Is there a js file somewhere that would allow me to just insert the following
into my pages:
!--[if lte IE 6]!--
script type=text/javascript src=http://cdn.domain.com/ie6.js;/script
!--![endif]--
It would then pop up a warning to the user (but only once per session) that
their browser was out
] On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: 11 June 2010 13:16
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE6 Finally Nearing Extinction [STATS]
Mike,
Thanks for this, whilst the sites I manage are pretty low-traffic, I
too have been seeing IE6 traffic of about 10-15%.
By mentioning shoppers I guess you
Mike,
Thanks for this, whilst the sites I manage are pretty low-traffic, I
too have been seeing IE6 traffic of about 10-15%.
By mentioning shoppers I guess you are running an e-commerce site. I
would be very interested to know how your revenue is split across
browsers. It seems that IE6
people that
should be concentrating on accessibility are people working on
creating browsers and operating systems because they can really do
something about it.
Andy
--
a...@universalsprout.com
Andrew Stewart
Sydney :: +61(0)416 607 113
London :: +44(0)7900 245 789
they are
such a poor imitation of the full site, I don't think they really
count. Yes they display the same information but not in a usable manner.
Andy
--
a...@universalsprout.com
Andrew Stewart
Sydney :: +61(0)416 607 113
London :: +44(0)7900 245 789
www.universalsprout.com :: websites
Sorry to ask again, but please explain how the site could be made
accessible whilst maintaining the same ease of use?
On 1 Feb 2010, at 10:31, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org]
On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart
Sent: Sunday, January 31
spend forming the correct keywords would be better
spent improving the quality of your content.
Andy
--
a...@universalsprout.com
Andrew Stewart
London :: +44(0)7900 245 789
Sydney :: +61(0)416 607 113
www.universalsprout.com :: websites that sprout
On 30 Jun 2009, at 16:46, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
For an example of a high-contrast version may I suggest to check out
the Sydney Morning Herald's Travel section (http://www.smh.com.au/travel/
). Click on Low vision in the navigation bar (We're going to
replace low vision with high contrast
mention that I am primarily a flex/flash developer
creating very visual sites that I doubt would work at all with a
screen reader. But unlike every flash/flex developer I have met, I am
very interested in accessibility, SEO, and standards.
Thanks,
Andy
--
a...@universalsprout.com
Andrew
Craig, thank you for your response, this is the kind of thing that I
am after, however you did quote the most controversial part of me
email without the following sentence that slightly moderated it. I do
agree that having the web 100% accessible is the goal, but what is the
best way of
hated the lack of cross-browser compatibility, but the issues with
email clients are even worse - some don't support background images,
or even css.
Andy
--
a...@universalsprout.com
Andrew Stewart
London :: +44(0)7900 245 789
Sydney :: +61(0)416 607 113
www.universalsprout.com
I think the point is if you should be spending time developing
something with a bad user experience that hardly anyone will use. Yes
you could implement a spreadsheet app with tons of page requests, but
the user experience would be so bad that people probably wouldn't want
to use it.
On
enhancement, but I would be
really interested if anyone knew of a site that failed because it
didn't cater for users without JS or flash.
On 15 Jun 2009, at 14:48, Paul Novitski wrote:
At 6/14/2009 06:02 PM, Andrew Stewart wrote:
If you can improve the user experience using JS (why else would
On 15 Jun 2009, at 10:05, matt andrews wrote:
Here's a number for you: when I added JS usage stats gathering about a
year ago to a large site I was working on, I was quite surprised to
find that 10% (rounded to the nearest percent) of unique users were
not running Javascript. This was one of
14 matches
Mail list logo
