We're currently benchmarking RelStorage to see if it's a viable alternative
to ZEO.
We've come across the following problem: When trying to revert to an old
version of a page, we get a unicode error:
Traceback (innermost last):
Module ZPublisher.Publish, line 119, in publish
Module ZPublishe
I have a need to use ZEO authentication so prevent people from accidentily
connection to the wrong ZEO server. We had a Zope 2.10 client connect to a
ZEO server used for Zope 2.7 recently and try to create a Plone site and the
result was quite disastrous.
At the moment you can configure authen
This appears to be a CMFEditions problem not a RelStorage problem.
The ways to escalate a bug:
Write a test case that demonstrates the bug. Do it yourself.
a. Ensure tests fail reliably
b. Email the author with failing tests cases and software versions
to allow him to reproduce
c.
Alan Runyan wrote:
I have a feeling its CMFEditions because he is trying to do fancy stuff with the
transaction note(s) in the ZODB. At a gut level: I feel 100x more comfortable
with Shane's code (ZODB/RelStoage) than CMFEditions. Which is notoriously
insane.
Thanks. :-) However, early vers
Shane,
I'm using this buildout for Plone 3:
http://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/collective.relstorage/trunk/
Which is using RelStorage from:
svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/relstorage/trunk/relstorage
Thanks
Ben
On 23/04/2008 16:12, "Shane Hathaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Runyan
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I would like to get that fix in for Zope 2.11, which will use ZODB 3.8. Are
there any objections to changing this there as well? This is a bit of a grey
area between a bugfix and completing an unfinished feature, and I'm do not
know what the rules for ZODB development ar
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I would like to get that fix in for Zope 2.11, which will use ZODB
3.8. Are there any objections to changing this there as well? This is
a bit of a grey area between a bugfix and completing an unfinished
feature, and I'm do not know what the rules
On Apr 23, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
...
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9.
Not actively.
Could we move those major changes into ZODB 3.10 and create ZODB 3.9
with only modest feature enhancements, then use ZODB 3.9 with Zope
2.11?
Aside from any ch
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I would like to get that fix in for Zope 2.11, which will use ZODB 3.8.
Are there any objections to changing this there as well? This is a bit
of a grey area between a bugfix and completin
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I would like to get that fix in for Zope 2.11, which will use ZODB
3.8. Are there any objections to changing this there as well? This is
a bit of a grey area between a bugfix and completing an unfinished
feature, and I'm do
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could we move
those major changes into ZODB 3.10 and create ZODB 3.9 with only modest
feature enhancements, then use ZODB 3.9 with Zope 2.
On Apr 23, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could
we move
those major changes into ZODB 3.10 and create ZODB 3.9 with only
mo
--On 23. April 2008 09:39:57 -0600 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could we move
those major changes into ZODB 3.10 and cr
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could
we move
those major changes into ZODB 3.10 and create ZODB 3
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.11b1 was released in December 2007 :-)
Somebody forgot to upload it to zope.org, then. I see only the alpha 1
release:
http://www.zope.org/Products/
I'll assume you're correct about the beta being released, so never mind
on the ZODB 3.9 idea.
Shane
___
--On 23. April 2008 09:39:57 -0600 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could we move
those major changes into ZODB 3.10 and cr
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:39:57 -0600 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could we move
those major changes in
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Apr 23, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 23. April 2008 09:20:00 -0600 Shane Hathaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
AFAIK, Jim is working on major ZODB changes for ZODB 3.9. Could
we move
those major changes into ZODB
18 matches
Mail list logo
