- was: Unconditional Love
At 10:36 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
Just hazarding a guess, but I
At 04:58 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 03:37 PM 11/6/2003, Ron Scott wrote:
President Benson
At 05:52 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
Ron Scott wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are some Korihors and wolves in sheep's
clothing. Ezra Taft Benson said so. grin --JWR
He did? When? Was he eyeballing his son? grin
Maybe he was eyeballing his grandson, Steve. double grin --JWR
Rotfl
--
Steven
At 03:40 PM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 10:17 AM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
At 04:50 PM 11/5/2003
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 03:40 PM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery
At 07:49 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
So for the moment I will abide your claims above. Meantime, please answer
the key question I asked earlier: Give us specific examples of ... how
secular humanism and athiesm are bigger threats to us today than they were,
say, a couple of hundred years ago.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 07:49 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
So for the moment I will abide your claims above
At 08:09 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 07:49 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
So for the moment I
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 08:09 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven
To me such worries have a familiar John Birchian
ring to them, no offense intended.
Ron Scott
Some people (on this list even) are singularly unoffended by the taint
of John Birchism. Or so I've noticed.
Tom
//
///
And I'll take the John Birchian comment as a compliment--thank you.
--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My point exactly! Sometimes I read through all the messages before
replying and other times I just dig in and start pushing the send button
without reading everything. Guess
At 11:43 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
Ron Scott wrote:
Well, by all means, clue them in as to what they've been missing. Be sure to
show how it correlates neatly with Mormon teachings.
Do I detect a note of sarcasm here.? LOL --JWR
More like a whole symphony grin.
--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL
At 10:36 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
Just hazarding a guess, but I suspect that most people, some
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
Ron Scott wrote:
Well, by all means, clue them in as to what they've been
missing. Be sure
-Ron-
Ah, the Church of Ezra resurrects itself. Who is its profit: Reed?
I don't understand this. Why would the prophet's words in General
Conference constitute the Church of Ezra? And why would Reed Benson
be called its profit? While I don't know Reed Benson personally, I
have had a few
Ron Scott wrote:
Ah, the Church of Ezra resurrects itself. Who is its profit: Reed?
Speaking of dead prophets, which are we to disdain more, Ezra Taft Benson
or Bruce R. McConkie? And after President Hinckley dies are we to discount
his words immediately, or should we wait an appropriate
At 12:48 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 11:43 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
Ron Scott wrote:
Well
single prophet, beginning with Joseph Smith. But, that's just my opinion.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
Ron Scott wrote:
Ah
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 12:48 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery
-
From: Stephen Beecroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
-Ron-
Ah, the Church of Ezra resurrects itself. Who is its profit: Reed?
I don't understand this. Why would
At 03:37 PM 11/6/2003, Ron Scott wrote:
President Benson was good enough for me. His politics were not. For
additional comments, see my response to your fellow traveler.
Ron Scott
That's fine. The politics can come later--as you gain more light and
knowledge grin. Which reminds me of a joke.
Ron Scott wrote:
It also troubling that some members of the Church, particularly those with
far right political views, think he is the only latter-day prophet worth
listening to.
Strawman. There are no such far right members still in the Church that I
am aware of. And I know an awful lot of the
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
Ron Scott wrote:
It also troubling that some members of the Church, particularly
those
-Original Message-
From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 03:37 PM 11/6/2003, Ron Scott wrote:
President Benson was good enough for me. His
Ron Scott wrote:
Ah yes. And no Korihors and wolves in sheeps clothing either, right John?
I'm pretty sure there are some Korihors and wolves in sheep's
clothing. Ezra Taft Benson said so. grin --JWR
//
/// ZION LIST
-Original Message-
From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
Ron Scott wrote:
Ah yes. And no Korihors and wolves in sheeps clothing either, right John
-Original Message-
From: Tom Matkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
Strawman. There are no such far right members still in the Church
that
I
am aware
Ron Scott wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are some Korihors and wolves in sheep's
clothing. Ezra Taft Benson said so. grin --JWR
He did? When? Was he eyeballing his son? grin
Maybe he was eyeballing his grandson, Steve. double grin --JWR
At 10:17 AM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
At 04:50 PM 11/5/2003 +, Gary wrote:
What is important is that we don't twist that love as did Nehor and as do
many today, to excuse their sinful natures.
Has anyone taken the time and energy to look at the Anti-Christs in the
Book of Mormon, such as
29 matches
Mail list logo
