On 9/18/13 4:41 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I've been working on CSRF protection for zope.formlib.
Anyone else interested in this feature?
We made an internal release of zope.formlib with this functionality and
so far we found no issues in using it in production.
After updating
Hi,
I've been working on CSRF protection for zope.formlib.
I have a csrfprotection branch in my zope.formlib fork on github. The
changes against the current zope.formlib mainline can be found here:
https://github.com/janwijbrand/zope.formlib/compare/csrfprotection
When creating form
On 9/18/13 5:26 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
+1 for implementing convenient CSRF.
I wonder if you could make your implementation more orthogonal by
implementing a CSRF field/widget, and make your `protected` attribute
simply trigger the inclusion of this field implicitly.
This way you
Hi,
I wonder if there is a formal or informal write-up of how to nicely
contribute code to the repositories under the zopefoundation umbrella.
Back in the subversion days I would branch a project, amend code, write
tests, commit this to the repository, ask for feedback on the list, and,
On 9/17/13 12:04 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
snip
2) fork the repository, make a branch in the fork, do my work, push the
changes to my fork, and issue a pull request.
The latter is what I did, without explicitly asking for feedback.
Luckily someone did give me feedback (thanks!) :-)
Now
On 9/17/13 1:00 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0200, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I wonder if there is a formal or informal write-up of how to
nicely contribute code to the repositories under the
zopefoundation umbrella.
I don't think so. I'd like to see one
On 9/17/13 1:47 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
I strongly prefer that the reviewer do the merge.
I'd also really like reviewers to take their responsibility
seriously, making comments and suggestions where appropriate.
Software review, done well, improves the software, and, more
importantly, improves
On 9/17/13 3:32 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
Is this reviewer role something someone takes upon himself? I mean, if I
see a pull request for a code base that I know, I could review the request?
These are good questions. I probably don't have
Hi,
Stephan, may I kindly request a few more package migrations to github?
Here's the list:
groktoolkit
grokcore.errorview
grokcore.permission
grokcore.registries
grokcore.resource
grokui.admin
hurry.query
hurry.workflow
z3c.bcrypt
zc.relation
zc.relationship
zopetoolkit
Thank you *very much*
On 3/22/13 12:59 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday, March 22, 2013 10:23:21 AM Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
zopetoolkit
Is everyone ok with me moving this? Hanno mentioned that several external
tools depend on the SVN location and the move was delayed because of that. I
think this package
On 3/1/13 5:29 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday, March 01, 2013 02:37:34 PM Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
megrok.menu
It's done now, but it lost its 0.1 tag due to a conversion issue.
Great! And thanks again!
regards, jw
___
Zope-Dev
Hi,
Disclaimer: it's been a while since I actively followed zope-dev and
grok-dev. So, please forgive me my ignorance.
Spurred by the recent ZTK-2.0 discussion, I'm trying to get back on
track on the topics of 1) migrating package to github and 2) porting
packages to Python 3.
As a first
On 3/1/13 10:17 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
Disclaimer: it's been a while since I actively followed zope-dev and
grok-dev. So, please forgive me my ignorance.
A single up-to-date web page sure beats reading months of list
On 3/1/13 2:23 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 11:24:31AM +0100, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
On 3/1/13 10:17 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
My attempt at this: https://gist.github.com/mgedmin/4944724
AFAIK Stephan migrated most of the zope.* packages using this process
On 3/1/13 1:39 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
AFAIK Stephan migrated most of the zope.* packages using this process.
Yes, I have, except that I use a one does it all script published here:
https://github.com/zopefoundation/zope.githubsupport
Aha, great!
All you need to do is to create a
On 3/1/13 2:49 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday, March 01, 2013 02:37:34 PM Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I do see someone just created an empty grokcore.component repository on
github (thanks whoever did that! :-) )
It is actually fully converted. :-)
LOL - cool!
I am going to adjust
Hi,
On 2/26/13 5:04 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
The process for a ZTK 2.0 release isn't really well defined. I'm not
sure if Jan-Wijbrand and Christophe are still interested in working on
ZTK releases.
I'm personally and from a business-perspective still interested in the
ZTK and to
Hi,
On 2/26/13 7:26 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
snip
Our rule for inclusion in the ZTK is: Whatever library is used by at
least two out of the three frameworks (BlueBream, Grok, Zope).
Given that BlueBream hasn't seen any release beyond a 1.0 about two
years back, I'm not sure it's active
On 9/16/12 07:28 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:44:30PM +0200, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
The reason I came across this issue is trying to improve the test
coverage of the application I'm building somewhat closer to 100% and
found that the form actions implementation
On 9/16/12 09:38 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On Sep 16, 2012, at 07:28, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 01:44:30PM +0200, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
After years and years of heavily using zope.formlib it suddenly struck
me that the zope.formlib.form.action
Hi,
After years and years of heavily using zope.formlib it suddenly struck
me that the zope.formlib.form.action decorator returns an Action()
object instead of the decorated function (this action object is also
added to the form's actions sequence as a side effect of the decorator).
I know
On 7/3/12 15:06 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
At the end of this post, I pasted the diff from the current zope.intid
trunk against your fork on bitbucket. Maybe this would make it easier
for others to comment
On 1/24/12 23:49 , Cykooz wrote:
2012/1/25 Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as:
http://foundation.zope.org/agreements is where you can find the
committer agreement form.
Thanks.
But I have one problem. I do not know any of the existing Committer
who can vouch for me.
Bringing up a rather
Hi,
I'd like to make a bugfix release for zope.error. Could someone grant me
the needed permissions on pypi for this? My pypi handle is jw.
Thank you in advance.
regards, jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Thanks.
Released as zope.error 3.7.3.
regards, jw
On 17/01/2012 21:33 , Jim Fulton wrote:
Done.
Jim
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to make a bugfix release for zope.error. Could someone grant me the
needed permissions on pypi
On 6/6/11 16:48 , Tres Seaver wrote:
On 06/05/2011 02:24 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
[1]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zope2.13-py2.7 slave-ubuntu64
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-June/042535.html
On 4/7/11 07:00 , Zope tests summarizer wrote:
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-04-05 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-04-06 00:00:00 UTC:
[5]FAILED Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.1-py2.5 slave-ubuntu64
On 4/4/11 12:57 , Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Apr 3 11:00:00 2011 UTC to Mon Apr 4 11:00:00 2011 UTC.
There were 186 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 23
from buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 8 from ccomb at free.fr,
On 3/30/11 9:11 AM, Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:22, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zopetoolkit-1.0_win-py2.6 slave-win
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Mon Mar 28 15:18:14
On 3/30/11 13:17 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12-py2.6 slave-ubuntu32
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Tue Mar 29 17:09:03 EDT 2011
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036550.html
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot /
Hi,
Not sure where to 'hook into' the discussion thread, so I'll just start
here:
On 3/20/11 15:28 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
Hm, it's been a while since I've looked at grok. Some notes:
- The mechanism I'm thinking of should not require *any* ZCML.
Do you mean without having a configure.zcml
On 3/20/11 16:12 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Both Grok and Pyramid (or martian and venusian really) do a scan of
the code to find the registration hints.
Pyramid only does so if you tell it to do so by using config.scan(). You
are not obliged to do that, and I have several pyramid projects
On 3/21/11 10:30 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
- you may have some draft files in your tree that are not ready
for use
and never referenced anywhere, but a scan will still process them.
This is true.
I ran into this with .html.py files generated by Chameleon as well. My
Zope startup
On 2/7/11 18:03 PM, Roger wrote:
why not use the same pattern like I changed to in z3c.authenticator.
There the camefrom request part was replaced by session handling.
On the other side, I think your changes are fine since, I guess
someone from gocept, a long time ago, fixed and protected the
Hi,
The SessionCredentialsPlugin will redirect to a login form whenever a
user needs to be authenticated. The URL to this login form will have a
camefrom query string, where the camefrom is the path-information to
the originally requested view.
When the credentials provided by the user are
On 2/7/11 12:04 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
I'm not sure whether you open up a security hole there.
Imagine that someone does a
http://yoursite.com/@@loginform.html?camefrom=http://mysite.com
We ended up with storing the camefrom URL in a session variable.
The redirect method in the zope
/index/1.1/zopeapp-versions.cfg
There's a bit of high level change overview available at
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/releases/overview-1.1.html
Kind regards,
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org
Hi,
The ZTK-releaseteam is making plans for a ZTK-1.1 release. We aim for a
release next week. Except for an updated versions list [1], other
significant changes will be:
* dropping python-2.4 support
* gaining python-2.7 support
* more deprecated zope.app.* packages [2]
We welcome questions,
On 11/26/10 8:37 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
currently the ZTK tests on the trunk do not run successfully in a
virtualenv.
sip
But reverting this change does not help to get the tests of
z3c.recipe.compattest itself running again. There are the same errors
like before.
Is it intensional that
On 11/26/10 10:49 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
On 11/26/10 8:37 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
currently the ZTK tests on the trunk do not run successfully in a
virtualenv.
sip
But reverting this change does not help to get the tests of
z3c.recipe.compattest itself running again
On 10/18/10 21:16 PM, Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 18.10.2010 um 11:02 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
I propose to release this as 1.5.0, which would be a major version
release that would indicate: Watch out, potentially backwards
incompatible changes ahead!.
Right?
+1 looks nice.
Done. Thanks
Hi Michael and Marius,
Thanks for the feedback and suggestions! This is what I did:
On 10/13/10 15:37 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 13.10.2010 um 13:50 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
Then there's no real need for a browser extra, as the browser
subpackage does not really have any code (only
On 10/13/10 18:56 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 13.10.2010 um 16:05 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
Hi,
A while ago zope.pluggable split off reusable components from
zope.app.authentication. The concrete IAuthenticatorPlugin
implementations (principalfolder and groupfolder) however, were left
On 10/6/10 08:08 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 05.10.2010 um 20:21 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
Today I fixed a small bug in zc.catalog (the ftesting.zcml depended
on a permission name that has been removed from zope.dublincore).
Actually the permission has been renamed (from zope.app.dublincore
On 10/13/10 13:16 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 13.10.2010 um 10:02 schrieb Jan-Wijbrand Kolman:
If I would be pedantic here I'd say there is no such thing as
renaming a permission. When the old name is gone, it is gone.
There's no mechanism similar to the BBB imports for the permission
ids
On 10/13/10 13:42 , Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
Good idea. This would improve the testing situation. That would
definitely help the Grok Toolkit, as it could then run the normal
tests in the context of the toolkit, without pulling in the dependencies
of the browser tests.
Ah, no it wouldn't
Hi,
A while ago zope.pluggable split off reusable components from
zope.app.authentication. The concrete IAuthenticatorPlugin
implementations (principalfolder and groupfolder) however, were left in
zope.app.authentication.
I think it makes sense to move these IAuthenticatorPlugin
with us on this mailing list.
Kind regards,
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
As it seems wiki.zope.org is down, as is download.zope.org. But probably
this is already known..? Is there anything I can do to help getting the
machine(s) back up?
regards, jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On 10/6/10 10:27 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
On 10/6/10 9:53 AM, yuppie wrote:
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to
release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make
On 10/7/10 10:20 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
* Jan-Wijbrand Kolmanjanwijbr...@gmail.com [2010-10-06 13:39]:
BTW, I discussed updating the z3c.recipe.i18n for similar reasons - to
support newer buildout features - in a separate thread. There people
seemed to be +1 on releasing a recipe that
On 10/6/10 9:53 AM, yuppie wrote:
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to
release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make it possible to move grok and
the groktoolkit over
On 10/6/10 12:49 PM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
* Jan-Jaap Driessenjdries...@thehealthagency.com [2010-10-05 18:09]:
Version 0.12.2 of z3c.recipe.compattest is not compatible with recent
versions of it's dependencies zc.buildout (v1.5.1), zc.recipe.egg
(v1.3.2) and z3c.recipe.scripts. I fixed
Hi,
This afternoon I merged the gary-0.8.0 branch for z3c.recipe.i18n. The
recipe now uses and depends on zc.buildout-1.5.1 features. I'd like to
release this merge as 0.8.0 as this make it possible to move grok and
the groktoolkit over to zc.buildout-1.5.1. I guess this is also useful
in the
Hi,
Today I fixed a small bug in zc.catalog (the ftesting.zcml depended on a
permission name that has been removed from zope.dublincore). This made
me realize that zc.catalog contains ZMI code in the browser subpackage.
Are people still using this ZMI code from zc.catalog? Would it be an
idea
discussing with us on this mailing list.
Kind regards,
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org
Hi,
Grok would be greatly helped with a 1.4.4 bugfix release of zc.catalog.
The fix we want is already implemented, we just need a release.
Is someone willing to do that? (or, would allow me to do it by granting
pypi right for the package? My pypi username is jw).
kind regards, jw
On 6/30/10 21:47 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
To use the ZTK release, you can use:
[buildout]
extends =
http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/1.0a1/ztk-versions.cfg
http://download.zope.org/zopetoolkit/index/1.0a1/zopeapp-versions.cfg
This first release focuses on getting
On 6/3/10 8:20 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I just fixed up z3c.ajax and it has a quirk that the check doesn't know
about:
If a file doesn't contain any copyright attribution header, it ignores
that file.
In this case, z3c.ajax has no headers at all. no setup.py. no buildout.
I added
On 6/3/10 8:40 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
On 06/02/2010 05:19 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
On 6/2/10 15:11 , Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the ZF needs to finish updating the copyright attributions to state that
the Zope
On 6/2/10 15:11 , Christian Theune wrote:
So, I'm the first one to step up to do a hundred of them until Friday
2010-06-11. Who else is joining me?
I'll take a batch of ten per day until 2010-06-11.
Can I just pick from the list, or will you (or someone) hand out a batch?
regards, jw
On 6/2/10 15:11 , Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the ZF needs to finish updating the copyright attributions to state that
the Zope code now belongs to the foundation.
I've prepared some scripts to help with monitoring which packages need
to be updated and also a helper to update most cases.
Hi,
What should I do with a package such as lovely.memcached where the
copyright is currently attributed to Lovely Systems and Contributors?
Just apply the fix script?
regards, jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Hi,
Another one I'm not sure about:
jquery.javascript
The zope.repositorypolicy readme instructs me to remove the files that
are copyright to a non-committer. So in this case I should remove the
whole 'js' directory from the package I guess?
regards, jw
On 5/27/10 8:12 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Could someone please grant me (username jw) access to zope.password as
well? Thanks in advance!
According to PyPI jw has Owner privileges already (by now).
Uli granted me access, but his reply to me about it didn't make it to
the list somehow.
Hello,
Could someone grant me pypi access to zope.app.authentication and
zope.password?
My pypi username is jw.
For compatibility reasons the upcoming Grok-1.0.x bugfix release cannot
jump to a newer zope.app.authentication version, but I'd still like to
add support for the SSHA password
On 5/26/10 08:46 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
Could someone grant me pypi access to zope.app.authentication and
zope.password?
Done.
Thanks.
However, I see myself in the list of package owners for
zope.app.authentication now
Hi,
When I define a principal in my site.zcml and have it use the
SSHAPasswordManager, I cannot login as a TypeError: character mapping
must return integer, None or unicode is raised in the checkPassword()
methid. It took me quite a while to figure out what was going on...
The site.zcml
Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
On 03/29/2010 04:08 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi everyone,
on the way towards a ZTK 1.0 release we first looked for a single
volunteer release manager who would drive the process.
As no one stepped up and no (serious) nominations were presented
Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks good.
The only weird is to define those constants in the method parameters.
def _isIrrelevantRequest(self, RELEVANTlse, IRRELEVANT ue):
Do you call this method from somewhere else?
Maybe it would be better to change the name (and behavour)
Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
JWK I'll make a release of z3c.password then too, if you agree with that.
Sure. I'd go with a minor version increment. E.g. 0.10.1.
We were at 0.9.0, I made it a 0.10.0.
Great for having these features available!!
regards, jw
Hi,
A while ago I asked some questions and made some suggestions for improving how
to track failed login attempts in z3c.password. Most likely these suggestions
got buried in now a out-of-sight thread and were never noticed.
My suggestion was that making a request for for example a resource
Hello,
I would be greatly helped with a new release of z3c.password with the
Dutch translations that I recently added.
Would it be possible for one of the package owners to make a release,
or, alternatively, allow me to upload a new version to the package
index? (My pypi username is jw).
Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
Would it be possible for one of the package owners to make a release,
or, alternatively, allow me to upload a new version to the package
index? (My pypi username is jw).
Done.
Thanks!
I just released z3c.password 0.9.0.
regards, jw
Hi Adam,
Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
We're using it too...
Go for 0.8.0.
I noticed that requesting for, for example, a resource could still trigger
account locked errors, where in my opinion only the login attempts
themselves should do that.
I created a branch...
Hi,
I'd like to make a 3.6.1 bugfix release for zope.app.wsgi.
On the trunk there's support for picking up product configuration
that has not been released yet (however, it had been released in a
bugfix release in the 3.4 line).
Could I ask someone to grant me pypi rights for this package?
Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:48:41AM +, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I'd like to make a 3.6.1 bugfix release for zope.app.wsgi.
On the trunk there's support
Hi Adam,
Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Adam GROSZER wrote:
Thinking this further, resource requests will have a '/@@/' (usually)
in their URL. So it might be an idea to skip those requests from
counting.
Seems to me skipping anything except
Hi,
Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
On 01/26/2010 09:32 AM, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
I hear you and understand you.
Thanks. :)
I'm not advertizing for an immediate and brainless action.
What I did this week end is simply to split the PAU from all the
components provided with it
Hi,
Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
On 01/26/2010 03:30 PM, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
Well, the first step is already to cut the dependencies and get a sane
tree and a reusable package.
The second step, however, if people feel like it, will be to refactor
a bit and _that_ will need
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hi there,
This is to announce my withdrawal from the Zope Toolkit steering
group.
I'm not sure if you're reading this, but I wanted to thank you anyway
for the tremendous amount of energy you've put into the steering
group.
kind regards,
jw
Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your reply!
Right. Well right now the lame solution is to try to count the number
of resources needed to load the page and multiply maxFailedAttempts by
that number.
Other than that you _will_ want to offload resources in production.
Oh,
Hi,
I'm looking into integrating z3c.password into an application that
also uses the PAU with the principal folder, InternalPrincipals and
the SessionCredentialsPlugin.
One of the features of z3c.password that I'd like to use is locking
out an user account after a number of failed login
Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
Betreff: [Zope-dev] z3c.password and failedAttempts
andSessionCredentialsPlugin
I'm looking into integrating z3c.password into an application
that also uses the PAU with the principal folder,
InternalPrincipals and the SessionCredentialsPlugin.
One of
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
25 zope.app packages are broken due to changes in zope.publisher 3.12.
zope.publisher had some components factored out of it into zope.login.
I fixed zope.app.exception: it could be fixed
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
25 zope.app packages are broken due to changes in zope.publisher 3.12.
zope.publisher had some components factored out of it into zope.login.
I fixed zope.app.exception: it could be fixed by adding the zope.login
requirement and adding a zcml
hello,
Would any of the pypi owners of zope.app.exception be so kind to
upload the 3.6.0 release to the package index? I see this package has
been tagged already a while ago.
I think this newer version should also be included in the ZTK versions
list, as this version will import the correct
Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Would any of the pypi owners of zope.app.exception be so kind to
upload the 3.6.0 release to the package index? I see this package has
been tagged already a while ago.
I think
hello,
Would any of the owners of zope.app.pagetemplate be so kind to upload
(or let me upload) a new version of zope.app.pagetemplate?
This will allow me to fix and release zope.app.exception.
regards,
jw
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
$ ./bin/test
/opt/baiju/wa/z3hello/eggs/zope.testing-3.8.6-py2.6.egg/zope/testing/
testrunner/debug.py:23:
DeprecationWarning: zope.testing.doctest is deprecated in favour of
the Python standard library
Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
janwijbr...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
Would any of the owners of zope.app.pagetemplate be so kind to upload
(or let me upload) a new version of zope.app.pagetemplate?
Added jw as owner.
Thank you
Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what has changed that could be related to this, but
if
anyone has a hint for me...
I can definitely reproduce the error.
It seems to be occurring somewhere in the setup of the test layer
Hi,
I'm about to work a bit on z3c.schema2json [1]. As has been briefly
discussed before (a while ago [2]), z3c. schema2json is so similar to
z3c.schema2xml [3] in what it does and how it does it, that I wonder
about merging the two packages somehow.
One way to do this - maybe - is to use
The Grok_ development team is very happy to release Grok 1.0. Grok 1.0
is the culmination of 3 years of work after the start of the Grok
project in late 2006. It presents a stable platform for developing
powerful, extensible web applications. Grok is the result of years of
work by the large Grok
Hi,
We're trying to make an integration of z3c.hashedresource into Grok.
While working on it we wondered how and where people using
z3c.hashedresource set the caching headers for the resources referenced
by the URLs generated by z3c.hashedresource.
A few random thoughts about this:
*
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 18 September 2009, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
While working on it we wondered how and where people using
z3c.hashedresource set the caching headers for the resources referenced
by the URLs generated by z3c.hashedresource.
I think I solved
that applications that directly or indirectly
trigger sending mails do not actually send during testing?
2) am I on the right track thinking a set up equivalent of
zope.testing.cleanup could be useful for these cases?
kind regards,
jw
--
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello,
I'd rather use a mailer stub for testing.
Like the one in zope.sendmail.tests.test_mailer.py
...
class SMTP(object):
...
Something like this can be setup for individual tests with
utility
name=mailer-name
Chris Withers wrote:
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
Zope.sendmail explains in its README.txt that the developer using
zope.sendmail should himself take care of not sending emails (by setting
up a test layer for example, that would register a no-op IMailDelivery
utility).
Why not just use
--
Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
