studio actually changes valid code into invalid code. For example t'll remove closing LI tags and capitalise all your tags. I know that, having tried to get a css/xhtml site with MCMS, at this stage if you want to make a standards compliant web app C#.NET is way more

Re: [WSG] Using CSS for Flash backgrounds

2005-09-26 Thread sam sherlock
or so sublte its unnoticable and it increases the overall complexity of the site SS kvnmcwebn wrote: 'And I agree Sam, having movement like that behind text is one of the worst things you can do.' I think that was meant as an example. If this trick is used in a more ambiant way it

Re: [WSG] validation error - blockquote

2005-09-26 Thread Mordechai Peller
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: You need to have a block level container inside your blockquote...can't just have pure content. So, for instance: blockquote phere's the quote/p /blockquote While that's true for XHTML, it's not the case for HTML.

Re: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Jachin Sheehy
It is possible to configure VS.NET to leave your HTML alone: Tools Options Text Editor HTML/XML and have a look at 'Format' and 'Html Specific' panels As far as ASP.NET goes, the most annoying feature built into the framework is its insistence on serving up different markup to different

Re: [WSG] Java (JSP) v .net for standard and accessibility

2005-09-26 Thread Matthew Cruickshank
Jachin Sheehy wrote: That said, I note Stuart qualified his question by saying he had worked with an experienced Java programmer. Similarly, a good .NET programmer who is aware of the issues and concerned about web standards will also be able to help you achieve compliance. I have worked with

[WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Webmaster
So who's going to the Web Essnetials conference this week? Anyone interested in a group catch-up? I thought it might be nice to put some faces to all these names. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

RE: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Herrod, Lisa
That's a great idea, I'd love to put some faces to names/weird user names :) Lisa -Original Message- From: Webmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 2:19 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] WE05 - who's going? So who's going to the Web Essnetials

Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew Krespanis
I'm going. Will be doing a little 'live-bloggin' on http://notinteractive.com/ and more professional coverage on http://leftjustified.net/ I'll be up there from Wednesday night and would be keen to catch up with other WSG members for some warm up drinks :) Photo:

Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew Krespanis
EDIT: Whoops, that first URL should be http://notinteractive.wordpress.com/ I own notinteractive.com too, but I can't find the FTP details atm and there's no redirect to the wordpress sub-domain... Good thing I don't do this stuff for a living! Oh, wait a minute 0_o On 9/27/05, Andrew

RE: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Herrod, Lisa
Did you come out last year Kazuhito? I remember someone from Japan came out last year. :) lisa -Original Message- From: Kazuhito Kidachi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 2:50 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going? 2005/9/27,

RE: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Miles Burke
Wow, and I thought five of us coming from Perth was keen...Japan is even further afield. :) Be good to meet you all - should we have a secret handshake? :) I guess the drinks on Thursday night will uncover us all. Maybe someone can shout out and rustle everyone to put their hand up if they

RE: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Focas, Grant
I'm going, see you there. Grant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webmaster Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 2:19 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] WE05 - who's going? So who's going to the Web Essnetials conference this week?

RE: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Helen . Rysavy
At least three of us from Darwin are coming yahoo big city, here we come You'll know us by our thongs and singlets heh. :) :) *** Helen Rysavy Web Designer Teaching Learning Development Group Charles Darwin University, Northern Territory

Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Kazuhito Kidachi
Hi Lisa, 2005/9/27, Herrod, Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Did you come out last year Kazuhito? I remember someone from Japan came out last year. :) Yes I did. WE05 gives me my 2nd chance to go down under! :-) -- Kazuhito Kidachi mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Jake Badger
I'll be there http://www.flickr.com/photos/webessentials/44913770/ I'll be bloging nowhere, just representing my department. Lucky there isn't a spot the fed contest like they have at defcon. On 27/9/2005, Andrew Krespanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going. Will be doing a little

Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Andrew Krespanis
How about a secret password that you have to sneak into the first 60 seconds of meeting someone :)..? Or how about everyone interested just bites the bullet and posts their photo contact details like I just did? This secret handshake/signalling in crowded room nonsense isn't going to work.

RE: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Herrod, Lisa
oh spoil sport! can't we do both...? :) Just hold up your middle 3 fingers in a 'W' shape and touch tips as a secret handshake. ok, just kidding. Seriously, I was... -Original Message- From: Andrew Krespanis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 3:28 PM To:

RE: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Focas, Grant
Ok, this is me, http://we04.com/gallery/index.cfm?imgid=dsc_0044 see you there, Grant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Krespanis Sent: Tuesday, 27 September 2005 3:28 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's

Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

2005-09-26 Thread Peter Ottery
Andrew wrote: Or how about everyone interested just bites the bullet and posts their photo contact details like I just did? i'll be there. here's me: http://c41.com.au/ the secret password is youve been on this list *how* long and your site still uses tables? oh. the. horror. :)