Hi Tres
Whoever released those two eggs (the '.dev-r#' ones) need
to release real updated packages, and then grok 0.11.1
should be released using them.
DEATH TO FAUX PACKAGES!
As far as I understand, this does not happen if you
depend on a KGS, right?
Does the grok release not use
Hi,
every day Hivurt is closer to alfa release, we are doing a lot of job to
cleanup source code and adding new functionality. To inform people
around I has open blog http://hivurt.wordpress.com/. This is place where
we will publish news, screenshots, tips, answers about university and
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Thu Nov 8 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Fri Nov 9 13:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:52:18 EST 2007
Hi Guys,
Can you remember why you added the following line to ZopePageTemplate.py?
content_type = 'text/html'
It seems to arbitarily lock new page templates (or subclasses of them)
into text/html mode.
MailTemplates subclass ZopePageTemplate and expect to be text/plain by
default...
On Friday 09 November 2007, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Tres
Whoever released those two eggs (the '.dev-r#' ones) need
to release real updated packages, and then grok 0.11.1
should be released using them.
DEATH TO FAUX PACKAGES!
As far as I understand, this does not happen if you
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2007, Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Tres
Whoever released those two eggs (the '.dev-r#' ones) need
to release real updated packages, and then grok 0.11.1
should be released using them.
DEATH TO FAUX PACKAGES!
As far as I understand, this does not
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
It can't because you guys broke a dozen packages when you split up some
of the zope.app.* packages. I'm going to fix this now.
Can we stop pointing fingers, please? I just spent 3-4 man-weeks to get the
packages to a decent state,
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Modified: zope.app.securitypolicy/trunk/setup.py
===
--- zope.app.securitypolicy/trunk/setup.py 2007-11-09 13:08:59 UTC
(rev 81634) +++
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Revert the splitup of zope.app.securitypolicy in the stable 3.4.x line
(it will be confined to the trunk/3.5.x line). We're doing this by creating
the 3.4.x branch based on the last working release, 3.4.0.
Please do not do
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
It can't because you guys broke a dozen packages when you split up some
of the zope.app.* packages. I'm going to fix this now.
Can we stop pointing fingers, please?
Sorry for not sugar coating the facts. I
On Nov 9, 2007 4:06 PM, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create our own locked down index?
I think so because,
Surely there must be a way to say I want to use THAT KGS over there.
Except for this module, that should hav this version. And of course,
all these bunch of eggs which isn't
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Modified: zope.app.securitypolicy/trunk/setup.py
===
--- zope.app.securitypolicy/trunk/setup.py 2007-11-09 13:08:59 UTC
(rev 81634) +++
On Friday 09 November 2007, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 4:06 PM, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create our own locked down index?
I think so because,
Surely there must be a way to say I want to use THAT KGS over there.
Except for this module, that should hav this
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 4:06 PM, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create our own locked down index?
I think so because,
Surely there must be a way to say I want to use THAT KGS over there.
Except for this module, that should hav this version. And of course,
all these
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Before KGS there was no concept for keep the eggs in sync. Each project
has to do it by itself. KGS at least is something that helps to manage
the zope eggs. Everything outside this has to be done by the release
manager of the project.
And before the KGS, the cheesshop
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Those are exactly the problems with the locked down index:
* You can always use *more* packages but you'll have to lock them down
yourself, can't use another KGS for those
But this is a limitation of setuptools. I think this could
On Nov 9, 2007 4:34 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those are exactly the problems with the locked down index:
* You can always use *more* packages but you'll have to lock them down
yourself, can't use another KGS for those
Could we create a grok KGS which is generated
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
I think we're now quite aware of that problem. Hence we need the KGS.
But I'm questioning the implementation using a locked down index.
What's the alternative? Nailing versions is not it for me, which by the way
you can do with
On Nov 9, 2007 4:06 PM, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
-Version 3.4.0 (2007/9/25)
--
+- Reverted the premature split away of core components to
+ zope.securitypolicy. Switch to
On Friday 09 November 2007, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 4:34 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those are exactly the problems with the locked down index:
* You can always use *more* packages but you'll have to lock them down
yourself, can't use another KGS
On 9 Nov 2007, at 16:51 , Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 4:06 PM, Stephan Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2007, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
-Version 3.4.0 (2007/9/25)
--
+- Reverted the premature split away of core components to
+
On 9 Nov 2007, at 17:11 , Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 5:02 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but other packages in the current KGS have already been
converted to use zope.securitypolicy, so reverting the split-up would
cause more trouble than I thought it
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/PackagesShouldLoadConfigurationTheyDependUpon
Comments appreciated. Otherwise, silence is treated as assent.
I'm planning on starting with this tomorrow as part of the Boring Sprint
we're having in Tübingen right now.
___
We should probably try to fix easy_install so that it can use layered
indexes (like apt and yum do).
- C
On Nov 9, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 5:02 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, but other packages in the current KGS have already
On Friday 09 November 2007, Chris McDonough wrote:
We should probably try to fix easy_install so that it can use layered
indexes (like apt and yum do).
Yep, that would be ideal.
Regards,
Stephan
--
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web
Hi Philipp
Betreff: [Zope-dev] RFC: Packages should load configuration
they depend upon
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/PackagesShouldLoadConfigurationThey
DependUpon
Comments appreciated. Otherwise, silence is treated as assent.
I'm planning on starting with this tomorrow as part of the
On 9 Nov 2007, at 20:15 , Roger Ineichen wrote:
Betreff: [Zope-dev] RFC: Packages should load configuration
they depend upon
http://wiki.zope.org/zope3/PackagesShouldLoadConfigurationThey
DependUpon
Comments appreciated. Otherwise, silence is treated as assent.
I'm planning on starting with
Mikhail Kashkin wrote:
Hi,
every new day Hivurt is closer to alfa release, we are doing a lot of job to
cleanup source code and adding new functionality. To inform people
around I has open blog http://hivurt.wordpress.com/. This is place where
we will publish news, screenshots, tips, answers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Hi Guys,
Can you remember why you added the following line to ZopePageTemplate.py?
content_type = 'text/html'
It seems to arbitarily lock new page templates (or subclasses of them)
into text/html mode.
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 09 November 2007, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 4:06 PM, Roger Ineichen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Create our own locked down index?
I think so because,
Surely there must be a way to say I want to use THAT KGS over there.
Except for this module, that
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Tres
Whoever released those two eggs (the '.dev-r#' ones) need
to release real updated packages, and then grok 0.11.1
should be released using them.
DEATH TO FAUX PACKAGES!
As far as I understand, this does not happen if you
depend on a KGS, right?
Does the
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
So you're telling me that in order to define my own KGS (which anybody
should do for a serious project), I'll have to start deploying my own
index. For each project?
I think Grok should be using KGS by simply taking snapshots of it
sometimes and then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Roger Ineichen wrote:
Hi Tres
Whoever released those two eggs (the '.dev-r#' ones) need
to release real updated packages, and then grok 0.11.1
should be released using them.
DEATH TO FAUX PACKAGES!
As far as I
FYI, the old PAS collector has been moved to Launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-pas/
I have set up a team named zope-pas to receive bug requests etc,
however, I need everyone who still wants to be a collector supporter
to look at the team roster and let me know their Launchpad ID if
Hi
I am currently having problems sorting out utf8 encoding through the following chain of events, and I would GREATLY
appreciate any help anyone can offer. I need to do the following, in a Zope 2.9.2-, python 2.4.3 setup (I have also
tried this on Zope 2.10.4 with the uniocode patch for
- Original Message -
From: adam molyneaux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Read and parse a file encoded as utf8 - currently done with an external
script
2. send it to a page to edit as utf8
3. save it from the page into a mysql database as utf8
This is slightly complicated by the fact that steps
Hi,
For security reasons, i need to disable access on class method with HTTP
GET requests on my zope.
For example, i can accept things like
http://examplesite.com/object/aPythonScript
but not
http://examplesite.com/object/aClassMethod
Is it possible ?
Thanks for any help
Nicolas
37 matches
Mail list logo
