The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
efge
- "CMFSetup: provide non-ascii im- and exports",
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/292
jens
- "Discussion replies removal",
Tres Seaver wrote:
[..]
Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had
reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do
with them. They have no transitions (which is why the workflow actions
are gone), and they can't be fixed by the "Update Security" butt
> this makes sense. i'm -1 on the final CMFonFive piece landing in CMF
> 1.6 itself, though. the original scope for CMF 1.6 was "CMF 1.5 +
> GenericSetup", i don't see a compelling reason to complicate things by
> expanding that scope. if CMFonFive stays separate, then you can code it
> to suppo
On 5 Jan 2006, at 09:40, Lennart Regebro wrote:
this makes sense. i'm -1 on the final CMFonFive piece landing in CMF
1.6 itself, though. the original scope for CMF 1.6 was "CMF 1.5 +
GenericSetup", i don't see a compelling reason to complicate
things by
expanding that scope. if CMFonFive s
Hi Florent!
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 4 Jan 2006, at 20:17, Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 13 Dec 2005, at 13:50, yuppie wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On 13 Dec 2005, at 12:50, yuppie wrote:
I'd propose to implement an update mode for list properties and to
add an update file for each
On 5 Jan 2006, at 12:05, yuppie wrote:
I can't find any code for purge="False".
This is only on the trunk. The _importNode methods of
ActionCategoryNodeAdapter and ActionNodeAdapter look for an
optional 'purge' attribute.
Ah ok, I had looked at CMF 1.6 only.
Workflow bindings don't need
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had
reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do
with them. They have no transitions (which is why the workflow actions
are gone), and they can't be fixed by the "Update Security" button,
be
On 1/5/06, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I didn't follow this discussion closely, so you want to merge
> the last remnants of CMFonFive into CMF 1.6 and 2.0, is that the
> suggestion?
It's already merged into CMF 2.0 (although it's not actuall *working* yet. ;) )
So it's only 1
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:07:07 +0100, Florent Guillaume
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Objects which have a no-longer-sane review_state have *never* had
reasonable behavior: the workflow engine *can't* compute what to do
with them. They have no transitions (which is why the wor
Is there a fix for:
"When installing CMFPhoto and Album from Add/Remove Products, it says
the product is broken with the following Install log transcript:
2006-01-05 09:23:33
failed:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/opt/zope/2.8.4/Products/CMFQuickInstallerTool/QuickInstallerTool.py"
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
Is there a fix for:
"When installing CMFPhoto and Album from Add/Remove Products, it says
the product is broken with the following Install log transcript:
Your Plone is too new ;-)
Plone doesn't have nor use the navigation_properties
since 2.0 (about two years ago)
Rap
Hello all, I would like to restrict what a Plone user can add based on
the folder they are currently navigating in. For instance, I have a
folder named My Protocols. I only want a user that is a member of the
group 'Staff' to be able to add 1) folders. 2) CMFQuestion
questionnaires and 3) a c
Ut-oh. The Add/Remove Products tells me ' This product has been
upgraded, click here to reinstall. Filesystem version is' but when I
click it gives:
Site error
This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The
errors were:
Error Type
AttributeError
Error Value
navig
Hello again all,
I have created a nice CMFQuestion questionnaire that I would like to
be available on the Add item dropdown. So instead of adding a generic
questionnaire from Add item, you would be able to add an already
populated questionnaire. Is there a simple way of doing this?
Can you t
Alexander Limi wrote:
Florent Guillaume:
That's been the intent of the code all along: when you query the
workflow tool and ask it for the state of an object, this is passed
along to DCWorkflow, and if the object doesn't have a state anymore
the initial state is returned.
However if you r
I've found the partial answer through the 'Settings...' on the drop
down only it doesn't seem to want to save my restrictions.
-- IV
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:46:28 -0600
"Ignacio Valdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all, I would like to restrict what a Plone user can add based
on the fold
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
I've found the partial answer through the 'Settings...' on the drop down
only it doesn't seem to want to save my restrictions.
This 'Settings ...' option is actually purely Plone/ATCT specific.
You might have better chances to get an answer to your question
on the plone-us
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
Ut-oh. The Add/Remove Products tells me ' This product has been
upgraded, click here to reinstall. Filesystem version is' but when I
click it gives:
Site error
This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The
errors were:
Error Type
AttributeErro
Ah-hah! I was wondering if such lists existed:
http://plone.org/contact/index_html/?searchterm=plone-users%20list
Wish there was a tab for this on plone.org
-- IV
On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:12:19 +0100
Raphael Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
I've found the partial answer th
Ignacio Valdes wrote:
Ah-hah! I was wondering if such lists existed:
http://plone.org/contact/index_html/?searchterm=plone-users%20list
Wish there was a tab for this on plone.org
Your wish is granted. It's the "contact" tab, though that doesn't seem
like the best name.
--jc
Lennart Regebro wrote:
this makes sense. i'm -1 on the final CMFonFive piece landing in CMF
1.6 itself, though. the original scope for CMF 1.6 was "CMF 1.5 +
GenericSetup", i don't see a compelling reason to complicate things by
expanding that scope. if CMFonFive stays separate, then you can c
On 1/5/06, Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe i'm being dense, but i don't see how merging the code into the CMF
> core improves this. if i'm understanding this correctly, you wouldn't
> be increasing the number of supported combinations at all;
No, I'd just get rid of a whole lot of p
Lennart Regebro wrote:
And CMF 1.6 already has more changes that just GenericSetup, some of
which are already causing me other headaches.
which are these? the most significant changes are in the TypesTool, and
this was done in order to achieve more parity btn the 1.6 and 2.0 site
creation co
On 1/5/06, Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > And CMF 1.6 already has more changes that just GenericSetup, some of
> > which are already causing me other headaches.
>
> which are these? the most significant changes are in the TypesTool, and
> this was done in order
On 1/5/06, Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've managed to get Plone working with this rather well, but if you're
> having major headaches we could consider changing this.
Nah, I solved them now. But it involves having the tests load_site()
three times. :-)
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo h
25 matches
Mail list logo
