Log message for revision 39575:
Created branch to change the way Zope 3 is integrated at the zope package
level
Changed:
A Zope/branches/jim-reintegrate-zope3/
-=-
Copied: Zope/branches/jim-reintegrate-zope3 (from rev 39574, Zope/trunk)
___
Log message for revision 39578:
Removed the zope external.
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/jim-reintegrate-zope3/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/jim-reintegrate-zope3/lib/python
___
Name: svn:externals
-
Log message for revision 39583:
Move to ZODB 3.6.0b1.
ZopeDatabase.createDB(): Plug database_name into config rather than
passing it to ZODBDatabase.open(). More should be done to detect
conflicting zodb_db section name and database_name, but I'm not
sure where all the relevant code
Log message for revision 39585:
Added externals to the zope subpackages.
Changed:
_U Zope/branches/jim-reintegrate-zope3/lib/python/zope/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/branches/jim-reintegrate-zope3/lib/python/zope
___
Log message for revision 39599:
Change to link to top-level Zope 3 top-level packages one-by-one.
I have to do this in multiple steps because svn:externals is half
baked. :(
Changed:
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/
-=-
Property changes on: Zope/trunk/lib/python
Log message for revision 39600:
Change to link to top-level Zope 3 top-level packages one-by-one.
Changed:
A Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope/
_U Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope/__init__.py
-=-
Copied: Zope/trunk/lib/python/zope (from rev 39585,
Tres Seaver wrote:
The default usecase for running tests should be a developer making
changes and running tests. In this case, silent mode is unhelpful;
it gives no feedback until the very end of the run, which takes a
**long** time for the whole Zope2 tree. The dots provided at
verbosity
I really really wouldn't want to see added on top of the current Zope2
publisher.
The Zope 2 publisher (and the various traversal mechanisms -- publisher,
restrictedTraverse, TALES) should first be refactored to use Zope 3
mechanisms, and only after that is done should we consider adding the
[Chris McDonough]
There is a wrinkle about performing this merge that eluded my memory
until now.
To support multidatabases within Zope, it was reasonable to change
ZODB.config.ZODBDatabase to support the heretofore
likely-unused-by-real-world-code databases and database_name options
that
Chris, FYI, I stitched ZODB 3.6.0b1 into zodb-blobs-branch, and
changed ZopeDatabase.createDB() to plug database_name into config
instead of passing it to ZODBDatabase.open(). The checkin msg
summarizes test results; since I haven't work on this branch before,
I'm not sure what was expected here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Peters wrote:
Log message for revision 39583:
Move to ZODB 3.6.0b1.
ZopeDatabase.createDB(): Plug database_name into config rather than
passing it to ZODBDatabase.open(). More should be done to detect
conflicting zodb_db section
[Tim Peters]
Log message for revision 39583:
Move to ZODB 3.6.0b1.
ZopeDatabase.createDB(): Plug database_name into config rather than
passing it to ZODBDatabase.open(). More should be done to detect
conflicting zodb_db section name and database_name, but I'm not
sure where all
Thanks for this!
Looks like that test failure is incidental and not symptomatic of
changes made to ZODB. I think Tres may have said that it can be
fixed by merging in a fix from the Five HEAD, but I don't know this
for fact first-hand.
It's encouraging that most of the tests pass but
Jim Fulton wrote:
I was about to start working on integrating the new test runner
and was reminded that we need to integrate Zope differently than we did
for 2.8/3.0. Then, we took advantage of the fact that packages not
included
in the Zope X3 3.0 release were trimmed from the corresponding
[Chris McDonough]
Thanks for this!
Not required, so long as I get to thank you for finishing it ;-)
Looks like that test failure is incidental and not symptomatic of
changes made to ZODB. I think Tres may have said that it can be
fixed by merging in a fix from the Five HEAD, but I don't
Chris Withers wrote:
Have a look at the ZSQL methods code, I remember this being pretty old
and convoluted :-(
Ok, thanks! I take a look.
Well, i am running zope under root privileges in read-only mode.
What does this mean?
I am opening the ZODB in read-only, using the appropriate
Chris Withers wrote:
Vangelis Mihalopoulos wrote:
[zope - ] (which btw i believe to be very secure)
The why do you consider it a risk?
I don't really. But when i present my security assessment report saying
Zope has never had a compomising security issue. i'll get the
(expected) answer
...
i don't want him to be able to directly access (read/write) the
database i am using. *AFAIK*, ZSQLMethods won't do for this.
Then put constraints in on your database, or make the whole connection
read-only.
I want to have full access rights on the database through the external
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 21. Oktober 2005 12:18:31 -0400 Robert Boyd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been tasked with rapidly developing a demo for a proposed workflow
application using Zope. I have plenty of CMF experience including
Hi my friends :)
I've noticed the following situation.
When I send internet form onto PythonScript the
variables in the REQUEST.formare in the different order that they were
asfieldsin theinternet form.
I see when I send internet form by GET method that
variables are placed in the right
On 24 Oct 2005, at 13:54, Krzysztof Kubacki wrote:
Hi my friends :)
I've noticed the following situation.
When I send internet form onto PythonScript the variables in the
REQUEST.form are in the different order that they were as fields in
the internet form.
I see when I send internet form
On 24 Oct 2005, at 14:03, Krzysztof Kubacki wrote:
How to change it?
I would like to have variables in the same order as I put them into
internet form.
You can't. REQUEST.form is a dictionary. They are, by definition,
unordered.
Why do you need them ordered? What is the use
--On 24. Oktober 2005 15:19:45 +0200 Krzysztof Kubacki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the thing is that I don't have guarantee that user will not replace
fields in the internet form(there is a possibility).
AFAIK there is no specification that requires form parameters to be
submitted in
Krzysztof Kubacki schrieb:
On 24 Oct 2005, at 14:03, Krzysztof Kubacki wrote:
How to change it?
I would like to have variables in the same order as I put them into
internet form.
You can't. REQUEST.form is a dictionary. They are, by definition,
unordered.
Why do you need them ordered? What
Tino Wildenhain wrote:
I want to have full access rights on the database through the
external methods.
Usually you dont want that.
Yes, usually i don't.
Sane security constrains on database save you a lot mistakes if done
right. You can also use views and stored
functions to further
Thanks for the info, that is some good advice. I am currently deciding which platform to migrate to (Linux or OpenBSD). Apple has let me down and I want to get off it as soon as possible. When you find *BSD specific bugs, how long does it take for them to be fixed? Given that most developers
On 10/24/05, Gary Kahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will take a good look at ubuntu before deciding. I am also considering
KRUDserver.
http://www.tummy.com/Products/krudserver/
Many of us at Zope Corp develop on Ubuntu and MacOSX. I think all of
our commercial hosting runs on Centos, so
Sorry and thanks.
I've found that the when I initially create a separate mount point and
Data.fs file with
mountpoint /original
and then copy Data.fs to
../newlocation
this almost works:
mountpoint /newlocation:/original
It works, in that I can navigate through the ZMI, but it fails in
Ok, that's a bit much for my question I guess...
I gather from all your mails that I can not close a database
connection periodically or on event from Zope (Script or whatever)?
Any hands-down clues what I can do to prevent db-conns from ideling
around?
/Carsten
-Original Message-
From:
I didn't do anything with PDO either.
I just:
* Put files from the full Oracle install some header files into
the directory rdbms/public and network (neither of which are created by
the version of the Instant Client that I installed). I found the
instructions most helpful
30 matches
Mail list logo
