Thanks Blossom and Bill for your words. They really mean something
to me. I mean, you don't have to write them, you could just continue
what you were doing and forget about it. It is these experiences
that strengthen my will to help other people too, even with 'simply
words', instead of turning
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Smart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose we could get into a big discussion on the differences
between
> complex and simple tasks, parallel-tasking, multi-tasking, serial-
tasking,
> but frankly I'm not interested in building a complete set of
definiti
Bill, of course you are right. That's why I originally quoted 'allowed
in Zen'. Still thanks for waking me up - but next time just call my
name or poke me gently ;-)
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Smart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 04 Eugene wrote:
>
> >Why do you h
On Saturday, May 06 Eugene Wrote:
>Bill, of course you are right. That's why I originally quoted 'allowed
>in Zen'. Still thanks for waking me up - but next time just call my
>name or poke me gently ;-)
Eugene, I Whisper In Your Ear:
Your words 'allowed in Zen' was to what I was referring.
Ze
On Saturday, May 06 Eugene Wrote:
>And the practical approach in Ahmeds longer posting (9917), where he
>describes his handling boredom in classrooms, seems very OK to me. I
>can not judge how Zen masters would agree to his approach, but I
>think that is exactly how to handle these kind of situ
On Saturday, May 06 Eugene Wrote:
>They also convince my idea that, despite some disappointments, an
>open, even naive, attitude to the world ('empty' in Zen texts???) is
>well feasible and best for all.
I think you're on the right track here. A non-Buddhist Bodhisattva once
said 'you have to
Rodney,
I just wanted to let you know I typed a very long reply in response to
this, so I am not ignoring you. For whatever reason none of my posts
from yesterday have showed up on the forum.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
You can search right f
I wonder if the site is having technical problems, for the last week,
I've received less than half of the posts.
On 5/6/06, dkotschessa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rodney,
>
> I just wanted to let you know I typed a very long reply in response to
> this, so I am not ignoring you. For what
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, kahtychen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wonder if the site is having technical problems, for the last week,
> I've received less than half of the posts.
Seems that way.. I don't think that it's a moderated or somewhat
moderated group. The messages I wrote ar
From: "Eugene" >
What a blessing it is for all mankind that you continue to lurch forward
with your spiritual journey in spite of the soul-crunching attempts of some
insensitive clods to see you as the wonderfully benevolent positive force
that you are.
I hear much whining and enabling. So sorry.
Sorry about my misleading writing but I wasn't bored. I diverted my
attention to studying for other classes and planning for the future because
time is swiftly evaporating. So the cause was urgency amidst a fire.
I understand what you mean by I can learn a lot simply through attentive
observation
From: "Ahmed" < I am mindful when I multi-task.
I've become the worst possible thing: a hypocrite. I will choose more carefully when responding (e-mail, speech,
actions) according to affinity and necessity of my views.
time for another bong-hit, Akbar.
Yahoo! Groups
With palms together,
Good Morning All,
Multi-tasking is the great illness of the contemporary world. This disease is
a result of attempting to do more with less and not being aware of doing any
specific thing at all. It is a prescription for automated sleepwalking.
As workplaces de
i don't know what wu wei is,i have simply been studying the
act of sitting in zazen,sitting while attempting to be in
attention.
ive practiced placing breath and thought into the same path so
both don't exist without the other.
as if both were following each other on a pairalel line.
ive practice
14 matches
Mail list logo
