[WSG] PHP GET session ID's prevent validation?

session (e.g. not cookies) mode. You'll note that should be amp; in order to validate... Has anyone else had this happen to them before? Any suggestions are welcome. Cheers, Joshua Street Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808

Re: [WSG] Conflict with javascript dropdown menus and CSS

No problems here, Mozilla 1.6/Linux i686. What browsers have you seen the problems occur in? Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions

RE: [WSG] Image size--where should it be?

a href=http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer;img src=http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10; alt=Valid XHTML 1.0! height=31 width=88 //a /p Personally, I'd go the CSS, but it doesn't really matter... (I don't think) Joshua Street base10solutions http://www.base10solutions.com

Re: [WSG] Restricted HTML Editor?

getting help ** Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential

[WSG] GeoURL/Seach engine localisation

this information already? And if so, why aren't more people using it to get targeted traffic? This is primarily a 'bloging thing, of course, but I see no reason why it shouldn't be more widely applied. Just curious... I'm hoping this isn't too far off topic. Joshua Street base10solutions Website

RE: [WSG] GeoURL/Seach engine localisation

, but people don't seem to be aware of it or bothering to use it. It's an interesting idea, even if existing technologies don't take advantage of it. And, of course, as an added bonus, it has a fun acronym ;) Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898

Re: [WSG] Standards-based PHP tutorials for beginners...

perspective, this separation just reduces the chance of making some early mistakes which will take ages to correct six months down the track. Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments

Re: [WSG] accessible audio-visual content

... If you want *run-on-everything-out-of-the-box* compatibility, avoid QuickTime... go with some generic MPEG or AVI standard. Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent

[WSG] Longdesc?

it ever since... Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents

Re: [WSG] Longdesc?

Ahh, I didn't even think about the possibility of using anchors! Thanks for the informative response. :) Josh On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 21:29, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Joshua Street wrote: Does longdesc really have to comprise a link to an external page, or can it simply be an extended version

Re: [WSG] Testing render speed

to the list getting help ** Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded

Re: [WSG] Footer stuff

/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from

Re: [WSG] Online HTML text editor

? It's probably really simple, but I haven't tried... thought I'd ask here to see if anyone else had experience, before I go wasting time... Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any

RE: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing

Are you behind a caching proxy or something at work? -Original Message- From: Patrick Lauke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 30-Sep-04 6:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:RE: [WSG] Yahoo CSS'ing Weird indeed. From home, I see the new table-less design. From

[WSG] Left and right: inline content...

|Top| which sucks. Well, not completely, but it's not how I want it to look. Any suggestions? Joshua Street base10solutions winmail.dat

Re: [WSG] Left and right: inline content...

see... Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents of this e

[WSG] Semantic indentation

with the issue of semantics. Is it okay to have untitled definitions? Is it okay to use definition lists like this at all? Or, better still, does someone have another solution which I've missed completely? Thanks in advance, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com

Re: [WSG] Semantic indentation

that's the most workable solution proposed yet... Josh On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 08:17, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: Joshua Street wrote: What's the recommended practice with indentation? Uh - is there any reason not to use pre? Charles Eaton wrote: I'll second that with the css code of white

RE: [WSG] discussion at juicy studio: It's all in the MIME

You can use PHP to output header information, and also to do content negotiation. I don't know code for it off the top of my head, but Google probably would turn up something. Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions -Original Message- From: Richard Czeiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WSG] Re: It's all in the MIME

. The datestamp on the message was Thu, 11 Nov 2004 01:48:36 +0100 if you want to read the original. Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded

Re: [WSG] Validators - might be helpful.

: that on-list, but if there's a quick and easy way to make this spider by HTTP instead, and/or send the report in an email (assuming it's not already doing so, by some huge thing I've completely missed!) - possibly using Cron, or whatever, I'd be really interested to find out! Joshua Street

Re: [WSG] Someone who *wants* the peekaboo bug

, John Horner wrote: the system is pretty much exactly the same... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469

[WSG] Dreamweaver templates and CSS

of mess before? Aside from browser testing Dreamweaver as though it were another user agent, is there anything that can be easily done to fix it? We're probably just going to use a content management system instead, but it's a bit frustrating... Kind Regards, Joshua Street Website: http

Re: [WSG] hiding content with a click

of doing this? Thanks. Kind Regards, Joshua Street Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded as confidential. Please do not distribute

Re: [WSG] ® character

registered trademark reg; #174; Copied and pasted from http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_entitiesref.asp On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:58 +0100, Lee wrote: Hello Listpeople, Anyone know if there's an XHTML special char. for ? Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http

Re: [WSG] Site check

View style information utility. Generally, great site! Kind Regards, Joshua Street Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469

Re: [WSG] Site check

p.s. whose idea was this: http://www.lastminute.com/site/main/boss_page_spreadsheet.html I laughed... :D On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:28 +0100, Tom Hamshere wrote: Any feedback appreciated. Kind Regards, Joshua Street Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax

Re: [WSG] apostrophes, and the like.

http://photomatt.net/tools/texturize makes it really easy. He's also responsible for the WordPress blogging software (I know, off topic...) which has that function embedded. Quotation marks and apostrophes, if copied out of Word, can give you all kinds of messy encoding errors... best to either

Re: [WSG] CSS Dropdown menu

to their spirit - namely, ensuring a more meaningful and accessible web. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] Signature markup

, and are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, br / is theoretically semantically null... shrug!) Looks okay to me... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia

Re: [WSG] Signature markup

, and shouldn't be marked up as one. It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty straight-forward if you ask me. ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Design http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter on 5/30/2005 11:10 AM Joshua Street said the following: On Mon

RE: [WSG] Submit a form with text links

Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency E-mails

[WSG] Character encoding

in their appropriate entity codes. Could someone shed any light on this? Are entity codes redundant, or should we be using them where possible? Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469

Re: [WSG] Character encoding

certain characters not written in their appropriate entity codes. Hmmm...that's a very English centric view of the Web ;-) Yeah, I thought that too, but couldn't think of another way to say it! *blushes whilst wishing he were bilingual!* Thanks :) -- Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [WSG] Form layout issues

Configuration error Parser Error Message: The format of the file 'FuelAdvance.Components.Web' is invalid. Line 35. Yeah, the form layout has some issues :P On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 17:15 +1000, Tatham Oddie wrote: Guys n gals, Im having some quirky layout issues with

RE: [WSG] CSS List Separator

supports this becomes a (relatively) trivial task. Just a thought... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] Online screen viewer

, the URL (apple's site) above is working, but not the download link (ftp://ftp.osxgnu.org/pub/Networking/Lynx-2.8.6-10.2-10.4.dmg.sit) the url provided. A domain search shows that it's valid. http://www.whois.sc/osxgnu.org Tee Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http

Re: [WSG] Clash of nested lists

lists would clash with each other. I can't come up with any nice solution for this that adheres to web standards and makes things accessible. Any suggestions? Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021

RE: [WSG] Clash of nested lists

of lists than simply with anchors. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

work to correct as the thread of discussion progresses. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] footer technique

it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly live without, but Safari is a bit of a bugger. I don't have a Mac here so I can't test - I'm curious as to whether it can be made to degrade acceptably. Could someone with a Mac please check the test page? Thanks! Kind Regards, Joshua Street

Re: [WSG] using scalable vector graphics

_assume_ it's valid code. No embed or object tags in sight... Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] using scalable vector graphics

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:39 +1000, Joshua Street wrote: svg xmlns=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; version=1.0 rect stroke=black fill=none rx=5px y=16px x=72px width=202px height=61px/ /svg Err, of course, it closed the /svg tag properly... oops. Josh

Re: [WSG] Improvement on Flash Satay

fallback option (obviously with appropriate ALT text defined)? I'm no expert on using object tags, but I don't see anything wrong provided it's redundant at all levels... but am perfectly happy to be corrected if it's invalid or there are other reasons it's a bad practise... Kind Regards, Joshua

Re: [WSG] background images fluid

didn't help for css background sizing in %. Anyone can help? Thanks in advance. Bruce Prochnau BKDesign Solutions Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia

RE: [WSG] implicit / explicit labels which is better?

a super-quick check? Can't check Safari (no Mac here), but Konqueror 3.4.0 copes fine. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] Site Review Please - www.SalmonRecipes.Net

of quickly: site map slash slash about us slash slash... (presuming that's how it works?) Aside from those fairly minor things, the markup is great quality and the design is similarly alluring (and a nifty logo, if you did that!). Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http

Re: [WSG] Editor Controls

one then make it open source down the track, however I don’t really have that much time to wait for it. This may be doing the same thing, I'm uncertain. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425

RE: [WSG] Newbie Questions: East-Asian Character Sets and Marking-up Poetry

. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency E

Re: [WSG] Request for comments on a website (printing)

a compromise -- print style sheet shouldn't translate as devoid of all style, one would hope. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] web accessibility toolbar

as they attempt to escape it. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] web accessibility toolbar

asking why on earth you were using pixels in the first place, as you know that you're ultimately relinquishing control, and all you're really doing is irritating your users by not respecting their text-size defaults. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au

Re: [WSG] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility with Firefox

On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 01:42 -0500, dwain alford wrote: Rick Faaberg wrote: it's a browser extension, so it should function on mac osx. Actually, it's probably using Windows' built in text-to-speech for rendering audio, so possibly not. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website

RE: [WSG] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility with Firefox

On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 12:01 +0100, Patrick Lauke wrote: Joshua Street Actually, it's probably using Windows' built in text-to-speech for rendering audio, so possibly not. Actually, it's using a java text-to-speech engine, so it's cross platform as long as you have a working JRE

Re: [WSG] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility with Firefox

On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 23:40 -0400, Donna Jones wrote: does anyone have an url for this? tried finding it on moz and couldn't and really would like to try it out. http://accessibar.mozdev.org/ HTH Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone

Re: [WSG] Tables and divs and soon

increasingly sparse: perhaps the only valid (haha) excuse remaining is that of a target audience consisting largely of pre-version 5 user agents. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469

Re: [WSG] Educate the educators (was) Barclays standards redesign

On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 16:46 +1000, John Allsopp wrote: You'll hear more about that at WE045 I hope we don't have to wait until 2045 for quality coding to catch on! ;-) Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572

Re: [WSG] The Big Lie about CSS

, without the markup-muck that font tags bring on. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021 Mobile: 0425 808 469 Multimedia Development Agency

Re: [WSG] computer arts mag article/review

boundaries in the form of what is most easily coded up is more constraining than building your layout, then going back and altering [the design] if things just aren't possible in the medium. Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 21:52 -0400, Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote: As a one

Re: [WSG] Homepage Review: webnetdesignstudios.com

think... I've never been completely on top of that whole clearing thing, so I'm not 100% sure that'll work... the theory runs something like that, though. Play around.) HTH, Josh Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax

Re: [WSG] Homepage Review: webnetdesignstudios.com

completely on top of that whole clearing thing, so I'm not 100% sure that'll work... the theory runs something like that, though. Play around.) HTH, Josh Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax

Re: [WSG] Homepage Review: webnetdesignstudios.com

/ie5b.html#display would suggest that it's not. http://wellstyled.com/singlelang.php?lang=enpage=css-inline-blocks.html has some more that looks related... it looks achievable, but I haven't got IE5 here to test. Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au

Re: [WSG] Homepage Review: webnetdesignstudios.com

On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 12:00 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the testimonial is basically a quote, why not use the q element? Then use the presidents name within the cite element. This way it is semantic, and you still get to style the presidents name any way that you feel fit!

Use of cite WAS: Re: [WSG] Homepage Review: webnetdesignstudios.com

again and can only be used for href data. So... is there any way to define this relationship? Or is it just order-of-content and hoping it makes sense? What if you were to put the cite after the quote for whatever reason (style guide convention, etc)? Kind Regards, Joshua Street base10solutions

Re: [WSG] Homepage Review: webnetdesignstudios.com

On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 22:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote: Isn't b still valid? If you want to have a weightless way of bolding the text, but don't want to mess with a span, use b . Yes. It's in the presentation module for XHTML 1.1 (

RE: [WSG] avoid Verdana - I cant get the whole point.

design can help achieve this, because you've got more than one shot at specifying fonts to target different platforms... amongst other things, like handheld stylesheets, etc. /rant Josh -- Joshua Street base10solutions http://www.base10solutions.com.au/ winmail.dat

Re: [WSG] Dublin Core metadata

Not strictly DC, but along a similar vein... don't suppose anyone knows if any/many search engines take ICBM meta data or geo.position meta data into account when determining local content? I ask because, whilst Google is generally pretty good with localised versions (my personal site[1] is a

Re: [WSG] Browser Stats

On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 02:58 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote: I think of it more as, on Mac there is a decent browser (safari). So there isn't much need for FF there. Whereas PC users really need FF. It's also worth remembering Opera have recently released their browser for free (as in beer), so

Cross platform weirdness in FF WAS Re: [WSG] Chinese food and web standards

are installed)? For the record, IE/Win renders correctly (in the desired fashion, that is), as does Opera/Lin and Konqueror/Lin. Is this a bug? Any ideas? Slightly perlexed, Josh -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] faux columns for fixed AND percentage width

. HTH, Josh -- Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[WSG] Counters support?

to generate content before that was printed to PS then to PDF... and this would be really useful for me there (e.g. for generating numbered, printed content in a run-once context). Regards, Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] css for ie4/ie5

whenyou have launched the program right? so if i'm launching them (old standalone IE5 5.5) once a month to *only* test pages that I'vecreated - I'm not leaving my system open to some rogue securitybreachingaction right?-- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/+61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] Styling legends and fieldsets

, but we can't use legend and place/style how we want. Choose one. Yes. -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 N���.�Ȩ�X���+��i��n�Z�֫v�+��h��y�m�쵩�j�l��.f���.�ץ�w�q(��b��(��,�)උazX����)��

Re: [WSG] specifying width of pre

in the boundaries of my parent element. Any ideas? -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] specifying width of pre

? ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] specifying width of pre

into the rest of the content. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Street Sent: Monday, 24 October 2005 6:32 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] specifying width of pre codeprecontent/pre/code Gives you

Re: [WSG] specifying width of pre

On 10/25/05, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Normally I would do that, but in this particular case I was hoping not to use server-side formatting of the content. But it seems I will have to revert to that. I have never had any use for the pre tag. Now I thought I

Re: [WSG] specifying width of pre

Yeah. I think it's kind of Gmail's fault. You'll note the mailing list signature isn't showing up on my messages, either. I'm sending this message in HTML format in the hope it stays more intact than plain text when the WSG list processes it... there's something seriously wrong with Gmail vs. WSG

Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?

: #27455f; border: 1px solid #ff; } -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting

Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?

On 10/28/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i put the ie7 hack in and it works fine now. gotta love ie How big is that thing? Can you split it up so you can just use the bits you need (i.e. :pseudo-selector), or do you need to use the full thing? I'd heard it's largish (but haven't ever used

Re: [WSG] extra eyes on an input:focus ?

On 10/28/05, Focas, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The ie7 hack being what? grant http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/ I presume... ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

Re: [WSG] Weird displacement

with commercial IT experience since 1994 … ** Web Design and Development ** SMS Solutions, including developer API ** Domain Registration, .COM for as low as AUSD$15 a year, .COM.AU for AUSD$50 two years! ** Seamless Merchant integration ** We endorse PayPal, accept payments online now! -- Joshua

Re: [WSG] Weird displacement

! ** Seamless Merchant integration ** We endorse PayPal, accept payments online now! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Street Sent: Friday, 28 October 2005 4:53 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Weird

Re: [WSG] Adding a header to a tbody

this make sense? Ted -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting

Re: [WSG] form hidden field ?

Example link? On 10/29/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a hidden field in a css styled form and when you view the page it's shown as a line in firefox, any ideas? tia dave -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] form hidden field ?

stylesheet to stop this from appearing. HTH, Josh On 10/29/05, csslist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://65.36.226.10/contact/contact.cfm From: Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 2:11 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re

Re: [WSG] form hidden field ?

On 10/29/05, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd say this is why you see the line - your hidden input will be given display:block, with that border. Removing display:block should fix it. Ah, that makes more sense than mine :P Guess I was in too much of a hurry to make a point! -- Joshua

Re: [WSG] Firefox filter?

On 10/30/05, Kenny Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So back to the original question, is there any way to serve a rule only to firefox (or only to non-firefox) without invalidating the css? Heh, server-side browser sniffing? ;-) /flamebait Josh

Re: [WSG] Firefox filter?

On 10/30/05, Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seriously, why is this flamebait. I suggested this in another thread a couple of days ago. Is there a problem I'm not aware of with server-side sniffing? Mm, well... it's not really a problem if it's properly maintained. But, seeing as many

Re: [WSG] Which browser is most stanard compliant?

Speaking pragmatically, does it matter? I think Firefox is pretty good, and I personally use it (with web developer extension) to build stylesheets (I find it really helpful to watch the elements fall into place as I adjust styles in realtime). That is, for me, the fastest way to get a style that

Re: [WSG] Text choices on our own sites

can send a blank message to unsubscribe to. Maybe that would suffice for the footer, if such a thing is possible with whatever software the listserv is using? -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 ** The discussion list

Re: [WSG] Unstyling named anchors

it to do!) Hope this isn't too far off the mark... Josh -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some

[WSG] Opera list positioning oddity

a 1280x1024 display here, a colleague on 1024x768 couldn't see it at all)... and stop the links from being clickable (whilst the image-replacement was still visible). http://spl.base10solutions.net/events.html That's the URL, any ideas? Thanks :) A bamboozled Josh -- Joshua Street http

Re: [WSG] standards, accessability and validation?

On 11/1/05, kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello all, Ive started designing sites for this company that specilizes in .net databases driven/xml feed type sites. I just give them a graphics file and they slice it up. Anyway they asked me yesterday if i could do this particular job with

Re: [WSG] injecting an extra hook with javascript

markup. Just thought I'd point that out. regards, Josh -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints

[WSG] RapidWeaver?

application somewhat. :-( I'm interested to hear if anyone's encountered/had any dealings with it, though. Kind regards, Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http

Re: [WSG] css title styles

://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] List Headers?

list? It seems to me that is a plain way to do that job m8. dl dtheader/dt dditem1/dd ... /dl dl is handy because you can use more headers (dt tags) in the same list etc. -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469

Re: [WSG] position fixed on the thead

Haven't got time to try (last HSC exam tomorrow! woo! -- final school exams here in NSW Australia), but maybe using the display: property to ditch normal table-like behaviours for the thead? http://www.w3schools.com/css/pr_class_display.asp Then try position:fixed. No idea if this works or not,

Re: [WSG] talking points for standards

/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list getting help ** -- Joshua Street http://www.joahua.com/ +61 (0) 425 808 469 ** The discussion list for http

  1   2   3   >