On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:21 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
Hi Philippe,
Back at work. See inline replies below.
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once
experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults from triggering a secondary
mode
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once
experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults from triggering a
secondary mode
switch. Andreas told me this works like a charm on 83xx, and I
did not
see any issue on 52xx, 85xx or
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 15:21 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
Hi Philippe,
Back at work. See inline replies below.
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once
experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults from triggering a secondary
mode
Hi Philippe,
Back at work. See inline replies below.
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults from triggering a secondary
mode
switch. Andreas told me this works like a charm on 83xx, and I did not
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:26 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:00 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 14:01 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:00 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 14:01 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults from triggering a secondary mode
switch. Andreas told me this
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:26 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:00 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 14:01 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:26 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:00 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 14:01 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 19:31 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM,
Agreed, thanks to the DENX folks for having thought of it in the first
place, and organized it nicely.
I would like to start a
discussion about
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults from triggering a secondary mode
switch. Andreas told me this works like a charm on 83xx, and I did not
see any issue on 52xx, 85xx or 86xx either.
Can I get a version of that
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 14:01 -0400, Andreas Glatz wrote:
- powerpc32 updates for 2.6.30. Mainly to merge the once experimental
bits that prevent most alignment faults from triggering a secondary mode
switch. Andreas told me this works like a charm on 83xx, and I did not
see any issue on
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 19:48 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Ok. So, if we add the core skin fdtable, this leaves us with two items:
- signals in primary domain
- core skin fdtable
Ack. Add the following I-pipe stuff as well:
- nios2 design upgrade. Those
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 19:31 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM,
Agreed, thanks to the DENX folks for having thought of it in the first
place, and organized it nicely.
I would like to
Dear Philippe Gerum,
In message 1254510029.2703.355.ca...@redshift you wrote:
I just pushed this commit to my remote tree (ipipe-2.6.30-powerpc
branch); it should appear in a few hours once mirrored (cron job).
It's out (I manually triggered a sync :-)
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:39 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Philippe Gerum,
In message 1254510029.2703.355.ca...@redshift you wrote:
I just pushed this commit to my remote tree (ipipe-2.6.30-powerpc
branch); it should appear in a few hours once mirrored (cron job).
It's out (I
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:25 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 19:31 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM,
Agreed, thanks to the DENX folks for having thought of it in
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 19:48 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Ok. So, if we add the core skin fdtable, this leaves us with two items:
- signals in primary domain
- core skin fdtable
Ack. Add the following I-pipe stuff as well:
- nios2 design
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:59 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 19:48 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Ok. So, if we add the core skin fdtable, this leaves us with two items:
- signals in primary domain
- core skin
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Ok. How many interrupt controllers would be impacted by the PIC mute
feature?
Most of the ARM PICs (with their cascaded GPIOs). I have to admit that I
do not keep track of how many arm processors we actually support, but
there's a handful.
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:25 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 19:31 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM,
Agreed, thanks to the DENX folks for having
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 22:25 +0200, Patrice Kadionik wrote:
Hi all,
Philippe Gerum a écrit :
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 19:48 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Ok. So, if we add the core skin fdtable, this leaves us with two
items:
- signals in
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Peter Soetens wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
So
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
So if we answer positively, we'll delay the release ?
Peter Soetens wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
So if we answer positively,
Peter Soetens wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
So if we answer positively,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 16:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Peter Soetens wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
Peter Soetens wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 16:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Peter Soetens wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 19:31, Gilles Chanteperdrix
gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org wrote:
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would
Hi,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
True, it was an great opportunity to see and talk to you guys.
Here is a first list, please feel free to criticize it:
- signals in primary domain
Hi guys,
full of energy after this tremendous first XUM, I would like to start a
discussion about what people would like to see in the 2.5 branch.
Here is a first list, please feel free to criticize it:
- signals in primary domain (something that we almost forgot)
- xnsynch_acquire using
29 matches
Mail list logo
