[WSG] firefox and classid on flv easter egg

Hi all, I'm designing a site for a friends master thesis on Fisical Chemistry for Education, about Nanotechnology. Since the public target is teenagers, the site has an high impact header with an flv file. The flv is not important and is mean't as more of an easter egg, it shows the skin play cont

Re: [WSG] Firefox Ignoring Stylesheets

> Your problem is neither markup-related nor script-related. It definitely stems from the wrong media type of the Style Sheets, as others have already pointed out. Test it yourself: http://cgi.w3.org/cgi-bin/headers?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.markboulto

Re: [WSG] Firefox Ignoring Stylesheets

The following reply is from a forum where the problem was posted: "After not being able to get this out of my head, I reproduced the page and put it up here; http://six03.com/lab/guardian After validating the page and placing the scripts in one js folder, it works. I think it was either t

Re: [WSG] Firefox Ignoring Stylesheets

That is real strange. i am on a mac and see the same thing. what about trying to do css import instead of including trough link meta? i think i did this at http://slipper-shop.nl/ On Apr 29, 2009, at 7:50 PM, CK wrote: Hi, Well aware this is not a Firefox forum, but FF 3.0.9 in OS X 10.5.6

Re: [WSG] Firefox Ignoring Stylesheets

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, CK wrote: > Hi, > > Well aware this is not a Firefox forum, but FF 3.0.9 in OS X 10.5.6 is > ignoring both print and screen stylesheets for the following: > > > > > Has anyone a suggestion? Could it be because the css

Re: [WSG] Firefox Ignoring Stylesheets

On 2009/04/29 10:50 (GMT-0700) CK composed: > Well aware this is not a Firefox forum, but FF 3.0.9 in OS X 10.5.6 is > ignoring both print and screen stylesheets for the following: > > Has anyone a suggestion? Contact the site admin and have h

Re: [WSG] Firefox Ignoring Stylesheets

Tools » Error console Error: The stylesheet http://www.markboulton.co.uk/examples/guardian/css/screen.css was not loaded because its MIME type, "text/html", is not "text/css". Source File: http://www.markboulton.co.uk/examples/guardian/ -- Алексей *

[WSG] Firefox Ignoring Stylesheets

Hi, Well aware this is not a Firefox forum, but FF 3.0.9 in OS X 10.5.6 is ignoring both print and screen stylesheets for the following: Has anyone a suggestion? CK ***

RE: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Nathan de Vries > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 6:11 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height > > On 18/07/2008, at

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

On 18/07/2008, at 7:45 AM, David Hucklesby wrote: Of course, there are several other ways to enclose floats that do not require that extra DIV. I would have thought that the method described by PIE [1] would be the only sane way to do this. -- Nathan de Vries [1] http://www.positionisevery

RE: [WSG] Firefox 3 and fieldset elements

ent >is not designed to work with > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Adam Cooper >Sent: 30 July 2008 02:35 >To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >Subject: [WSG] Firefox 3 and fieldset elements > >Hi all, > >

RE: [WSG] Firefox 3 and fieldset elements

0 July 2008 02:35 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Firefox 3 and fieldset elements Hi all, Just wondering if anyone can shed some light on this - I have a relatively positioned element with a nav element inside this. * The relatively positioned element has a 4em top margin and 40px top padding. * The

[WSG] Firefox 3 and fieldset elements

Hi all, Just wondering if anyone can shed some light on this - I have a relatively positioned element with a nav element inside this. * The relatively positioned element has a 4em top margin and 40px top padding. * The nav element is positioned absolutely (top 0; right 25px) with a negativ

Re: [WSG] Firefox and IE font sizes

James Thank you for your help. I have been going through what you suggested. I am not familular with JAVAScript, since I have heard problem stories (mainly screen readers and folks turning JAVA off) and seen bad implementations. I turned my focus to PHP. I am a newbie to all of this. I have been

Re: [WSG] Firefox and IE font sizes

On Sunday 27 July 2008 08:41:04 Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote: > At http://www.choroideremia.org/new/crf_header.php I have three buttons. > The first is "Decrease font size" the second is ?Default font size". And > the third is "Increase font size:. Firefox 3.0.1 shows them in 15 point > Arial

Re: [WSG] Firefox and IE font sizes

On Sunday 27 July 2008 08:41:04 Hayden's Harness Attachment wrote: > At http://www.choroideremia.org/new/crf_header.php I have three buttons. > The first is "Decrease font size" the second is ?Default font size". And > the third is "Increase font size:. Firefox 3.0.1 shows them in 15 point > Arial

[WSG] Firefox and IE font sizes

At http://www.choroideremia.org/new/crf_header.php I have three buttons. The first is "Decrease font size" the second is ?Default font size". And the third is "Increase font size:. Firefox 3.0.1 shows them in 15 point Arial font which I would say is good to default to. However, IE7 will show the

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Sorry folks, but am I missing something here? Why do you think that it is important to stuff something invisible inside an (otherwise) empty div? For some reason, Internet Explorer thinks an empty DIV - "" - contains text, and may create a

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

kevin mcmonagle Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 10:33 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height its used as a shim. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry folks, but am I missing something here? Why do you think that it is important to stuff

RE: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

AM >To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >Subject: Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height > >its used as a shim. > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Sorry folks, but am I missing something here? >> Why do you think that it is important to stuff something

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

its used as a shim. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry folks, but am I missing something here? Why do you think that it is important to stuff something invisible inside an (otherwise) empty div? Regards, Mike *** List Guide

RE: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

day, July 17, 2008 10:46 PM >To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org >Subject: Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height > >> Andrew Newman wrote re: using a DIV to enclose floats: >> >>> a little more valid / semantic >>> >>> div.clearer {

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

> Andrew Newman wrote re: using a DIV to enclose floats: > >> a little more valid / semantic >> >> div.clearer {clear: both; line-height: 0; height: 0;} >> >>   >> Of course, that will create an extra vertical space in the layout. If that space is unwanted, you could alternatively use this:

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

Andrew Newman wrote: a little more valid / semantic div.clearer {clear: both; line-height: 0; height: 0;}   On 17/07/2008, at 4:04 AM, kevin mcmonagle wrote: now i can validate. thank you -kevin *** List Guidelines: h

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

a little more valid / semantic div.clearer {clear: both; line-height: 0; height: 0;}   On 17/07/2008, at 4:04 AM, kevin mcmonagle wrote: Thank you david, a tip from that article has me sorted. I put a div at the bottom of the rapper content like this: .clear{clear:both} nice

RE: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of kevin mcmonagle > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:05 AM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Subject: Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height > > Thank you

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

These days it's also known how to do a clear without an additional clearing div... try giving the troublesome div overflow:hidden en you should also be sorted. On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:04 PM, kevin mcmonagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you david, > a tip from that article has me sorted. >

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

Thank you david, a tip from that article has me sorted. I put a div at the bottom of the rapper content like this: .clear{clear:both} nice trick just kind of forces, but I still dont understand why the outer wrapper would'nt scale automatically with three columns in an inner wrapper

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:08:47 +0100, kevin mcmonagle wrote: > hi, > I have a wrapper in that wont scale to its contained content/divs but there > are no > heights set in the divs that i can see. Is there something else that can > cause this? - Yes. If the content has A.P. blocks or floats that ar

[WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

hi, I have a wrapper in that wont scale to its contained content/divs but there are no heights set in the divs that i can see. Is there something else that can cause this? -best kevin *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 and script tag 'problems'

Ken McInnes wrote: > Most browsers will render this OK, BUT Firefox 3 WILL NOT. > It just renders the page with nothing on it. :-( I had a similar issue a fwe years ago in IE6, where a script tag with nothing inside (i.e. ) would cause IE6 to show a blank screen, although I think it was in a parti

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 and script tag 'problems'

http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/scripts.html#edef-SCRIPT "*Start tag: required, End tag: required*" http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#prohibitions "C.3. Element Minimization and Empty Element Content Given an empty instance of an element whose content model is not EMPTY (for example, an empty

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 and script tag 'problems'

; Does anyone have an example of this behaviour? Not quite sure I follow >> the issue... >> >> Regards, >> Mike >> >> >> >> >-Original Message- >> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 and script tag 'problems'

] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken McInnes > >Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:55 AM > >To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > >Subject: [WSG] Firefox 3 and script tag 'problems' > > > >G'day all, > > > >Just a quick 'heads up&#x

RE: [WSG] Firefox 3 and script tag 'problems'

Does anyone have an example of this behaviour? Not quite sure I follow the issue... Regards, Mike >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken McInnes >Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:55 AM >To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Thanks for your replies everyone. I finally got both versions working! 2008/6/23 Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008/06/23 11:42 (GMT+0100) Steve Green apparently typed: > >> You can still get some old versions from the Mozilla FTP site at >> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/fir

[WSG] Firefox 3 and script tag 'problems'

G'day all, Just a quick 'heads up' on Firefox 3 rendering compared with Firefox 2 rendering. If you 'self-close' a script element in the head, the validators will not pick it up as a problem - is is well formed xml (element is self-closed) and - it is validly placed (correctly placed within

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

On 2008/06/23 11:42 (GMT+0100) Steve Green apparently typed: > You can still get some old versions from the Mozilla FTP site at > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/ > It's ludicrous that they have removed some old versions - can they really > not afford the disk space?

RE: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

21 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate Hi Paul, You can download Firefox Ver 2.0 from . http://www.oldapps.com/firefox.htm This is a very good website for downloading older appz. -- Cheers to life Sagnik :: 26four79.com On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Paul Colli

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Thanks Sagnik, that is a good site! 2008/6/23 Sagnik Dey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Paul, > > You can download Firefox Ver 2.0 from . > > http://www.oldapps.com/firefox.htm > > This is a very good website for downloading older appz. > > -- > Cheers to life > > Sagnik :: > 26four79.com > > >

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all-older.html That's the official source. On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for your replies to this thread last week. I'm on a PC today > and trying to get both versions of Firefox running, the only issu

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Hi Paul, You can download Firefox Ver 2.0 from . http://www.oldapps.com/firefox.htm This is a very good website for downloading older appz. -- Cheers to life Sagnik :: 26four79.com On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for your r

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Hi all, Thanks for your replies to this thread last week. I'm on a PC today and trying to get both versions of Firefox running, the only issue is, I can't find where to download version 2 of Firefox anymore! Mozilla have made it very hard to find previous versions Does anyone know where you c

RE: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

select custom install and install it to another directory (something like /Mozilla/Firefox3) and the two will run side-by-side. You can do this with Opera too. :) Paul *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelin

Re: [WSG] Firefox rendering issue

hi lynette, make sure fire fox sees it correctly, then make corrections for ie. hth, dwain On 6/18/08, Lynette Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.americanmotorcycles.com.au/spyder.html > > IE displays as intended but since I made some changes to other parts of the > site, Firefox di

[WSG] Firefox rendering issue

http://www.americanmotorcycles.com.au/spyder.html IE displays as intended but since I made some changes to other parts of the site, Firefox displays incorrectly. It seems to want to put #contentdata directly under #box instead of under #contentpics. Can anyone see where I have gone wron

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3

all I have to do is create had to do was create a new profile and set shortcuts to load ff3 with the new profile. heres some info http://blog.codefront.net/2007/08/20/how-to-have-firefox-3-and-firefox-2-running-at-the-same-time/ 2008/6/18 Sajan Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It will replace the v

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3

It will replace the version 2 with the new one, and many of the plugins that works on version 2 gets disable since they aren't compatible. I did a mistake updating. Sajan On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008/06/18 13:17 (GMT+0100) Paul Collins appare

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Firebug (1.20b3 seems stable) and web developer toolbar both are now compatible with FF3. Make sure you get the versions from the Mozilla Add-ons pages as these are currently the most up to date. On a PC if you need to run both FF3and FF2 you can run the portable versions of either of them fro

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Got it Cortney thanks! Great little addon it is too. Kate - Original Message - From: "Cortney Sellers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:59 PM Subject: RE: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate Nope - I have firebug n FF 2 and am on a PC (I also have

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

firebug 1.2 works fine on FF3 and is available from the add-ons on the mozilla site: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843 Stew 2008/6/18 Ken Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quoting kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Ken, >> Its said this am that there is a problem and so no Firebug f

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Quoting kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Ken, Its said this am that there is a problem and so no Firebug for my FF3 at least. This was at the Mozilla site. [snip] Firebug is available for FF3 at the normal FF addons area. I just went to the ab

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

g > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:32 PM > *Subject:* Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate > > It will replace it even if you install into different directory. :-( > Then it means you are not going to have your FireBug available to work > with. > FF3 is very nice and I am excited. >

RE: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Nope - I have firebug n FF 2 and am on a PC (I also have a slew of other awesome extensions too) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kate Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 9:52 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Firefox 3

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Got it now thanksFirebug Kate - Original Message - From: "Ken Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:50 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate Quoting Jason Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It will replace it even if you install in

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Can some kind person tell me.. ..is Firebug only for the Mac as I have a PC. Thanks Kate - Original Message - From: "russ - maxdesign" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Web Standards Group" Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:47 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Ken, Its said this am that there is a problem and so no Firebug for my FF3 at least. This was at the Mozilla site. Kate - Original Message - From: "Ken Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:50 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:32 PM Subject: Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate It will replace it even if you install into different directory. :-( Then it means you are not going to have your FireBug available to work with. FF3 is very nice and I am excited. Just can&#

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Just check for Firebug at the Mozilla FF Add-On website, there´s a new version compatible with the FF3. Regards, Léo Siqueira [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19) 9111-2239 *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm U

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Jason Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It will replace it even if you install into different directory. :-( > Then it means you are not going to have your FireBug available to work with. > FF3 is very nice and I am excited. > Just can't wait for FireBug to become

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

James Ellis wrote: you can run either version from the relevant file location, but not at the same time. You can run any number of versions at the same time, but you have to use separate profiles - the profile can only be active in one instance at a time. You have to use the -no-remote comm

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Hi That's not exactly right .. if you install v3 to a different location (tip: choose Custom install) then you can run either version from the relevant file location, but not at the same time. The only problem you will find is compatibility with some extensions when you run FF3. If you want to

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

definitely a mac thing, not sharing libraries like windows dll hell... On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:47 PM, russ - maxdesign <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe a mac thing but I have have a variety of FF versions (as well as Moz, > Opera, Safari, IE and Netscape versions) going back in time on one lap

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Firebug 1.1 works fine on firefox3. Jason Grant wrote: It will replace it even if you install into different directory. :-( Then it means you are not going to have your FireBug available to work with. FF3 is very nice and I am excited. Just can't wait for FireBug to become compatible with it

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Quoting Jason Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It will replace it even if you install into different directory. :-( Then it means you are not going to have your FireBug available to work with. FF3 is very nice and I am excited. Just can't wait for FireBug to become compatible with it as it is so cruci

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

L PROTECTED] Per conto di Léo Siqueira Inviato: mercoledì 18 giugno 2008 14.41 A: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Oggetto: Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate Paul, When you start the installation you need to make the Custom setup and change the install directory, but you will need to create a new shortcut for

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Maybe a mac thing but I have have a variety of FF versions (as well as Moz, Opera, Safari, IE and Netscape versions) going back in time on one laptop and can open any as needed. The only limitation I've noticed with Moz related browsers is that you can only open one at a time. on 18/6/08 10:17 PM

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

if you have a mac you can rename it firefox3 so you can run it side by side, but your extensions might get confused... On Jun 18, 2008, at 13:17, Paul Collins wrote: Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox 2, or will it run side by side?! Cheers *

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3

On 2008/06/18 13:17 (GMT+0100) Paul Collins apparently typed: > Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox 2, or will > it run side by side?! It doesn't have to. There are instructions on the mozilla.org developer pages for running as many concurrent versions of Gecko products as

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Paul, When you start the installation you need to make the Custom setup and change the install directory, but you will need to create a new shortcut for the old version of FF. Regards, Léo 2008/6/18 Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

it will replace your version of Firefox. But you can now get the official release of FF3! Jonathan On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox 2, or will > it run side by side?! > > Cheers > > > *

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

It will replace it, unless you "backup" your Firefox 2 client and move it somewhere where Firefox 3 cannot get to it. /Svip 2008/6/18 Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox 2, or will > it run side by side?! > > Cheers > > > ***

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

It will replace it even if you install into different directory. :-( Then it means you are not going to have your FireBug available to work with. FF3 is very nice and I am excited. Just can't wait for FireBug to become compatible with it as it is so crucial for us of course. Regards, Jason www.fl

Re: [WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

It will replace, probably portable firefox2 an option to use both. Sundar On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox 2, or will > it run side by side?! > > Cheers > > > ***

[WSG] Firefox 3 candidate

Does anyone know if it will replace your version of Firefox 2, or will it run side by side?! Cheers *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm

[WSG] Firefox 3

Hi guys, Official launching date of Firefox 3 is on 17th June, 08, get it and enjoy and the below link for those who like to spread firefox (best in the business) all over the world. http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord Thanks Sundar **

Re: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

On 2008/05/21 07:43 (GMT+1000) Korny Sietsma apparently typed: > Sorry, I didn't mean "if I had FF3 running" - I had it *installed* but not > running. And maybe I could have made it work, but I was under time > pressure. I just installed FF2 through Ubuntu's standard "apt" system, and > I'd hoped

Re: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

Sorry, I didn't mean "if I had FF3 running" - I had it *installed* but not running. And maybe I could have made it work, but I was under time pressure. I just installed FF2 through Ubuntu's standard "apt" system, and I'd hoped that it would be configured to install it completely independently. Whe

Re: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

On 2008/05/20 18:27 (GMT+1000) Korny Sietsma apparently typed: > I have had problems running FF2 on a machine also running FF3 - > specifically, and fatally for me, FireBug wouldn't install cleanly in > FF2 if I had FF3 running. Did you ever think to try closing the other long enough to get it to

RE: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

> Korny Sietsma > Release Candidate 1 is out now, so hopefully things will get more > stable when Ubuntu picks it up, but at the moment it's a world of pain > - at least for my configuration! Beta5 and RC1 have been rock-solid on my systems (WinXP). And, as far as I understand, RC1 is fairly fea

Re: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

I have had problems running FF2 on a machine also running FF3 - specifically, and fatally for me, FireBug wouldn't install cleanly in FF2 if I had FF3 running. I'd load FF3 in a vmware image, or maybe test it with an Ubuntu 8.04 live CD. Note that beta 5 at least is still rather unstable. I've m

Re: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

On 2008/05/20 15:13 (GMT+1200) Paul Bennett apparently typed: > Ack! > Anyone else had horrible problems installing FF3? No, but ... > My install crashes every time I open it, so I had to reinstall FF2.. I avoid "installing" applications whenever possible. In the case of unreleased Gecko produc

RE: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

Ack! Anyone else had horrible problems installing FF3? My install crashes every time I open it, so I had to reinstall FF2.. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup

Re: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

If its a Beta I would say wait until its done before rewriting anything that is currently W3C CSS compliant. Remember beta means not done. If you are interested in judging beta releases test it an decide why its breaking. Are you currently fulfilling W3C standards. If you are and its break

Re: [WSG] firefox 3 beta5

On 19 May 2008, at 10:37, kevin mcmonagle wrote: Recently it was pointed out to me that a site I built is breaking in firefox 3 beta five. How close is this to release? RC1 just came out Do i need to worry about this? the site works fine in current browsers-firefox and otherwise. I'd b

[WSG] firefox 3 beta5

Recently it was pointed out to me that a site I built is breaking in firefox 3 beta five. How close is this to release? Do i need to worry about this? the site works fine in current browsers-firefox and otherwise. -thanks in advance kevin **

Re: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

On 4 May 2008, at 12:57, tee wrote: I'd just noticed that Firefox skips the dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing. Anybody knows if there is a workround? I assume you are using a Mac? Go into the OS X System Preferences, then Keyboard & Mouse, then Keyboard and set Full keyboard a

Re: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

On 7 May 2008, at 14:54, Scott Limmer wrote: Using the tabindex attribute on form elements should allow you to specify the tab order. This shouldn't help, and is likely to add confusion if there is anything on the page other than form controls. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk/ htt

Re: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

Using the tabindex attribute on form elements should allow you to specify the tab order. On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 9:57 PM, tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd just noticed that Firefox skips the dropdown and multi-select list > with tabbing. > Anybody knows if there is a workround? > > Thanks! >

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

Ok, I think I need to modify my comment a bit. It looks like Firefox has a dependency on Mac's keyboard access - it didn't occur to me to check out the System Preferences that something needed to enable because Safari has no problem. tee On May 5, 2008, at 7:32 PM, tee wrote: Ben, Thanks

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

Ben, Thanks for the tips. I thought I had the full universal access turned on, but was missing the full keyboard access. Geee, so much for Apple universal access - just like the one button mouse ! totally useless. tee On May 5, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Ben Dodson wrote: If it's a mac issue, the

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

efox/2.0.0.14 > > Good to see Magneto being put to good use. Still rebuilding my server to > take it with it's new approach to the database connecton. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of tee > Sent: 05

RE: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

oach to the database connecton. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tee Sent: 05 May 2008 00:11 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?) On May 4, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Essentia

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

On May 4, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Adam Martin wrote: I believe that this is a "mac" issue rather than firefox. I am guessing you are using mac - great too see you are using magento.. As an avid magento fan good too see more and more sites coming about. Adam - www.tweakmag.com Ah, the famous tw

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

On May 4, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd wrote: Just tabbed through the whole checkout forms in FireFox without any problems This is VERY ODD!!! What version of FF /platform do you use? I am on Mac, FF v2.0.0.14. I wish I can capture the tabbing in action so that I can

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

I believe that this is a "mac" issue rather than firefox. I am guessing you are using mac - great too see you are using magento.. As an avid magento fan good too see more and more sites coming about. Adam - www.tweakmag.com tee wrote: On May 4, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Diego La Monica wrote: Hi

RE: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

Just tabbed through the whole checkout forms in FireFox without any problems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tee Sent: 04 May 2008 23:35 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with

Re: R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

On May 4, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Diego La Monica wrote: Hi tee, can you provide an (un)working example? Here you are, http://74.52.59.43/index.php You need to add a product, then either use 'get a quote' (simple form) or go ahead with 'proceed to checkout', then select 'checkout as guest

R: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

2008 13.58 A: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Oggetto: [WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?) I'd just noticed that Firefox skips the dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing. Anybody knows if there is a workround? Thanks!

[WSG] Firefox skips dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing (?)

I'd just noticed that Firefox skips the dropdown and multi-select list with tabbing. Anybody knows if there is a workround? Thanks! tee *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://we

  1   2   3   4   >