At 05:52 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
Ron Scott wrote:
> I'm pretty sure there are some Korihors and wolves in sheep's
> clothing. Ezra Taft Benson said so. --JWR
He did? When? Was he eyeballing his son?
Maybe he was eyeballing his grandson, Steve. --JWR
Rotfl
--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTE
At 04:58 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 03:37 PM 11
ect: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
At 10:36 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:31 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ZION] Neh
Ron Scott wrote:
> I'm pretty sure there are some Korihors and wolves in sheep's
> clothing. Ezra Taft Benson said so. --JWR
He did? When? Was he eyeballing his son?
Maybe he was eyeballing his grandson, Steve. --JWR
///
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Matkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 7:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
>
>
> > Strawman. There are no such "far right&quo
> -Original Message-
> From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> Ron Scott wrote:
> >Ah yes. And no Korihors and wolves in
> Strawman. There are no such "far right" members still in the Church
that
> I
> am aware of. And I know an awful lot of the "far right" crowd being
one
> of
> them myself. --JWR
I'm only able to follow this logically if you are out of the Church now
John. Help me understand what you are tryi
Ron Scott wrote:
Ah yes. And no Korihors and wolves in sheeps clothing either, right John?
I'm pretty sure there are some Korihors and wolves in sheep's
clothing. Ezra Taft Benson said so. --JWR
//
/// ZION LIST CHART
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 03:37 PM 11/6/2003, Ron Scott wrote:
>
>
> >Pre
> -Original Message-
> From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 6:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> Ron Scott wrote:
> >It also troubling that some membe
Ron Scott wrote:
It also troubling that some members of the Church, particularly those with
"far right" political views, think he is the only latter-day prophet worth
listening to.
Strawman. There are no such "far right" members still in the Church that I
am aware of. And I know an awful lot of
At 03:37 PM 11/6/2003, Ron Scott wrote:
President Benson was good enough for me. His politics were not. For
additional comments, see my response to your fellow traveler.
Ron Scott
That's fine. The politics can come later--as you gain more light and
knowledge . Which reminds me of a joke. Somethi
ing to.
Ron Scott
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Beecroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> -Ron-
> > Ah, the Church of Ezra resurr
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 12:48 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
>
>
> > >
every
single prophet, beginning with Joseph Smith. But, that's just my opinion.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional L
At 12:48 PM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 11:43 AM 11/6/2003, you w
Ron Scott wrote:
Ah, the Church of Ezra resurrects itself. Who is its profit: Reed?
Speaking of dead prophets, which are we to disdain more, Ezra Taft Benson
or Bruce R. McConkie? And after President Hinckley dies are we to discount
his words immediately, or should we wait an appropriate mournin
-Ron-
> Ah, the Church of Ezra resurrects itself. Who is its profit: Reed?
I don't understand this. Why would the prophet's words in General
Conference constitute the "Church of Ezra"? And why would Reed Benson
be called its "profit"? While I don't know Reed Benson personally, I
have had a f
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 2:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 11:43 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
> >Ron Scott wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 1:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> Ron Scott wrote:
> >Well, by all means, clue t
At 10:36 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
> Just hazarding a guess, but I suspec
At 11:43 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
Ron Scott wrote:
Well, by all means, clue them in as to what they've been missing. Be sure to
show how it correlates neatly with Mormon teachings.
Do I detect a note of sarcasm here.? --JWR
More like a whole symphony .
--
Steven Montgomery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I te
Ron Scott wrote:
Well, by all means, clue them in as to what they've been missing. Be sure to
show how it correlates neatly with Mormon teachings.
Do I detect a note of sarcasm here.? --JWR
//
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Ple
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
> Just hazarding a guess, but I suspect that most people, some o
At 09:36 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
>
> And I'll take the "John Birchian" comment as a compliment--thank you.
>
>
> --
> Steven Montgomery
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
My point exactly! Sometimes I read through all the messages before
replying and other times I just dig in and start pushing the send button
>
> And I'll take the "John Birchian" comment as a compliment--thank you.
>
>
> --
> Steven Montgomery
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
My point exactly! Sometimes I read through all the messages before
replying and other times I just dig in and start pushing the send button
without reading everything. G
To me such worries have a familiar John Birchian
> ring to them, no offense intended.
>
> Ron Scott
Some people (on this list even) are singularly unoffended by the taint
of John Birchism. Or so I've noticed.
Tom
//
//
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 08:09 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
>
>
> > >
At 08:09 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 07:49 AM 11/6/2003, yo
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 07:49 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
>
> >So for th
At 07:49 AM 11/6/2003, you wrote:
So for the moment I will abide your claims above. Meantime, please answer
the key question I asked earlier: Give us specific examples of > ... how
secular humanism and athiesm are bigger threats to us today than they were,
say, a couple of hundred years ago.<
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 03:40 PM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
>
>
> > >
At 03:40 PM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 10:17 AM 11/5/2003, you
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ZION] Nehors - was: Unconditional Love
>
>
> At 10:17 AM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
> >At 04:50
At 02:24 PM 11/5/2003 -0700, St Steven wrote:
President Benson thought so. For instance, in his famous talk (Which he
gave over 37 different times. Not only in General Conference but to
Regional Conferences, Regional Representatives Seminars, reprinted as the
1st Presidency Message in the Ensig
At 10:17 AM 11/5/2003, you wrote:
At 04:50 PM 11/5/2003 +, Gary wrote:
What is important is that we don't twist that love as did Nehor and as do
many today, to excuse their sinful natures.
Has anyone taken the time and energy to look at the Anti-Christs in the
Book of Mormon, such as Nehor
36 matches
Mail list logo
