On 12-10-08 05:03 PM, Chris Tapp wrote:
On 8 Oct 2012, at 21:30, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
snip ...
Thanks for the really fast response on this :-)
For denzil, try with this by creating a new file in
meta-cedartrail/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.2.bbappend.
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend :=
On 12-10-09 09:16 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This commit removes fishriver bsp from meta-intel layer.
Fish-River-Islnad-2 hardware and BSP has made this
Fish-River-Island hardware and BSP absolute.
Also we discussed this on the Yocto
On 12-10-10 7:18 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:07 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; Hart, Darren; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCHv2 4/5] fishriver
On 12-10-13 10:16 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I'm about to start with my Xilinx ZC702 development board, and I was
wondering if there are any updates planned to the meta-zynq repository?
There are updates planned, but with some vacations (mine and others), since
that last update things
On 12-10-13 10:43 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi Bruce,
On Oct 13, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
There are updates planned, but with some vacations (mine and others), since
that last update things slowed down a bit. But work is proceeding,
I expect
On 12-10-13 12:05 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
I just took a quick look both the repos
My initial reaction is that I think Philip's repo appears to better structured,
and attempts to use the xilinx kernel and u-boot repos, which for these targets
is a good thing, given the state of the
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Elvis Dowson elvis.dow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Philip,
I made the following changes to your repo, since it was giving a warning
about apps-console-core being no longer valid, and yocto replacing it with
splash.
diff --git a/conf/machine/zynq-zc702.conf
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:38 AM, b40...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Chunrong Guo b40...@freescale.com
fix perf ERROR: oe_runmake failed
Signed-off-by: Chunrong Guo b40...@freescale.com
---
.../perf/files/define-attribute-const.patch| 13 +
On 12-11-20 10:09 AM, Venkata ramana gollamudi wrote:
Poky allows to build custom Linux for you, but we have cases where the post
build customization is required, like user-addition, network configuration,
service control. Even selecting the required packages can be a post build
activity.
On 12-11-27 05:23 AM, Yu Pan wrote:
I started looking at Yocto 2 weeks back. Despite the complexity in
kernel building, I found it quite hard to locate information on
preempt-rt build. I was trying to build linux-yocto-rt for beagleboard
from danny and the linux-yocto-3.4 kernel, and it seems to
On 12-11-28 01:07 AM, Yu Pan wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for commenting :-)
You shouldn't have needed to do this part, since the board already has
a preempt-rt BSP description:
On 12-11-28 01:07 AM, Yu Pan wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for commenting :-)
You shouldn't have needed to do this part, since the board already has
a preempt-rt BSP description:
On 12-12-03 02:06 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Initial checkin for the Rangeley 32-bit Machine
branch. This machine is based on the Avoton SoC
with nCPM.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
---
On 12-12-05 09:42 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Andreas Schweigstill andr...@schweigstill.de
wrote:
I have also tried to build a kernel and root filesystem for Zynq but the kernel
gets stuck when booting, regardless if on the ZC702 board or on Qemu. I tried
Poky
On 12-12-05 01:09 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Some candid feedback from someone struggling with their build. They
specified a non-master branch on the SRC_URI but had not added a
KBRANCH, so bitbake fetched everything, but do_kernel_checkout checked
out the master branch.
This sort of disconnect
On 12-12-05 01:15 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 12/05/2012 06:46 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-12-05 09:42 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Andreas Schweigstill
andr...@schweigstill.de wrote:
I have also tried to build a kernel and root filesystem for Zynq
On 12-12-04 01:11 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
Resending the patch for enabling the 32-bit support for
rangeley machine by resuing the existing rangeley branch.
Please pull them into linux-yocto-3.4/meta.
merged and pushed.
Bruce
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com wrote:
On 9 Dec 2012, at 00:11, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.comwrote:
Is it possible to have more than one bbappend applied to a recipe?
I'm using meta-cedartrail with
On 12-12-09 5:48 AM, Chris Tapp wrote:
On 9 Dec 2012, at 04:47, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com
mailto:opensou...@keylevel.com wrote:
On 9 Dec 2012, at 00:11, Chris Larson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Chris Tapp
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Marco koansoftw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I was used to work with oe-classic.
When I used oe-classic, often I used the 'devshell' option to try to
compile (make uImage) the kernel with the entire environment set up
correctly.
Now if I do the same procedure
On 12-12-11 06:44 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
In response to much feedback on the linux-yocto recipes and the associated
kernel tools, we have made a number of improvements in an attempt to
make them
more accessible. In particular, the tools now allow for using your own
sources
and configurations in
On 12-12-13 5:51 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-12-13 14:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, David Nyström wrote:
Hi,
Hmm,
This will lead to these variables beeing append:able but
non-overridable in image layer, as an(un?)intended consequence,
right ?
Br,
David
Sent from my
On 12-12-18 10:45 AM, Marco C. wrote:
2012/12/9 Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com:
As Chris said, this way should still work, and it does work here for me.
There's
one thing that you may notice with kernel's that have split source/build
dirs
(like linux-yocto), is that once you have gone
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:
poking around kern-tools for purpose of documenting some stuff and
ran across this in updateme:
split_command_line_objects() {
command_line_values=$@
for v in $command_line_values; do
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lai Eddy eddy.lai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m using yocto 1.3 (poky-8.0) with jasperforest BSP,
sometimes “bitbake core-image-minimal” did create files in
/tmp/work/xxx-poky-linux/linux-yocto-xxx/linux-xxx-standard-build , but
always create new image in
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day
rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:
poking around kern-tools for purpose of documenting some stuff and
ran across this in updateme:
split_command_line_objects
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Rick Yang rick.y...@enea.com wrote:
Hi ,
We have a linux release base on yocto, and we want to use
yocto-kernel-tools to manage kernel configuration fragments, instead of the
old method. So we want to know, when poky will use yocto-kernel-tools to
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:
i just noticed, in the poky-extras layer,
kern-tools-native_git.bbappend, which describes itself as for local
kern-tools work.
is there a use case for this? oe-core already supplies
kern-tools-native, and
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:
as i celebrate christmas by clawing my way thru the code, i run
across pedantic nitpickery like this:
I'm pretty sure if you dig in your email archives, you'll see me asking you
to
cc' me directly on anything
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
I'm pretty sure if you dig in your email archives, you'll see me
asking you to cc' me directly on anything linux-yocto or kern-tools,
since they are both areas that I
On 13-01-02 04:11 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
On 1/2/2013 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-12-24 02:59 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
Hi,
Catching up on email from the holidays. Did you ever get an answer
to this ?
Not yet, resumed my quest today.
I'm a yocto mostly-newbie, trying
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Brian Smucker b...@bsmucker.eu.org wrote:
On 1/2/2013 1:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-01-02 04:11 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
On 1/2/2013 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-12-24 02:59 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
Hi,
Catching up on email from
thing.
Bruce
Brian
On 1/2/2013 2:15 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Brian Smucker b...@bsmucker.eu.org
mailto:b...@bsmucker.eu.org wrote:
On 1/2/2013 1:12 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-01-02 04:11 PM, Brian Smucker wrote:
On 1/2/2013 10:06
On 13-01-15 12:54 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
Thank you for directing me toward that documentation. As it happens, I
have already read that, and it doesn't apply.
The section you mentioned begins with this text:
While it is always preferable to work with sources integrated into
the Linux
On 13-01-15 12:59 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 15, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Brian Lloyd bll...@familyhonor.net
mailto:bll...@familyhonor.net
wrote:
The kernel is a special case, where the SDK is really designed for
developing user applications (which the kernel is not).
Yes, it's clear to
On 13-01-15 01:26 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 15, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-01-15 12:54 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
Thank you for directing me toward that documentation. As it happens, I
have already read that, and it doesn't apply
On 13-01-22 03:28 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 01/15/2013 10:38 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
I finally found the entries that I was recalling earlier. They are:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=241
https
On 13-01-22 03:38 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Here is a commit which adds an scc file for emgd-1.16 feature. It
depends on the emgd-1.16 branch in the kernel repo, for which a pull
request is already sent.
This commit keeps the emgd-1.14
On 13-01-21 06:19 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I have created a branch for emgd-1.16 kernel driver for the v3.4
kernel repo over here.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/linux-yocto-2.6.37-contrib/log/?h=nitin/emgd-1.16
It consists of mainly following 2 commits on top of the
On 13-01-22 03:38 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Here is a commit which adds an scc file for emgd-1.16 feature. It
depends on the emgd-1.16 branch in the kernel repo, for which a pull
request is already sent.
This commit keeps the emgd-1.14
On 13-01-22 9:26 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-01-22 03:28 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
One problem I ran into … When I tried to execute make scripts, I got a whole bunch of
config questions that I *think* should
On 13-01-23 12:14 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-01-22 9:26 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
If I just hold down the Enter key, I believe all the defaults are taken, and
I eventually *do* get hostprogs that execute,
On 13-01-23 12:34 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-01-23 12:14 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-01-22 9:26 PM, Patrick Turley
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Daniel Kenji Morgan
daniel.kenji.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm still fairly new to Yocto, and having some trouble with kernel
packaging taking an extremely long time.
I will try and keep details as simple as possible to explain my situation.
I am
On 13-01-24 02:58 PM, John Mehaffey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Patrick Turley
patricktur...@gamestop.com mailto:patricktur...@gamestop.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote
Hi all,
We now have a more up to date kernel repository for contributions to
the linux-yocto kernel or linux-yocto meta data (configs, patches).
(Michael indulged me and help set this up really quickly, so he gets
all the credit for the work on this).
Enough rambling, and onto the link:
On 13-01-28 12:47 PM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if SRC_URI has some limitations as to where it will be
expanded.
I have a bsp with 2 kernel recipes. One for mainline, the other for the
yocto kernel.
The kernel may be used with some middleware that requires some
On 13-01-28 01:34 PM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote on 28/01/2013
18:01:57:
[snip]
I suspect the kernel fragment issue is down to the fact that a yocto
kernel recipe is not being used,
i.e. it relies on the yocto kernel meta data mechanism
On 13-01-28 01:35 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-01-28 01:34 PM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote on 28/01/2013
18:01:57:
[snip]
I suspect the kernel fragment issue is down to the fact that a yocto
kernel recipe is not being used,
i.e
On 13-01-29 06:24 AM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote on 28/01/2013
18:56:02:
Why is the SRC_URI containing the additional patches applied when
referenced directly in the bb file,
but not when referenced in an include or scc file?
Keeping
On 13-01-28 11:16 AM, Daniel Kenji Morgan wrote:
Sorry to bring up an old post, but I haven't managed to find information in the
mail archives and bugzilla on how the issue stands as of today.
The post I am referring to is as follows:
On 13-02-01 7:48 PM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 31, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-01-23 10:17 AM, Patrick Turley wrote:
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Bruce Ashfieldbruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
wrote:
On 13-01-23 12:34 AM, Patrick Turley
On 13-02-01 11:35 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote:
While, I'm not an expert, I would like to point out:
http://kernel.org/doc/index-old.html (the new index references this but
the information isn't on the new index page directly).
One thing mentioned is that a make distclean is required for reasonable
have
problems where I can't run the cross compiled tools, so my personal
recent experience is limited as well as bad parameters issues from using
the wrong compiler (as my compiler can generally make for both).
Brian
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 23:48 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-02-01 7:48 PM
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Rudolf Streif rudolf.str...@linux.comwrote:
I apologize if that has been brought up before.
The linux-yocto kernel recipes include the git tags into PV by explicitly
setting:
PV = ${LINUX_VERSION}+git${SRCPV}
This means that you cannot for example do
-b with the recipe file name is not an option since you
would not get the bbappends.
Cheers,
Rudi
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
mailto:bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Rudolf Streif
rudolf.str...@linux.com
On 13-02-08 6:18 PM, kishore.k.bo...@intel.com wrote:
From: Kishore Bodkekishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
This patch set is to remove the Cedartail Machine from
Linux-yocto-3.4 Kernel.
Cedartrail BSP will not be supported for Yocto 1.4 Release.
Also Please remove the standard/cedartrail branch.
On 13-02-12 6:47 PM, David Mulder wrote:
I need to use the uio-pci-generic kernel module, but I don’t know how to
make it available in my image.
Yocto 1.3, core-image-minimal, did ‘bitbake linux-yocto –c menuconfig’
and added “Generic driver for PCI 2.3”. It took a while to bitbake
On 13-03-01 03:53 AM, Satya Swaroop Damarla wrote:
Hi Rudy,
Thank you for the basic file... I have a question here... The git
directory is already saved on my work pc. What is the necessity to
download it again? The reason behind my asking this question is, it is
secured and so password is
On 13-03-01 11:42 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Given that Greg KH has publicly stated linux-3.8 is not a long term
stable kernel, is it worth the effort to support it in Yocto?
We don't need LTSI to make a kernel worth supporting. We pick our
kernels based on the timing of the Yocto release
On 13-03-01 02:15 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote:
Bruce,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
But note, Greg is talking specifically about LTSI, we don't
expect more than one LTSI per year, and we are already
On 13-03-05 12:35 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
So the topic branch commit is present much deeper in the branch with
different commit-id.
May be merging of the emgd branch resulted it. Is it issue with the
emgd branch rebased to an undesired point?
It shouldn't be. That commit shouldn't be
On 13-03-05 12:56 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 9:50 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: linux-yo...@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: v3.8 kernel recipes in meta-intel
On 13-03-05 12:35 PM
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called meta-dl. I am planning to add
scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well.
- http://insop.github.com/meta-dl/
FYI: I've already merged and
On 13-03-06 11:24 PM, Juri Lelli wrote:
Hi,
On 03/06/2013 08:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called meta-dl. I am planning to add
scheduler testing tools
at 8:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called meta-dl. I am planning to add
scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well
=${KBRANCH}
\
file://defconfig
PV = 3.8
-PR = dl7
+PR = dl
KSRC ?=
S = '${@base_conditional(KSRC, , ${WORKDIR}/git, ${KSRC}, d)}'
Thank you.
Insop
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi
and only
put the kernel options required to enable the feature.
Cheers,
Bruce
PV = 3.8
-PR = dl7
+PR = dl
KSRC ?=
S = '${@base_conditional(KSRC, , ${WORKDIR}/git, ${KSRC}, d)}'
Thank you.
Insop
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03
= '${@base_conditional(KSRC, , ${WORKDIR}/git, ${KSRC}, d)}'
Thank you.
Insop
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03-05 1:54 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called meta-dl. I
On 13-03-07 4:49 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Thanks Juri, I was going to add you to my linux-yocto-3.8 announcement
email and due to some last minute debug activities .. it slipped my
mind. So I'm using this thread to let you, and anyone else that is
interested know that sched_deadline support is
depends on what target you are using, and
if you are using the 'defconfig' that you mentioned earlier. Switching
to the linux-yocto policy and BSP fragments will likely fix your problem.
Bruce
Thank you,
Insop
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote
On 13-03-08 03:46 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mar 3, 2013, at 4:12 AM, Satya Swaroop DAMARLA swar...@weisser.at
mailto:swar...@weisser.at wrote:
hi Rudy, hi guys
Thank you for the chnages to be made. I always do in two steps, I
fetch all and then compile the image...
After fetching then I renamed
On 13-03-08 08:27 AM, Insop Song wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03-07 12:05 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Bruce,
That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl.
(https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/tree/linux-yocto-3.8
On 13-03-08 07:08 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main kernel module and
the rest are dependent on the first. Building and installing the
modules to the rootfs works fine. Next question is
On 13-03-08 12:03 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/07/2013 06:04 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-03-07 12:05 AM, Insop Song wrote:
Bruce,
That's very good. I will bring linux-yocto-3.8 kernel to meta-dl.
(https://github.com/insop/meta-dl/tree/linux-yocto-3.8)
I have another suggestion
On 13-03-08 12:40 PM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
8 mar 2013 kl. 18:12 skrev Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com:
On 13-03-08 07:08 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main kernel module
On 13-03-08 12:01 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/04/2013 08:04 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline scheduler, called meta-dl. I am planning to add
scheduler testing tools and different kernel versions as well.
-
On 13-03-08 2:00 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote:
On 2013-03-08 7:12, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Hans,
Le Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:08:21 +0100,
Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main
On 13-03-08 5:36 PM, David Mulder wrote:
Hi.
I’m running a 10us control loop by (under vxWorks) setting one thread’s
priority to max and not yielding ever (letting other tasks run on other
cores), but Linux seems to thwart that capability: Ubuntu swaps out my
thread occasionally for hundreds of
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Vin Shelton a...@alumni.princeton.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03-08 5:36 PM, David Mulder wrote:
I’m running a 10us control loop by (under vxWorks) setting one thread’s
priority to max
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Fredrik Markström
fredrik.markst...@gmail.com wrote:
The RT-throttling can be disabled with:
echo -1 /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
echo -1 /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us
But as mentioned in the other answers things like the system tick, ipi:s
On 13-03-09 5:32 AM, Insop Song wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03-08 12:01 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/04/2013 08:04 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi,
I am preparing a new meta layer for testing and promoting a
sched_deadline
On 13-03-11 09:28 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 13-03-08 2:00 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote:
On 2013-03-08 7:12, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Hans,
Le
On 13-03-11 09:46 AM, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Le Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:37:44 -0400,
Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com a écrit :
Can you post your exact changes where we can see them ? You need to put
the module_autload variable in a .conf file, whether that be your
local.conf
On 13-03-10 11:32 PM, Insop Song wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield
Expect that the yocto project hosted meta-realtime will appear in a
week or so. I'm doing the legwork at the moment, but with some travel
in the upcoming week, the initial push will be delayed by a few days
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Insop Song insop.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
As an example, I have a schedtool recipe that uses the
git://gitorious.org/sched_deadline/schedtool-dl.git
repository with a 4 patch
On 13-03-11 01:38 PM, David Mulder wrote:
From: Trevor Woerner [mailto:twoer...@gmail.com]
You can call sched_setaffinity() before fork()ing your task, or use
taskset on the cmdline.
Will that work on a core that's offline?
Nope. Only with an online core controlled by the Linux scheduler.
If
On 13-03-11 2:13 PM, David Mulder wrote:
Will that work on a core that's offline?
Nope. Only with an online core controlled by the Linux scheduler.
If you do end up trying to get AMP working, you need to plumbing
to load the other OS/kernel in a reserved memory location, set the
program
On 13-03-14 12:52 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi Bruce,
This is for adding rt-app, please let me know what you think.
For next patch, I will add schedtool_dl
This patch looks ok, what are the differences from your original
layer ? I've already imported changes from there, so I'd just
like to hear
On 13-03-14 12:52 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi Bruce,
This is for adding rt-app, please let me know what you think.
For next patch, I will add schedtool_dl
Reading this more closely, can you split this into two patches ?
We need to review this in chunks, patch 1 for the rt-app (it
looks fine),
On 13-03-14 10:09 PM, Insop Song wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've added recipes-kernel to use edf branch and cfg.
FYI: your email keeps bouncing from the linux-yocto mailing list,
check to be sure you signed up with your gmail account, I keep
approving them for now :)
- tested on qemux86
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Insop Song insop.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
FYI: your email keeps bouncing from the linux-yocto mailing list,
check to be sure you signed up with your gmail account, I keep
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Insop Song insop.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I've added recipes-kernel to use edf branch and cfg.
I was just merging your changes, and realized that gmail may have dropped
your schedtool-dl recipe.
Can you resend it with your updated series ? I have
On 13-03-14 11:44 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-03-14 11:36 PM, Insop Song wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. One of the arbiters is me .. if it doesn't work this time, let
me know
and I'll check the list membership.
I've just
On 13-03-15 06:33 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. In an effort to shrink our rootfs by some major numbers we found two
low-hanging fruits that we would like to address before cherry picking
and removing lots of good linux functionality. We have no need for the
uImage (3MB) stored in /boot and also
On 13-03-15 02:02 AM, Volker Vogelhuber wrote:
Volker Vogelhuber v.vogelhuber@... writes:
When I change to the build directory and start building the image using
bitbake, there seems to be a git call somewhere in the recipes that
switches the branch of the poky git checkout back to master. Of
On 13-03-15 04:47 AM, Insop Song wrote:
---
recipes-extended/images/core-image-realtime.bb |1 +
recipes-tools/schedtool-dl/schedtool-dl.bb | 23 +++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-tools/schedtool-dl/schedtool-dl.bb
diff --git
On 13-03-15 08:04 AM, Volker Vogelhuber wrote:
Hi,
Interesting. Are you working out of yocto/oe-core master ? The linux
yocto kernel support should always fail if the kernel source dir
isn't a git repo (or convert it into one) and not impact the main
yocto/oe-core tree.
As mentioned in the
On 13-03-16 6:16 AM, Insop Song wrote:
meta-realtime layer for testing sched_deadline and other real-time applications
Add rt-app, schedtool, define core-image-realtime, and append recipies-kernel
This looks good to me now, I still think we'll have some confusion
between the core rt images
On 13-03-18 04:34 AM, Florin Cristian Dan wrote:
Hello, i've managed to burn the BSP image (emenlow) on a usb stick, on
booted on my target machin, apparently it works fine, but i would like
to know how can i eliminate that 10 day timeout, i've tried to enter the
To answer this part of the
1 - 100 of 2361 matches
Mail list logo
