Re: [WSG] Re: [OT] Anyone Wanna Wave?

I'll not post more of these but that's sent. Assume and other requests are until I post to say that I've run out. Simon On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Paco Lira wrote: > I want one please > > Regards, > > Paco lira > eLearning officer DSC ext.878 > > On 03/12/2009, at 9:09 PM, Simon Proctor w

Re: [WSG] Re: [OT] Anyone Wanna Wave?

I want one please Regards, Paco lira eLearning officer DSC ext.878 On 03/12/2009, at 9:09 PM, Simon Proctor wrote: I (perennial lurker on this list) have 38 (got 30 while I was in hospital having my appendix out). Drop me a line if you'd like one. On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Ghodmo

Re: [WSG] Re: [OT] Anyone Wanna Wave?

I (perennial lurker on this list) have 38 (got 30 while I was in hospital having my appendix out). Drop me a line if you'd like one. On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Ghodmode wrote: > All gone. > > That was quick :) > > If I get more invites, I'll send another email :) > > On Thu, 2009-12-03 at

[WSG] Re: [OT] Anyone Wanna Wave?

All gone. That was quick :) If I get more invites, I'll send another email :) On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 22:02 +1300, Ghodmode wrote: > I have 7 Google Wave invites. If anyone would like one, please email me > off-list. > > I'll send my invites to the first 7 people who ask :) > ***

[WSG] RE: Deprecated "start" for lists confirmation

That came up as a topic recently. I'm told a transitional doctype allows it. Mike Foskett From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Erickson, Kevin (DOE) Sent: 10 November 2009 15:17 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Deprecated "start" for lis

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

It looks like the Content-Type for the document is incorrect.  Currently, it is set to Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1.  It should be text/xml or application/xml.  In PHP, you can use header to set content type of the document.  http://php.net/manual/en/function.header.php  Sidenot

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest (Re: [WSG] skip links)

David Hucklesby さんは書きました: ピエールランリ・ラヴィン wrote: Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility, but it's not completed. I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers but: * Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't defi

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

ピエールランリ・ラヴィン wrote: Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility, but it's not completed. I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers but: * Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't define it) * Users may define

Re: [WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility, but it's not completed. I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers but: * Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't define it) * Users may define preferences keys * Mo

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Hi Bob, According to Wikipedia, the UK Government recommends accesskey="s" for skip nav: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_key#Use_of_standard_access_key_mappings Rich 2009/10/29 > * > WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DIGEST

Re: [WSG] Re: International SMS Provider

You might want to check out beamme might be what your looking for and they offer global delivery options. -Ryan On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Cp Master wrote: > Hi, >> >> I'm looking for an international sms provider (paid, not free). >> I need to send sms messages

[ADMIN] THREAD CLOSED Re: [WSG] Re: International SMS Provider

This thread is off topic for this list and is closed. Should you wish to help the OP, please reply off list. warmly, Lea -- Lea de Groot WSG Core Member *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubs

[WSG] Re: International SMS Provider

> > Hi, > > I'm looking for an international sms provider (paid, not free). > I need to send sms messages from my PHP application to users cellphones, > using PHP or any other server-side language. > > I have experience sending sms from my apps within my country, but here the > users going to be fr

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1? - ADMIN

More than one H1 on a page: good or bad? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIn5qJKU8VM On 20/10/2009, at 1:09 PM, Russ Weakley wrote: ADMIN Hi all, The conversation has been great, but we are now heading into heated discussion and direct attacks - which is unacceptable. Please remain civi

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1? - ADMIN

ADMIN Hi all, The conversation has been great, but we are now heading into heated discussion and direct attacks - which is unacceptable. Please remain civil and receptive or the thread will be closed. Thanks Russ (civility police) ***

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:32 PM, tee wrote: > Do you include a second H1 on the page too? No? >> > A bit arrogant question. Guess you think people who use h1 for logo don't > know anything about semantic markup :) > > tee, thry this on for size. from the w3c html elements about what an h1 refere

RE: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

rg [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of tee Sent: 19 October 2009 20:32 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1? On Oct 19, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Darren Lovelock wrote: > > No-one has said there is anything wrong with including a tagline on > every page. M

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

On Oct 19, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Darren Lovelock wrote: No-one has said there is anything wrong with including a tagline on every page. My point wasn't arguing that someone said it's wrong to t include a tagline on every page. It's more about this: in some situations, logo use in the websit

RE: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

you are ;) Darren Lovelock Munky Online Web Design http://www.munkyonline.co.uk T: +44 (0)20-8816-8893 -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of tee Sent: 19 October 2009 18:50 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Christian Fagan wrote: Agree with pretty much everything below. There seems to be no compelling reason to wrap the logo in a H1but there seems to be no compelling reason not to. Quite a number of my clients have taglines in their logos, and often times,

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

Return Receipt Your Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? document

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

Return Receipt Your Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? document

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Hi Christian, Google also use table layout for their pages, inline styles, don't use labels with input fields and so on. The fact that they use H1 around the logo just shows that they don't require SEO work. ;-) So your mention of Google using H1 around the logo does not illustrate anything. Thank

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Agree with pretty much everything below. There seems to be no compelling reason to wrap the logo in a H1but there seems to be no compelling reason not to. I'm probably swaying towards not wrapping the logo in a H1 any moreI doubt it will have much effect on SEO anyway. One final poi

[WSG] RE: More than one H1?

This is an argument which never seems to go away. Unfortunately the HTML 4 spec http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#h-7.5.5 confuses things a little by referring to the relative importance of different heading levels, rather than their structural function. Nevertheless, it also say

[WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Very interesting discussion on a point that often causes controversy. Here is my 2c for what its worth: The use of a single H1 per _page_ on a site comes from a mixture of IA, semantics, Accessibility and Usability with a nod to the history of publishing. I consider the notion of semantics

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

mats or the RDFA doctype you can identify the logo in a > vcard along with your company details. > > Darren Lovelock > Munky Online Web Design > http://www.munkyonline.co.uk > T: +44 (0)20-8816-8893 > > > -- > *From:* li...@webstandardsgr

RE: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Christian Fagan Sent: 17 October 2009 12:18 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1? Thanks for all your responsesI didn't expect this topic to be so clouded. For me and t

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Oh yes, and let's not forget that Google isn't the only search engine on the planet too. :-) On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Jason Grant wrote: > Once again I have to come back to this great thread - one of the best > discussions in the long time on this mailing list: > >- BBC uses H1 on th

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Once again I have to come back to this great thread - one of the best discussions in the long time on this mailing list: - BBC uses H1 on the logo on the home page, but around the article title on article specific page (e.g. view-source:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8312126.stm)

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Thanks for all your responsesI didn't expect this topic to be so clouded. For me and this particular site I'm working on, the problem still remainswhile Jason's article is well written, it doesn't use any *governing body (eg. W3C/Google) references* as basis for it's conclusions...it

Re: [WSG] Re: More than one H1?

2009/10/16 Jason Grant : > Ollie you are threading a dangerous ground there. > Explained here why you are > wrong: http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/semantic-uses-of-h1-h2-h6-html-tags/ Good link for this thread Jason. Although I don’t understand why the company name would be inappropriate semanti

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

*On > Behalf Of *Darren Lovelock > *Sent:* 16 October 2009 16:33 > *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > *Subject:* RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? > > > > To have the logo as a H1 on every page will most likely trigger spam > filters in the search engines as you are duplicating

RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

_ From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Darren Lovelock Sent: 16 October 2009 16:33 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? To have the logo as a H1 on every page will most likely trigger spam filters in the search

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

Gaspar wrote: This problem will be solved, I hope, with the use of and in HTML5. Indeed, in HTML5 the meaning of h1-6 is 'headings for the sections with which they are associated' - multiple h1 elements in a page is not a problem: http://dev.w3.org/html5/markup/h1.html A discussion of the

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

o the SEO expert they've already spoken to... > > I would have thought it's pretty obvious that you shouldn't do it ;) > > > Darren Lovelock > Munky Online Web Design > http://www.munkyonline.co.uk > T: +44 (0)20-8816-8893 > > ___

RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

s that you shouldn't do it ;) Darren Lovelock Munky Online Web Design <http://www.munkyonline.co.uk/> http://www.munkyonline.co.uk T: +44 (0)20-8816-8893 _ From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of EBS Admin Sent: 16 October 2009 15:5

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

ess. > > -- > *From:* li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] *On > Behalf Of *Jason Grant > *Sent:* 16 October 2009 16:00 > > *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > *Subject:* Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? > > That's only relevant if yo

RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

No but you can wrap MiniClip - Providers of Miniature Clips for Business. _ From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Jason Grant Sent: 16 October 2009 16:00 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? That's

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

nt:* 16 October 2009 15:45 > *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > *Subject:* Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? > > Yes but my argument against putting the H1 around the logo is that the logo > is present on all pages and typically each site will be optimised for it's > brand name (

RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

: Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? Yes but my argument against putting the H1 around the logo is that the logo is present on all pages and typically each site will be optimised for it's brand name (e.g. Flexewebs) so no value in highlighting that. I would potentially agree with you if you

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

round other content within the page, but certainly not the logo. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: "EBS Admin" Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:36:00 To: Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1? Okay so the justify, the first H1 is the title of a page which

RE: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

up the pages, and has a similar effect for screen readers. Hope this makes it a little clearer. _ From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Jason Grant Sent: 16 October 2009 15:25 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] RE: More than one

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

EBS Admin - Matt doesn't say to use multiple H1s on the page, but says that you will not get penalised for using them (within reason) on a given page. Every site I ever worked on I had used only one H1 on and it still enjoys being on first page of Google. My formula, hence, does not only say Google

[WSG] RE: More than one H1?

Jason, Thats clearly not the case, if you read the WIA guidlines then is advocates the use of multiple H1's, from an semantic point of view they make sense and in terms of SEO the make sense because every site we've built uses mutiple H1's and they enjoy page 1 results on Google. The video t

[WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Hey all, Am I the only one who is getting these messages directly sent to their deleted items? Please can you take the "out of office" bit out of the subject lines? I am sure there are others like me who have filters set up to automatically delete out of office messages. It's also a bit ironic

[WSG] Re: More than one H1?

Ollie you are threading a dangerous ground there. Explained here why you are wrong: http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/semantic-uses-of-h1-h2-h6-html-tags/ Thanks, Jason On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Oliver Boermans wrot

[WSG] Re: More than one H1?

If semantics and SEO are paramount, and typography is too, could you make an H2 which is the same size etc for the 'other' uses of H1? That way, your structure/appearance would be intact, and the SEO considerations satisfied?? Is that undesirable for any reason? Bob - Original Message -

[WSG] RE: WSG Digest

Try this #wrapper { height: 100px; width: 800px; } #box1 { height: 100px; width: 200px; float: left; border: thin solid #F00; } #box2 { height: 100px; width: 200px; float: left; border: thin solid #00C; } #box3 {

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Hi Bob, That's a good one. I've had a quick play and the only way I've found that works as you intend is by giving widths in % - ie, your fixed divs, 1, 2 (floated left) and 4 (floated right) all have, say, width:10%; while your elastic div 3 (also floated left) is given width:70%; Markup, using

[WSG] RE: new site review

Hi guys! Thanks for your comments! @Sarah: Thanks :) That's really nice to hear, and yes, I wanted to put more thinking on the text so that it would look a bit friendly yet not too geeky :P @Chris: Thanks, it's great to get some criticism. However, it's the first time I get a reply on problems w

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Could just make a CSS table, this is sort of what it could look like: content content content content content content content content content content

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Hi Marvin Good to see you have an interest in web design. This is a great industry with a lot of friendly competitors. The JavaScript: At the end of each line you need to have semi-colon ; Why the three changes to the same element in one call? b1 element does not exist The layout needs

[WSG] Re: An Acceptable Dropdown

bushidodeep wrote: All debates aside on drop-down menus, they're called for, demanded by some. I like this one, and wondered if anyone has a tutorial URL bookmarked? I wrote up a few considerations about accessible drop-down menus last year: http://learningtheworld.eu/

[WSG] Re: An Acceptable Dropdown [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Interesting example - when I opened this page to have look it took a little time for all of the sub/drop-down menus to get working. So my first experience of this site was the key navigation not working. It did come good so not all was lost! I'll be interested to see the

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

CSUN is a great site overall. The dropdown menu on homepage is nice, but not keyboard accessible. Also, the CSS needs a focus state; broken form labels at top of Site Index page. Oh, for drop-down help, look up "Son of Suckerfish". Regards, Dennis Dennis Lembrée http://www.WebOverhauls.com http://

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

#main{ width:60%; float:right; background-color:#FAA; } #sidebar{ width:200px; background-color:#AA; } Main Side Regards, Dale

[WSG] Re: Strange Bottom Margin on Floated Elements I Can't Get Rid of

Cole, you still have margin on your a element. If you set your bottom margin on your a to 0, you'll probably be happy. For troubleshooting purposes, put a "border:thin solid blue;" around an element, and that way you see the space it occupies, then do the same, but change the color to red,

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Try floating the divs also. Alan C. Whiteman Visualis Web Design http://visualis.us (562) 305-2862 On Friday 14 August 2009 10:47:59 you wrote: > * > WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DIGEST > **

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Hey Cole, Just add a height to .thumblink of 62px and the margin disappears Kerri On 14/08/09 5:47 PM, "wsg@webstandardsgroup.org" wrote: > * > WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DIGEST > **

Re: [WSG] Re: Announcement from web standards development/ xhtml / css / seo

This is an automated message from g...@siworks.co.za. Good day, I am on currently on leave and will be back in the office on monday the 17th August 2009 Please contact my office on 011 466 3872 and speak to Daniel, alternativly at last resort send me an SMS and I will contact you. Thanks // Dankie

[WSG] Re: Announcement from web standards development/ xhtml / css / seo

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, web standards development/ xhtml / css / seo wrote: > Im trying to make a new cleverclick site but Im very sceptic to the > appearance i created so far...http://www.cleverclick.gr/new/ > > What do you think?? Not good:

[ADMIN] Thread Closed Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

OK, I've unsubscribed both parties. Thread closed, party over :-P Lea -- Lea de Groot WSG Core Group Member *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubs

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Enough please! Thanks Russ On 04/08/2009, at 7:11 AM, Patrício dos Santos wrote: LET'S DO From: inspiron.patters...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:24:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!! -- Brett P.

RE: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

LET'S DO From: inspiron.patters...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:24:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tony McNulty wrote: Just for that I think

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Acually, reading between the lines it looks like he really wants to stay... Bruce - Original Message - From: Tony McNulty To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest Just for that I think we should keep him on

RE: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Thank you for making me laugh on what has been a hitherto unfunny day. Night Cam From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Tony McNulty Sent: 03 August 2009 18:14 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tony McNulty wrote: > Just for that I think we should keep him on! > > -- > *From*: Brett Patterson > *Date*: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:16 -0400 > *To*: > *

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Just for that I think we should keep him on! -Original Message- From: Brett Patterson Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:16 To: Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan < danielpau

RE: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Monday, August 03, 2009 5:35 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan mailto:danielpaulro...@googlemail.com>> wrote: Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscri

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan < danielpaulro...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscribed leave me alone! > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, TapirDesigns > wrote: > >> I am currently away u

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscribed leave me alone! On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, TapirDesigns wrote: > I am currently away until 5th August but will get back to you as soon as > possible on my return. > > > *** > List G

[WSG] Re WSG Digest

I am currently away until 5th August but will get back to you as soon as possible on my return. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Hel

[WSG] Re WSG Digest

I am currently away until 5th August but will get back to you as soon as possible on my return. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Hel

[WSG] Re WSG Digest

I am currently away until 5th August but will get back to you as soon as possible on my return. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Hel

[WSG] Re: The of the document [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

This might be pushing this slight off ‘standard’. I noticed the question asked about headers and ‘good search ranking’. In respect to the tag one of the most useful and simple optimisation for search is a clear and descriptive title. This is often what users use to make decisions on the relevan

[WSG] RE: The of the document

David Nixon Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:43 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] RE: The of the document Hi Paul >From an SEO perspective there is great value put on keywords and titles >providing they reflect the content within the document. However if the keywor

RE: [WSG] RE: The of the document

up.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of David Nixon Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:13 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] RE: The of the document Hi Paul >From an SEO perspective there is great value put on keywords and titles providing they reflect the content

[WSG] RE: The of the document

Hi Paul >From an SEO perspective there is great value put on keywords and titles >providing they reflect the content within the document. However if the keywords are over proliferated within the document the index engines tend to pick up on this and mark them down as 'suspect' Content is king!

RE: [WSG] RE: Using background images on submit buttons

> On Behalf Of Rachel Radford > Sent: 24 June 2009 14:51 > Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: Using background images on submit buttons > I fear the only proper solution while using .Net is for the HTML that is > produced to change! Rachel, have you had a look at the CSS control adapters (htt

RE: [WSG] RE: Using background images on submit buttons

Behalf Of Jens-Uwe Korff Sent: 19 June 2009 00:39 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] RE: Using background images on submit buttons >on an ASP.NET-driven site we'd like to use background images for flexible-width submit inputs. >Due to the .NET limitation we cannot use the tag a

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office until the 29th. I will be checking my email intermittently until then. If you have an urgent support query, please send an SMS to the support number you have been given and I'll respond as soon as possible. Best regards, Phil Houghton Managing

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office until the 29th. I will be checking my email intermittently until then. If you have an urgent support query, please send an SMS to the support number you have been given and I'll respond as soon as possible. Best regards, Phil Houghton Managing

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office until the 29th. I will be checking my email intermittently until then. If you have an urgent support query, please send an SMS to the support number you have been given and I'll respond as soon as possible. Best regards, Phil Houghton Managing

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office until the 29th. I will be checking my email intermittently until then. If you have an urgent support query, please send an SMS to the support number you have been given and I'll respond as soon as possible. Best regards, Phil Houghton Managing

[WSG] RE: Using background images on submit buttons

>on an ASP.NET-driven site we'd like to use background images for >flexible-width submit inputs. >Due to the .NET limitation we cannot use the tag and are stuck with >the following syntax: > Thank you for your inputs. However, we really cannot use the element. I'll be looking into adding a wr

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

Hi all, We are only a few days away from the Brisbane Joomla Day on Saturday May 2nd. Amongst lots of other goodies, I am doing a talk on Jentla, our multisite manager for Joomla. Here are a couple of features which people in web standards strugle to manage that can be easily done with Jentla on

[WSG] Re: Web accessibility research

Hi I am a university student studying for a B.Sc.(Hons.) in Mathematics and Informatics at the University of Malta and I am currently involved in a study that is exploring the challenges persons with disabilities face when using the Internet. Part of the investigation consists in conducting

Re: [WSG] Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back?

*From:* li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] *On > Behalf Of *Sam Sherlock > *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2009 4:25 AM > *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > *Subject:* Re: [WSG] Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back? > > Old Mac Users are stuck I

RE: [WSG] Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back?

behind outdated computers this will not work. Ted _ From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Sam Sherlock Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:25 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back

Re: [WSG] Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back?

Old Mac Users are stuck I tried to a get a friends mac online and using Yahoo Mail (around the time a ymail dropped support of that browser) it had ie5 and nothing would work at all, no other options it was a second hand (supposedly cost effective machine) phazed into obselence. I frequently see I

Re: [WSG] Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back?

On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 21:10 +1300, Sigurd Magnusson wrote: > Most websites we build at SilverStripe have IE 6.0 as a minimum, and > even then, we're unpatiently anticipating the time when we can drop IE > 6. I still see quite a few people using IE5 Mac (probably OS9 users stuck with that) in t

[WSG] Re: WSG Digest

I am currently out of the office running a training course returning the morning of the 18/03/2009. I will have limited access to email but will try to respond to your enquiry. If your enquiry is urgent then please contact me on my mobile. Kind regards Ben Logan Director Spotless Design http

Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest - ADMIN THREAD CLOSED

ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED! Enough! This discussion has gone on far too long. Please get back to discussing relevant topics! As the guidelines state: "Do not post problems or complaints to the list. Instead, email Peter and Russ off-list (memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org)" Thanks Russ ***

Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest

rch 16, 2009 5:52 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest Glen Wallis wrote: Am I the only person on this list who is sick of the constant and blatant advertising for this Content Management System? Don't we have rules against this? If so, they are not being

RE: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest

. Rick > -Original Message- > From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] > On Behalf Of Mark Harris > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 5:52 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest > > Glen Wallis wrot

Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest

Agreed, I thought this was the WSG, I didn't sign up for CMS ads and updates thanks. Bruce bkdesign solutions - Original Message - From: Peter Dolkens To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:16 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest Ya,

Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest

Ya, then there's posts like: == From: Sigurd Magnusson Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:43:04 +1300 Subject: SilverStripe 2.3.0 released. The open source SilverStripe CMS and MVC framework (PHP5) has now had a v2.3.0 release: It brings a signific

RE: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest

From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Boyd Sent: 16 March 2009 10:28 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:14 PM, wrote: I agree with this bloke - it's starting to look

Re: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest

From: kie...@humdingerdesigns.co.uk To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, 16 March, 2009 5:14:27 PM GMT +07:00 Bangkok, Hanoi, Jakarta Subject: RE: [WSG] RE: [BULK] WSG Digest I agree with this bloke - it's starting to look like blatant advertising. www.humdingerdesigns.co.uk ---

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >