[Tim Peters]
>> The first time ZConfig and zdaemon get tagged, it's
>> important that whoever do that first search all
>> clients (ZODB and both Zopes) for changes to those
>> checked in from a wrong project, and do merges back
>> to ZConfig and zdaemon (I explained that dance last
>> time) -- else
--On Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 9:07 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- the ZConfig and zdaemon should have a minimal release management
(means stable released should be tagged properly)
Definitely needed.
So let's do it. Amen. Tagging a package should not be so much overhead
for the
[Andreas Jung]
> ...
> So for Zope 2.8 this means to me:
>
> - the ZConfig and zdaemon should have a minimal release management
> (means stable released should be tagged properly)
Definitely needed.
> - ZODB development can be done against any version
>
> - ZODB releases should done against a de
--On Donnerstag, 12. Mai 2005 12:53 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
@Jim: what's your opinion on this subject?
Jim likes copies better than externals. If you can get him to explain
why, you should win a fabulous prize . But, regardless, you and
Brian (I think) are in charge o
[Tim Peters]
>> People who think they understand those projects first need to make
>> tags, so Zope 2.8 has something to point _to_. Also, Zope, Zope3, and
>> ZODB should all coordinate to make sure they're using the same tags
>> for zdaemon and ZConfig. Else, e.g., I develop ZODB using a ZConfig
--On Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 14:11 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From my point of view it would make sense to replace the copies in the
2.8 tree with external references for the next beta...any objections?
People who think they understand those projects first need to make
tags,
[Andreas Jung]
> A quick diff over the the ZConfig trunk and the version 2.8 shows that the
> ZConfig version on the trunk is the "maintained" version. But I have no
> idea about zdaemon.
repos/main/XYZ/trunk is always "the official" current development home
for project XYZ. Zope, Zope3, ZODB, ZC
--On Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 12:59 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Andreas Jung]
do I see right that we have two different ZConfig versions in the SVN?
One one the root level
and one under Zope/lib/python? Shouldn't we unify the versions by making
the most current version the mas
[Andreas Jung]
>> do I see right that we have two different ZConfig versions in the SVN?
>> One one the root level
>> and one under Zope/lib/python? Shouldn't we unify the versions by making
>> the most current version the master?
[yuppie]
> Other copies are here:
>
> http://svn.zope.org/Zope3/tru
Andreas Jung wrote:
do I see right that we have two different ZConfig versions in the SVN?
One one the root level
and one under Zope/lib/python? Shouldn't we unify the versions by making
the most current version
the master?
Other copies are here:
http://svn.zope.org/Zope3/trunk/src/ZConfig/
http:
10 matches
Mail list logo
