[xmail] Re: Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 13:55 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: >I did get the final email, so in my case it's open relay. >Moreover, I personally believe that having then email received (but not >delieverd), is as bad. When you use that test, are you sending the email to an address that is not on your local server?

[xmail] Re: Is that correct?

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 13:30 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: >I have a user with a "*" alias. (aliases.tab = "relaydomain.com" "*" "info") > >I run the open relat test on: http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ > >Server was accepting relay: > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ><<< 250 OK > MA

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 12:54 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Which flavor of OS are you running? Your mention of ASP makes me think it > > might be Windows. If so, try the following from a command prompt: > > > > And see what you get back for each one. Again, using my own domain as an > > example, your session m

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 12:35 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: >Is that the way I should define it? > >Here's my smtprelay.tab: > >"164.149.214.100" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.101" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.102" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.103" "255.255.255.255" >"164.149.214.104" "255.255.255.255" >"16

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 11:53 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Yes, a lot thx. Your XMail machine cannot fire DNS queries *or* the target > > domain does not have neiher MX nor A records. > >My machine IS a DNS server as well, and the MX/A records are valid (I'm sure >because I can connect them and retrieve mail o

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 11:36 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > Use smtprelay.tab to restict relaying, not smtpauth.tab. Also you don't > > need smtpauth.tab for SMTP authentication. XMail does the first lookup > > inside the account database. Not sure what you men for "refferes". > > > >Sorry, I used smtprelay.tab

[xmail] Re: Xmail and Abuse.net

2003-07-14 Thread Tracy
At 11:31 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote: > > use mailproc.tab and "redirect" switch. > > see the doc für details. > >I set up relay succesfuly, for 3 different emails (1 is of an internal/local >domain, the other 2 are external domains accoutns) - the local user has got >the message, the other 2

[xmail] Cleanest writeup I've seen of the proposal that is being worked on

2003-07-12 Thread Tracy
This is forwarded from another mailing list >So the algorithm would become, I think: > >Suppose the IP 1.2.3.4 identifies using HELO (or EHLO) as "outmx.example.com": > >1) Lookup MX records for outmx.example.com. >If the IP address of one of the returned MX hostnames is 1.2.3.4, >mark

[xmail] Re: CheckMailerDomain and HELO/EHLO parameters

2003-07-12 Thread Tracy
At 15:45 7/12/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > As I understand it, the parameter to HELO/EHLO is treated as a domain name, > > and an MX lookup is done on that domain. If *any* MX record is returned, > > processing continues. If *no* MX records are returned, then an A lookup is > > done. If an A rec

[xmail] CheckMailerDomain and HELO/EHLO parameters

2003-07-12 Thread Tracy
have some suggestions for future versions - but I don't want to advance them until I am sure I understand what is done so far...) Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the lin

[xmail] Re: Bugger ...

2003-07-11 Thread Tracy
It's working just fine here. I have two separate filter EXEs - one returns 16 (to stop further processing but allow the message to continue), and the other returns 23 (to stop further processing and indicate the message was modified). Win2K Server SP3 Xmail 1.16 At 10:40 7/11/2003, Davide Libe

[xmail] Re: smtp.ipprop.tab - WhiteList=1 not quite working?

2003-07-10 Thread Tracy
At 20:15 7/10/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: >It should be cought by this. Check the spelling of "smtp.ipprop.tab" and >be sure there's a newline after the last " Grrr I looked at it a dozen times, and I had even copied it into the mail messages and was getting ready to send it when I noticed th

[xmail] Re: smtp.ipprop.tab - WhiteList=1 not quite working?

2003-07-10 Thread Tracy
At 19:59 7/10/2003, Andrew Joakimsen wrote: >Try not with the /32 for the subnet, but just the IP addres... Well, I was basing what I did on the example in the documentation, which shows: Example: "192.168.0.7/32" "WhiteList=1" Given that it shows the /32 on an address in the exa

[xmail] Re: smtp.ipprop.tab - WhiteList=1 not quite working?

2003-07-10 Thread Tracy
At 19:42 7/10/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > So, I figured with the new whitelist option in smtp.ipprop.tab I'd be in > > business. However, it doesn't appear to exempt an address from rDNS > > checking, only from MAPS checking. Unless I'm doing something wrong. > > Because the server I attempted

[xmail] smtp.ipprop.tab - WhiteList=1 not quite working?

2003-07-10 Thread Tracy
Greetings, Just put up 1.16, and wanted to try out the smtp.ipprop.tab for whitelisting an IP address. However, I don't seem to be able to get it to work. The IP address that I am whitelisting is a mail server that doesn't have an rDNS listing, but from whom I want to receive mail anyway. Now,

[xmail] Re: Windows domain authentication from XMail

2003-07-01 Thread Tracy
/POP3 or /SMTP folder to local.schmoo.org and it would authenticate local users, and you could use the regular authentication for web.schmoo.org. I don't see any other way to handle it. Not to say there's not another way, but At 13:54 7/1/2003, webmaster wrote: >Tracy this w

[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users

2003-06-12 Thread Tracy
At 18:15 6/12/2003, Kirk Friggstad wrote: >For another example (just discovered this today at >http://www.mynetwatchman.com/kb/security/ports/17/137.htm - scroll down to >the "False Positives" section at the end) - on a Windows web server, if >Netbios is bound to the public IP address of the server

[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users

2003-06-12 Thread Tracy
At 17:16 6/12/2003, Michael Harrington wrote: >Honestly, can you blame AOL for doing this? I can't even count how much >SPAM gets thrown at our system from people using their cable or DSL lines. No, I can't blame them for wanting to stop some of the spam. But one of the best solutions I've seen

[xmail] Re: how can I send to AOL users

2003-06-12 Thread Tracy
At 13:59 6/12/2003, webmaster wrote: >[<00>] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are >using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential) >554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this >IP >554- address until your ISP removes this IP address f

[xmail] Re: Bypassing RDNS check for specific addresses?

2003-06-12 Thread Tracy
At 10:50 6/12/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > Is there a way to cause XMail to "whitelist" an IP address or address block > > from MAPS/RDNS checking? I've got someone who runs a private mailing list > > on their server, but doesn't have reverse DNS set up (actually, they did, > > but their ISP mes

[xmail] Bypassing RDNS check for specific addresses?

2003-06-11 Thread Tracy
ere a way I can tell XMail to just let their server through without worrying about MAPS and/or RDNS? Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: Adding MAPS logging

2003-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 15:09 6/11/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: >1.16 will do SNDRIP=EIPMAP (%s) with %s == map-name Coolness...:) I'll be a happy camper then - for a while at least...:) Thanks...:) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

[xmail] Re: Adding MAPS logging

2003-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 14:37 6/11/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: >On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tracy wrote: > > > > > True - but the SMTP log doesn't indicate which maps list was used to > block > > > the IP. Since I'm just starting

[xmail] Re: Adding MAPS logging

2003-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 13:09 6/11/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: >On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tracy wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > I've heard a couple of people ask about logging for MAPS rejections, and I > > found that I wanted such a feature myself - so I grabbed a copy of the 1.15 &g

[xmail] Adding MAPS logging

2003-06-11 Thread Tracy
t; (the name is formatted like the rest, with a date in the file name). The format of the log file is: "Connecting IP" "Date/Time" "blocking maps domain" I have no objection if this code were to find it's way into the distribution set for XMail...:) Tracy

[xmail] Re: Windows domain authentication from XMail

2003-06-06 Thread Tracy
At 18:01 6/5/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > The file is located at: http://www.arisiasoft.com/misc/ntauth.zip > >Can you setup a simple HTML page and give me the link ? It is better to >have links to HTML pages instead of zip files directly. Sure. You can link to http://www.arisiasoft.com/misc/n

[xmail] Windows domain authentication from XMail

2003-06-06 Thread Tracy
27;s used, feel free to contact me. I'll try to answer them, although I don't know that I'll be able to...:) Good luck. The file is located at: http://www.arisiasoft.com/misc/ntauth.zip Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body

[xmail] Re: Why XMail has pop3lock inside?

2003-06-04 Thread Tracy
At 01:13 6/4/2003, Wang Hu wrote: >I got same problems. See my message "Can I make two or more pop3 = >connections >of XMail with same account concurrently?" in this group. > >It seems due to pop3-lock in XMail which allows only one pop3 session = >for >each account at the same time. > >I don't kno

[xmail] Re: External Password Authentication

2003-06-04 Thread Tracy
AIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy >Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] Re: External Password Authentication > > >At 17:45 6/3/2003, webmaster wrote: > >I am not a programmer by any means so tha

[xmail] Re: External Password Authentication

2003-06-04 Thread Tracy
At 17:45 6/3/2003, webmaster wrote: >I am not a programmer by any means so thats a little over my head, unless >you know where someone has already done this and they have scripts or code >to offer? Well, I could set up a test domain locally and try it here... Probably be tomorrow sometime before

[xmail] External Password Authentication

2003-06-04 Thread Tracy
Sorry for the new mail/thread, I lost the original when my mail client crashed Seems to me that if you just want to do authentication of POP3 and SMTP user accounts, and you're running a single NT domain and mail domain, you could do that easily enough using External Authentication. As I un

[xmail] Re: R: Re: R: Re: smtp authentication

2003-06-04 Thread Tracy
At 11:29 6/3/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote: >On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Cianferotti Leonardo wrote: > > > > I have tried to raise smtp after pop3, shaping the following line: =20 > > "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "0" =20 > > I have then ablitato the authentication by smtp: =20 > > "AllowSmtpVRFY" "1" =20 > > Inolte

[xmail] Re: Login fails

2003-05-31 Thread Tracy
At 14:53 5/30/2003, Henri van riel wrote: > > Try going in directly...? > > > telnet 110 > > user > > pass > > list > > quit > > > If that works, then the mail server is working, and the problem is with > > your MUA > >I already tried that with the same result: > >I get '-ERR Invalid auth or

[xmail] Re: Login fails

2003-05-31 Thread Tracy
Try going in directly...? telnet 110 user pass list quit If that works, then the mail server is working, and the problem is with your MUA At 14:36 5/30/2003, Henri van riel wrote: >Hello! > >I was finally able to adapt XMail to run on the uClibc based >router/gateway project fli4l (www

[xmail] Filter question

2002-11-29 Thread Tracy
go down the search order, or will it stop with that file and not look any farther, even though there are no commands in there? Thanks for any help on this. Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For genera

[xmail] Re: Interesting project ...

2002-11-03 Thread Tracy
. At 12:56 11/3/2002 -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: >On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Tracy wrote: > > > I've been playing around with writing one of these in .NET - but I haven't > > gotten it working right yet... If I ever do, I'll put the source up > > somewhere... >

[xmail] Re: Interesting project ...

2002-11-03 Thread Tracy
I've been playing around with writing one of these in .NET - but I haven't gotten it working right yet... If I ever do, I'll put the source up somewhere... At 12:09 11/3/2002 -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: >Anyone that want to try to have this to work as an XMail filter : > >http://slashdot.org

[xmail] Re: Relay problems

2002-10-23 Thread Tracy
Sorry - I usually capitalize file names to differentiate them from the surrounding text. However, I will note your preferences. At 09:23 10/23/2002 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: >On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Tracy wrote: > > > SMTPRELAY.TAB controls this. If you want your local domain user

[xmail] Re: Relay problems

2002-10-23 Thread Tracy
SMTPRELAY.TAB controls this. If you want your local domain users to be able to send e-mail outside your domain, you have two choices: 1) Enter the IP subnet for your local domain into SMTPRELAY.TAB (this will allow anyone using those IP addresses to send mail outside your domain), or 2) Have yo

[xmail] Re: local relay?

2002-10-17 Thread Tracy
How is your web site sending the mails? The error you are listing seems to indicate that the SMTP session to send the mail is never issuing a proper HELO or EHLO command At 16:35 10/17/2002 +0200, Tom Svensson wrote: >Hello, > >I've been dealing with this problem for a couple of days now,

[xmail] Re: Test

2002-09-29 Thread Tracy
> This mail swas sent by telnetting to your server and enterint commands >manually > > which accounts for all the typos...:) > > > > If you get this, then your server itself is working. > > > > If not, well, we'll never know, eh? :) > > > > Tracy

[xmail] Re: Mail never arrives

2002-09-29 Thread Tracy
Tell me an e-mail address to send to on that server, and I'll try to send you an e-mail and see what error comes back... At 15:40 9/29/2002 -0700, Michael Mehrle wrote: >I set up xmail as described yesterday but now, after my MX entries have >been switched over - messages never arrive (test me

[xmail] Re: eyeXmail - more than one command

2002-09-29 Thread Tracy
index was not working properly - this is fixed. The GetList function on the collection classes was broken - this is fixed. Tracy At 15:27 9/25/2002 +0200, Guillaume Devoyon wrote: >hello Tracy, >if you want i can do tests with you'r application.. > >Guillaume Devoyon > >

[xmail] Re: eyeXmail - more than one command

2002-09-25 Thread Tracy
I have a class library I wrote in VB.NET which handles all this (including using standard TCP to communicate - ie. not using external programs for the communications with the server). It exposes everything as an object model, and maps the object model to the underlying control commands. It is

[xmail] Re: New error message ! Hurray !!

2002-09-20 Thread Tracy
At 16:20 9/20/2002 +, Spyros Tsiolis wrote: >--- >root@jeckyl:~# telnet . 6017 >Trying 127.0.0.1... >Connected to .. >Escape character is '^]'. >-00140 Server does not like Your IP >Connection closed by foreign host. >--- Check y

[xmail] Re: Problem with SMTP

2002-07-01 Thread Tracy
Odd question, perhaps meaningless... Do you, by chance, have a * alias specified for your domain (not for a user, but for the actual domain alias)? At 17:34 7/1/2002 +0100, Phin Pope wrote: >Davide, > >The curious nature of the problem is that everyone can access port 25 from >inside our networ

[xmail] Re: Relaying question

2002-06-20 Thread Tracy
At 10:35 6/21/2002 +0800, Adrian Hicks wrote: >* Restart Xmail >* do: telnet localhost 6017 (the admin program gives the timestamp etc. & >waits for input - all seems ok at this point) >* do: "username" "password" and hit enter > >And I get a bad

[xmail] Re: Rejecting users at RCPT TO:

2002-06-15 Thread Tracy
..:) Perhaps I did something wrong the first time... Are those settings, per chance, cached? If so, that might be where I ran into problems before (this time I stopped XMail prior to changing the setting) Thanks. Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail&q

[xmail] Rejecting users at RCPT TO:

2002-06-14 Thread Tracy
ilboxes for these invalid addresses, if I can mark the addresses as invalid by doing so. I'll take any suggestions. Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: smtp

2002-06-13 Thread Tracy
At 11:12 6/13/2002 +0200, Maarten Weyn wrote: >[<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was: > >The maximum number of delivery attempts has been reached This means that there was a message in the queue that was awaiting delivery and it failed. IIRC, the default for delivery is to make 32 attemp

[xmail] Re: smtp

2002-06-12 Thread Tracy
I solved this by putting my local network into smtprelay.tab (which allows me to send without authentication), then turning on: "EnableAuthSMTP-POP3" "1" in the server.tab file. Then I have all my external mail clients enable SMTP authentication in their mail client software. There may be o

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 13:52 6/11/2002 -0500, Juan H. Medina wrote: >/var/MailRoot/bin/18849: No such file or directory. Looks like you're missing a space between your XMail Bin folder and the PID - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] F

[xmail] Re: message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 15:03 6/11/2002 +0200, Roman Dusek wrote: >I am getting quite the same headers - recepient's address >([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is only deep inside Received:... header and in >To: header that can be hidden using Bcc. So where should the client >mailserver get the right address from? Very right you a

[xmail] Re: message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
MAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The mail client has to be getting the original recipient somewhere, which means it has to be preserved by XMail when the mail is redirected by the * alias. At 08:54 6/11/2002 -0400, Tracy wrote: >Set up a single mailbox and assign the * alias to that mailbo

[xmail] Re: message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
Set up a single mailbox and assign the * alias to that mailbox. That should direct all mail into that single mailbox - and the original recipient address will remain in place (I have a similar setup, and I use my mail client to sort based on the original recipient address). At 14:47 6/11/2002

[xmail] XMail (1.5) extended session logging - possible?

2002-06-10 Thread Tracy
Is it possible to enable extended logging? By this I mean having the log files contain a transcript of the session for each session? I need to track down some weird mails, and having a log containing all the session information for each session would be helpful... - To unsubscribe from this l

[xmail] Re: IMAP Service in XMail

2002-06-05 Thread Tracy
, it's not possible to tell if the content in the mail is simply text and HTML, or if there's a real attachment, or whatever else might be there... Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: IMAP Service in XMail

2002-06-05 Thread Tracy
At 15:00 6/5/2002 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote: >status info, etc... also the server has to perform tasks that are not >usually done by a server ( like parsing mime files ) and this increase >also the cpu utilization. Amen to that... I'm in the process of writing a web based client for reading e

[xmail] Re: Invalid Address Bouncing..

2002-05-30 Thread Tracy
At 15:19 5/30/2002 +0100, Lee Rich wrote: >After running several tests against the xmail server, I've noted that >messages sent to an invalid address don't seem to be replying and >informing the sender. Or for that matter, informing the postmaster account >that a message has been sent to an inv

[xmail] Re: Fwd: Spam relay (again)

2002-05-02 Thread Tracy Martin
ERELAY means that the message was rejected. It was not delivered. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 13:42 > To: Davide Libenzi > Subject: [xmail] Re: Fwd: Spam relay (again) > > > > Davide

[xmail] Re: More XMail Control protocol questions

2002-04-25 Thread Tracy Martin
PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: More XMail Control protocol questions > > > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Tracy Martin wrote: > > > As I'm going through the control commands, I note that there are > > commands for adding, deleting, listing, and enabling pop links. > &g

[xmail] More XMail Control protocol questions

2002-04-25 Thread Tracy Martin
pop link using the control protocol? Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: User Variables

2002-04-22 Thread Tracy Martin
> it gets loaded but it's obviously not used OK, that's about what I expected. So it's pretty much anyone's guess what I might find there - just treat it as opaque string data pairs and carry on. Thanks...:) Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

[xmail] User Variables

2002-04-22 Thread Tracy Martin
recognize and parse additional data if it's added? I guess, basically, what I'm asking is: are User Variables considered dead storage for just anything the admin wants to put in there, or do they have some defined meaning to the server? Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send t

[xmail] Re: Mailing list options

2002-02-18 Thread Tracy Martin
Great! I'll download it and upgrade my server. Are there any major "gotchas" in going from 1.0 to 1.5 directly (things like message store format changes or anything)? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi > Sent: Monday, Feb

[xmail] Mailing list options

2002-02-18 Thread Tracy Martin
is available in XMail (I'm still running 1.0 - I haven't checked later version to see if it's available)? And, if it's not available, what would it take to get it added as a feature? Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the

[xmail] Re: Filtering mail for specific mailbox

2002-01-17 Thread Tracy Martin
t; > > On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Tracy Martin wrote: > > > > > 1) Block all mail to a specific mail address (I have > > > > a "*" alias, but I want to bounce mail addressed to > > > > a particular alias rather than having it reach me), > >

[xmail] Re: Filtering mail for specific mailbox

2002-01-17 Thread Tracy Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > spam-address.tab I'll take a look - but the impression I got of that when I was reading the docs is that it will block *all* mail from that address/domain, rather than mail addressed only to a specific user. Going back to look again now... Tracy - To unsubscrib

[xmail] Filtering mail for specific mailbox

2002-01-17 Thread Tracy Martin
ROTECTED] to any local address except [EMAIL PROTECTED] Suggestions (other than client-side filtering rules, which is not an option per the executive mandate)? Tracy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For g

[xmail] Re: Maximum number of tenatives reached

2001-12-09 Thread Tracy Martin
Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 20:26 > To: XMail mailing list > Subject: [xmail] Re: Maximum number of tenatives reached > > > On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Tracy Martin wrote:

[xmail] Re: Maximum number of tenatives reached

2001-12-09 Thread Tracy Martin
Good catch on the space - I completely missed that. However, I'm trying to figure how the space got there in the first place. This is an address that originated from the end user's mail application (Outlook Express, if I recall correctly), and the mail application itself should strip trailing spa

[xmail] Re: Maximum number of tenatives reached

2001-12-07 Thread Tracy Martin
#x27;ll try my best quit Connection to host lost. C:\> Any other ideas? Note that the DNS being used to resolve the name in NSLOOKUP is the same DNS that is set up for the machine running XMail... Tracy > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

[xmail] Maximum number of tenatives reached

2001-12-07 Thread Tracy Martin
ot;about.com ""[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED] " "S19791""RECV=OK" "" "1752" Note that I can do an NSLOOKUP for the MX server for about.com and telnet to port 25 on it with no problem, so I don't k

RE: Closing an Open Relay

2001-10-02 Thread Tracy Martin
server open to anyone who wanted to spoof your DNS name. Tracy > -Original Message- > From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 13:52 > To: Scott Ritchie > Cc: Tracy Martin; XMAIL > Subject: Re: Closing an Open Relay > > &g

RE: Closing an Open Relay

2001-10-02 Thread Tracy Martin
r/pass, use the same ones as for POP3. You can choose the password security level that suits your needs in the client software as well. Tracy Martin > -Original Message- > From: Scott Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 13:13 > To: Davide Libenz

RE: [xmail] Widespread Use?

2001-09-21 Thread Tracy Martin
Well, obviously I can't speak for others, but I have it running on a Win2K Server handling thousands of pieces of mail per day for 15 - 20 users. The machine it's running on hasn't been rebooted in over a month. No strain, no problems (so far)...:)   Took a little doing to get everything co

<    1   2   3   4