On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Christopher Lozinski
lozin...@freerecruiting.com wrote:
I would think that the world has to move to massive class libraries of
reusable software components, maybe not on the client side, because it
takes time to download, but certainly on the server side. Not
Wops. I have no idea why this thread popped up in my inbox today. Sorry.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Christopher Lozinski
lozin...@freerecruiting.com wrote:
I would think that the world has to move to massive
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I have a buildout where I am using the 'pyamp' module.
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyamp
zc.buildout on my Raspberry PI tries to download and install
the binary
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Christopher Lozinski
lozin...@freerecruiting.com wrote:
ZCA is very interesting stuff.
I got a call today from a client who wants to do an extensible
application in Javacript.
I instantly thought, we could do ZCA in Javascript. And while not many
people
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Albertas Agejevas a...@pov.lt wrote:
Subject: Success at porting ZTK app to Python 3!
Awesome!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML
I'm not major a CMF contributor and are unlikely to actually
contribute much in the future, so I do not and should not have a say
in the move.
I'd just want to correct a factually incorrect statement though:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Monopolies are
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Assuming an unsorted list of news stories, how would you use sorted to
get them ordered by category (ascending) + publication date (descending)?
This is the easiest, most obvious way:
sorted(sorted(news_stories,
I'm sorry, it's early in the morning. It is of course:
sorted(sorted(news_stories, key=lambda x: x.publication_date,
reverse=True), key=lambda x: x.category)
I forgot the key= bit.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Suresh V. suresh...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Friday 01 March 2013 02:15 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I'm sorry, it's early in the morning. It is of course:
sorted(sorted(news_stories, key=lambda x: x.publication_date,
reverse=True), key=lambda x
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On Feb 28, 2013, at 14:43 , Stephan Richter stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like to deprecate zope.sequencesort in ZTK 2.0, since it cannot
properly ported to Python 3, since it depends heavily
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2013 10:41 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Reading through the code, it seems to use a lot of code to provide
quite basic sorting functionality. It feels like it's
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Stephan Richter
stephan.rich...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
We are about 5-6 packages away from porting ZTK to Python 3
That's awesome!
//Lennart
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
- Running 2to3 on your sources is a good way to identify places that
need changing, but you'll have to revert most of the actual changes to
keep it compatible with Python 2.
I've find the easiest way to keep
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:25 AM, murat bilal murat.bi...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anybody help how to execute javascript code on DTML method like
It's a bit unclear what you are trying to do. But you can not call
DTML methods from Javascript, if that's what you want.
//Lennart
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:41:59PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I wanted to have an up-to-date status page for the status of the Python
3 porting
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
I wanted to have an up-to-date status page for the status of the Python
3 porting efforts of various zope-ish packages, so I made one:
http://zope3.pov.lt/py3/
Awesome. But do we have to call it Zope3? :-)
//Lennart
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 22:10 +0100, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Le 15/12/12 01:52, Tres Seaver a écrit :
I fixed the remainig issues in persistent and released 4.0.5 today: its
tests properly exercise the C extensions
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/06/2012 01:37 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Tres Seaver
tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
And if we don't want to support more than one site
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 05.09.2012, 11:48 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de:
I use a single Zope instance for several small CMF sites and I use .zexp
export and import for moving CMF sites from one Zope instance to an
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
No, one site per Data.fs is what we should support. This has more or less
been the explicit aim of Zope 2.8
So you want to tell everyone that either has not received that
message, or used Plone since before
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
And if we don't want to support more than one site the ZODB, there
should be a warning of you try to do it, btw.
I've got no problem with more than one CMF site in a single Zope
instance; I just don't want to promote
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Vincent Pelletier vinc...@nexedi.com wrote:
Hi,
We've just tagged the 1.0 NEO release.
NEO aims at being a replacement for use-cases where ZEO is used, but
with better scalability (by allowing data of a single database to be
distributed over several
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
The Plone Foundation adopted a policy for this, see
http://plone.org/foundation/materials/foundation-resolutions/patch-policy-052011
As we don't have any terms of service stating so for any of our issue
trackers, we
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Maintaining the chain of custody doesn't just consist of selecting pull
requests or patches coming from somewhere. It also means verifying the
contributor - be it the one who is creating the patch or pull request or the
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
Github: I don't know. I took the liberty of adding you to one of my
repos as collaborator, but I didn't find any way to change your
privileges so that you also could add collaborators, so someone else
have to answer
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, j...@nexedi.com wrote:
This approach protects from:
- legal risks posed by github
Such as?
- instabilities due to ever changing fashion in code hosting (sourceforce
then google code then bitbucket then github then etc.)
Sure. At the cost of a lot of extra
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, j...@nexedi.com wrote:
This approach protects from:
- legal risks posed by github
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
https://github.com/popular/starred
i doubt that github i willing to get into the doghouse by doing really
nasty things - and thus getting into risk of loosing projects.
This is pure speculation, or are
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Aug 18, 2012, at 21:46 , Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, but my question is why this changes with github.
GitHub is a third party infrastructure run by other people. I cannot
ascertain how well
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Aug 19, 2012, at 10:17 , Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
And since it becomes ever easier to accept code from unknown sources (e.g.
pull requests) legal code ownership becomes an issue again
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Speaking for myself as ZF representative, it is my duty to make sure that
chain of custody for the code is upheld and safeguarded. Convenience, which I
feel is driving the move towards GitHub, is nice to have. But I
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
The point is that the identity of the committer on Github is not tied to
the ZF's machinery for contributions, which means that it cannot be used
to preserve the chain of custody under the contributor agreement.
What
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as
official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub.
Reason: the ZF can no longer ascertain that only official ZF
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Because the ability to check into svn.zope.org is based on a chain of
custody managed by the ZF (web account, verified e-mail address, and SSH
key). J. Random Hacker's account on Github has no such chain.
Sure, but
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Giampiero Benvenuti
giampiero.benven...@chiaroscuro.com wrote:
P.S. I know i can assign multiple attributes to an index in the catalog,
still I wonder why the above code doesn't work.
I don't know, but first I'd like to know why you are doing this? The
objects in
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Giampiero Benvenuti
giampiero.benven...@chiaroscuro.com wrote:
Hi,
I just would like to index a string property of the Folder object in a proper
searchebale DateTime format.
Right now I have just a string property like 12:30:30 and I would like to
index it
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Alan Runyan runy...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to release a '4.0.0' version of the package, and switch
the ZODB trunk to pull it in as a dependency (deleting the currently
included (older) copy of persistent). One possible issue is that I
have not (yet) made
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I will release a 4.0.1 silencing the warnings unless somebody speaks up
in their favor.
We should make sure we have 2to3 fixers for everything change as well.
I added some fixers, but it's so long ago I'm not sure all
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Thomas Massmann
thomas.massm...@inqbus.de wrote:
I added the plural form support
Whohoo!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding!
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:37, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
How deep is the six dependency? For every package I've ported to date,
it has ended up being more sensible to implement a local '_compat' module
which had only the needed straddles (sometimes inspired by six, sometimes
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 19:22, Sean Upton sdup...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Jürgen Herrmann
juergen.herrm...@xlhost.de wrote:
hi all!
is it possible to change permissions and roles on classes/methods
at runtime? normally you'd attach security declarations inline in
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 13:07, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
That would be great, for my part to be able to have the management tools
(packing and such) in a separate package than the object browsing
Excellent point.
(and even
the object actions, if you want to keep them, I don't
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 14:29, Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
On 2/1/12 8:21 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Should you then decide
that github is the place to host it, well, then git is the software
to use.
Actually, they introduced improved Subversion client support late last year
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:40, Alexandre Garel alex.ga...@tarentis.com wrote:
I'm a bit amazed by this argumentation. I think one important thing is that
subversion is centralized while dvcs are not.
And I think it's very unimportant.
With dvcs everyone got full history of zope libs. I
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 13:03, Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
- what RCS software to use
- where to host it
It may be easier if we disentangled them.
Traditionally it was easier, but now-a-days with github and bitbucket they
are harder to disentangle.
It is entangled, but it is
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 20:09, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have documented some of the darker corners of Zope's internals. I
put it in the Plone developer documentation for lack of a better
place, but it's not Plone-specific:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 06:12, Sareesh Sudhakaran ays...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have a personal project - a web application I wanted to develop - but I'm
confused on which route to take. I am not under any time constraint.
Your case is complex and the answer is non-obvious. I think you will
have
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 16:12, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
While I think there is definitely scope for simplifying the mix of
competing skin concepts in the Zope/CMF/Plone space, we need to be
careful not to bite off more than we can chew. We still have a lot of
CMF skin scripts and
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:52, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Hi Lennart,
I'm not sure if you're not mixing different issues here.
Am 17.11.2011, 11:35 Uhr, schrieb Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
Absolutely. Getting rid of CMFSkins is a part of getting rid of CMF
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 20:57, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
FWIW, the port to Python3 of substantial existing web framework code is
already a dubious proposition: nearly everybody doing it these days is
suffering pain (making their own code more complicated by straddling) in
order
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:24, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
It was removed in http://zope3.pov.lt/trac/changeset/122056 because it
wasn't actually being used anywhere. I'm not completely averse to
adding it back, but it does create confusion with the various
different alternatives in
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 16.11.2011, 12:49 Uhr, schrieb Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com:
Right. Could we standardize on skins or browserlayers plz? Having both
confuses the heck out of me.
Definitely a topic that needs (re
Do we really have to call it Zope 4? :-)
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 15:34, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leona...@nexedi.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the cross-post, but I'd like to talk about a possible sprint
topic for the next DZUG sprint[1], and invite myself to it :-)
After the last two rather
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:22, Brian Sutherland br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:26PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
I've managed to port zope.schema to Python 3.2 on a branch
(jinty-python3).
One doubt which has just crept up on me is if these classes:
ASCII,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:34, Babylakshmi Muthusamy
babylakshmim...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to know whether we can change the proxy error to site error
which wont affect the uptime of the site.
By default the proxy you have in front (Apache?) should not show 502
in these cases. This may
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 16:23, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
On 07/15/2011 03:13 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martijn Faassenfaas...@startifact.com
wrote:
I'd just call the category web framework; 2 out of 3 already say they
are. Zope can
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 00:17, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
- breaking the historic URLs for no purpose is lame, and would
cause useless pain to people with older installations that rely
on them (Yes, Virginia, there were automated buildouts before
zc.buildout).
True. Can
Will not having open bug reports as a fail again turn the buildbots
red again, and hence return the overview to uselessness?
//Lennart
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 07:00, Zope tests summarizer nore...@zope.org wrote:
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between
Whohoo! Amesome work all bugfixers!
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:00, Zope tests summarizer nore...@zope.org wrote:
This is the summary for test reports received on the
zope-tests list between 2011-06-20 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-06-21 00:00:00 UTC:
See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful
--
Lennart Regebro, Colliberty: http://www.colliberty.com/
Telephone: +48 691 268 328
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:12, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
One thing that I think is missing on the resource page is a Products
overview - PyPI isn't really suitable for someone wanting to see whether
Zope (2) is suitable for them and despite what we now think about
Oh! Nice!
IMO you can switch now. It's already a vast improvement, constructive
feedback and changes might improve it more, but it doesn't need to be
perfect before it's launched, just better. And it is.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:55, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
I think http://beta.zope.org/the-world-of-zope does a good job.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:28, Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
Hi,
On 5/10/11 12:55 AM, Andreas Jung wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I am happy to announce that we have made progress
with
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 17:36, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
If we decide to port zope.org-based projects to Python 3, please
please please, port them to Python 23 rather than relying on 2to3 (or
3to2). That is, update the code to work with both Python 2 and Python
3. Relying on 2to3 (or
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:11, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/9/11 09:09 , Suresh V. wrote:
Please see:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5603459/genericsetup-what-does-toolset-xml-accomplish-if-toolinit-still-has-to-be-called
I
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 07:56, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:57 -0400, Lennart Regebro wrote:
I'm still in Atlanta, and Arc Riley asked for a Zope person to
possibly mentor some zope.* project for Python Software Foundation
this year. They probably want to get
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:57, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 07:56, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Did this particular effort get to the place where there are students and
mentors lined up to do ZTK porting?
No, it got to the pace where I'm supposed
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 01:06, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Saturday, March 19, 2011, Lennart Regebro wrote:
Getting ZCA/ZTK to run on PyPy is probably easier, and actually more
useful. Maybe someone would want to mentor that?
While I would mentor someone wanting
I haven't read through the whole discussion in detail, so I'm sure I
repeat some of what has been said already, but here is my point of
view.
1. Yes, Grok is pretty implicit. If it's soo implecit is a matter of
taste, but much of the implicitness makes sense. You typically do have
a model and a
, the implementations in one file, and the
registrations separately (say, configure.py), thereby getting the same
separation as you had with interfaces.py, components.py and
configure.zcml. Your package just needs to *not* import the
configure.py file.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:47, Lennart Regebro rege
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 13:28, Stephan Richter
srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
On Monday, March 21, 2011, Lennart Regebro wrote:
So I'll sign up as a Zope team member.
Cool. But it turns out we need three to make a team (see
https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 14:17, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Anyway, Grok's configuration is dependent on the rules you give it, so
it's possible to have a completely explicit set of directives with no
implicit fallback to default values whatsoever. Martian supports that
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:28, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
This might be OK for @implements and maybe @adapts, which describe
behavior, but start feeling wonky to me for something like: @utility.
Well, the wonkyness comes from @utility *not* being inherited, while
@implements would be. That
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 22:08, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still in Atlanta, and Arc Riley asked for a Zope person to
possibly mentor some zope.* project for Python Software Foundation
this year. They probably
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 13:07, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 22:08, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still in Atlanta, and Arc Riley asked for a Zope person to
possibly mentor some
Getting ZCA/ZTK to run on PyPy is probably easier, and actually more
useful. Maybe someone would want to mentor that?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 22:08, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still in Atlanta, and Arc Riley
I'm still in Atlanta, and Arc Riley asked for a Zope person to
possibly mentor some zope.* project for Python Software Foundation
this year. They probably want to get more of the Zope Toolkit ported
to Python 3. I forwarded the roadmap to him, so anyone who wants to
mentor, that would be great.
We are here in Atlanta porting Zope stuff, and I've updated the
roadmap, so I thought I'd post it on zope-dev and python-porting, so
people know things are happening, and that they should have been here,
because PyCon was awesome!
So yesterday we've finished the porting of some low-hanging
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:05, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
I take that back, that documentation is incorrect, they have indeed
stopped working.
You are allowed to catch them, but not raise them. This is so you can
have code that runs on old Pythons with old libraries still.
But in
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 16:46, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
I was planning to work on getting buildout woring with Python 3 (if it
isn't done by then).
Awesome! I'll make sure to get up to speed on what the issues was with
my last attempt, because I forgot as usual.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 15:24, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hi there,
I thought it'd be interesting to note that PyPy 1.4.1 (with JIT) now
works out of the box with buildout
Awesome!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 14:32, Smita Kamdar sk0054...@techmahindra.com wrote:
Hi,
As suggested by you I have downloaded all the zope products of the same
version as they are on live to remove the mismatch of versions. But before I
install those products on dev environment, I will have to
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 07:52, Dan Gaibel d...@cornell.edu wrote:
So OS X Server Snow Leopard comes with Python 2.6.1. Is there any
reason to think that this Python version would cause problems with
Zope 2.8.6?
Yes, that would cause problems.
We have had nice stability with Python 2.3.5.
Do you really have to write your emails in large fonts and shocking pink? :-)
Anyway, it seems to me that the OpenFlow product has a rather special
way to be installed in Zope, with zexp imports and all. Maybe there is
an OpenFlow mailing list where people who are more used to the product
hangs
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 07:26, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
Who would be interested in a sprint, when, where and how?
I'd be interested in remote sprinting. I'm available now, FWIW.
OK, so it's me and you then. :-)
Let's talk in January about doing something and staying online at
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:37, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 11/25/10 11:31 , Lennart Regebro wrote:
Which style do you prefer? I'll make zope.hookable, zope.i18nmessage
and zope.proxy use the same style if we can agree on one.
The second. #ifdefs in code make code hard
I've been porting some zope.* modules that have C-extensions to Python
3, and with the C-preprocessor you have so many possibilities that I
get all confused. So I'd like some opinions. Or onions. Or something.
The big issue is the module definition, which is quite different in
Python 2 and
. I'd havetime for that in January, I think.
Of course, if people want to come to Krakow for a sprint I would be
happy host it. But you'd have to pay for plane tickets yourself. And
hotels, unless you want to sleep on my floor. :-)
Who would be interested in a sprint, when, where and how?
--
Lennart
Oh, and zc.buildout also exposes bugs in Distribute under Python 3, so
a new version of Distribute is needed before this can be finished. But
that could probably happen quite fast after I get most of the
zc.buildout tests running.
___
Zope-Dev maillist
I'm trying to port zope.proxy to Python 3, and most tests seem to
work, but investigating those two who doesn't is confusing. The first
one is the test to prevent pickling. This works under Python 2, but as
I understand it it should work by implementing a __reduce__ function
that throws an
Hmm, the tests failed for me without that change under Python 3.1, but
pass with it:
Weird.
How are you running the tests under Python3, BTW?
python3 setup.py test
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
like this:
from dtutil import rrule
rrule.whatevereblahlahlah()
I have the feeling (but I could be wrong) that there is a very long
distance from what you want to what you say you want. Maybe you can
explain what you actually want to do, your usecases etc.
--
Lennart Regebro, Colliberty: http
these events as you normally write your applications.
I need some flexible
way to both specify the intervals and interpret the intervals so that
the next event in a sequence can be specified in real time terms and
scheduled.
And that's what dateutil.rrule is for.
--
Lennart Regebro, Colliberty
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 22:12, Brian Sullivan briansulli...@gmail.com wrote:
On another forum this http://labix.org/python-dateutil was suggested
-- it looks to be close to what I was thinking --
I second that.
but I am not totally
sure how I can use it in Zope (a level of incompetence issue
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:00, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
What are the most obscure error conditions you've encountered while
developing Zopeish[1] applications?
[1] ZTK, Grok, Bluebream, the old Zope 3.x KGSes all qualify.
I'm talking about situations where the error
to Python 3 yet, but the same thing should happen there, yes.
--
Lennart Regebro, Colliberty: http://www.colliberty.com/
Python, Zope, Plone blog: http://regebro.wordpress.com/
Telephone: +33 661 58 14 64
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 13:26, Jonathan Lange j...@mumak.net wrote:
Just to be clear, is zope.testing 4.0.0 intended to work with Python 2?
Yes.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross
Am I doing something wrong? I have a dedicated python 2.6, and run
python2.6 dev.py and then bin/test.
--
Lennart Regebro, Colliberty: http://www.colliberty.com/
Python, Zope, Plone blog: http://regebro.wordpress.com/
Telephone: +33 661 58 14 64
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:38, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I doing something wrong? I have a dedicated python 2.6, and run
python2.6 dev.py and then bin/test.
I looked through the tests again, and some of the tests are clearly an
effect of using doctest instead
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:40, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:38, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I doing something wrong? I have a dedicated python 2.6, and run
python2.6 dev.py and then bin/test.
I looked through the tests again, and some
1 - 100 of 1118 matches
Mail list logo
