Hi , i have installed plone rpm on rh8 linux,
Apparently zope, cmf also got installed which i really
needed.Later installed archetypes in plone.
Now when i use any of the archetypes stuff like
Archetypescontent example, tool i get the following
error on clicking the view tab.
Brad Clements wrote:
Sorry if is OT.
I'd like ZODB and Zope to support Revisions. That is, historical copies that do not get
removed when ZODB is packed.
Does the Version mechanism contribute to this kind of functionality?
No, not really. Maybe it can be coached into doing it, but not without
m
Anthony Baxter wrote:
Oliver Bleutgen wrote
As you and Guido are talking about the ZMI (which means, AFAIK, the
managament interface), let me just say that as far as I understand it,
deprecating/marking-as-evil and even removing OFSP/Version.py is not
what I would like to see happen (not only).
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 17:40, Brad Clements wrote:
> Sorry if is OT.
>
> I'd like ZODB and Zope to support Revisions. That is, historical copies
> that do not get removed when ZODB is packed.
DirectoryStorage allows you to designate classes that should have all their
history kept indefinitely.
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 07:16 pm, alan milligan wrote:
> Personally, I am a bit sceptical about the whole Interface concept.
> Fortunately because Python supports multiple inheritance, it's not like the
> Java mechanism. But it strikes me as being much too like the concept of a
> pure abstra
>>> Oliver Bleutgen wrote
> As you and Guido are talking about the ZMI (which means, AFAIK, the
> managament interface), let me just say that as far as I understand it,
> deprecating/marking-as-evil and even removing OFSP/Version.py is not
> what I would like to see happen (not only).
>
> The
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 03:04 pm, alan milligan wrote:
> As you may recall, I made a posting regarding this Zope-specific pydoc tool
> over a week ago.
Um, maybe I'm out of line here, but "over a week ago" sounds
like a really short time ago.
> Since then there has been half a dozen downloads,
thanks for the two responses.
by "remove Data.fs.lock", do you mean remove the file or empty the file?
Also could never subsribe to any of the zope lists, because never receive the confirmation email. anyone has a clue? shall appreciate it.
Althea ChaseeAndreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Guys,
As you may recall, I made a posting regarding this Zope-specific pydoc tool
over a week ago.
Since then there has been half a dozen downloads, but I am yet to receive
any feedback :(
I know that documentation is about as exciting as a really unexciting thing,
but would like just five mi
Remove var/Data.fs.lock, restart Zope and promise to avoid cross-posts
in the future.
-aj
--On Mittwoch, 4. Juni 2003 11:37 Uhr -0700 chasee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi:
I got this error, when starting the Zope server again. I have had this
problem before, then I found out there was another
Hi:
I got this error, when starting the Zope server again. I have had this problem before, then I found out there was another processing I did not kill still running the server. this time, I made sure I had no other processes that are running the server or making use of any files in Zope. Plea
Paul Winkler wrote at 2003-6-3 14:00 -0400:
> ...
> It's been proposed that Versions should be
> at least stamped in the ZMI with big warnings, or possibly disabled
> altogether.
> ...
> Comments?
-3
I like versions and use them from time to time to automically
install changes on life serve
Hi:
I got this error, when starting the Zope server again. I have had this problem before, then I found out there was another processing I did not kill still running the server. this time, I made sure I had no other processes that are running the server or making use of any files in Zope. Pleas
Can I, a humble Zope product developer, please make
a plea that anything "marked as an 'official evil'" be made
as invisible as possible? (I.e. that you make it disappear
unless specifically configured as an option, as was
suggested up-thread).
Zope is already full of deprecated methods that mak
Hi Andrew,
here are the answers:
>-Messaggio originale-
>Da: Andrew R. Halko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Inviato: mercoledì 4 giugno 2003 17.02
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Oggetto: DBtab and BDBStorage
>Hello Fabio,
>I read your post at:
>http://zope.nipltd.com/publi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I remember correctly, though, there was still a lot in question about
legitimate use cases. The web-services cluster-safety use-case I sketched
out here (http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2002-October/003112.html)
is still (perhaps) a valid case, but ONLY in a ve
Sorry if is OT.
I'd like ZODB and Zope to support Revisions. That is, historical copies that do not
get
removed when ZODB is packed.
Does the Version mechanism contribute to this kind of functionality? I'd like to be
able to "tag" revisions of wiki pages and other documents, and then be able t
If I remember correctly, though, there was still a lot in question about
legitimate use cases. The web-services cluster-safety use-case I sketched
out here (http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2002-October/003112.html)
is still (perhaps) a valid case, but ONLY in a very-carefully constructed
Hello Fabio,
I read your post at:
http://zope.nipltd.com/public/lists/dev-archive.nsf/AGByKey/35A02E5C64B9
3519 about DBtab and BDBStorage. I am interested in doing the same
thing. I have a Plone site that I expect to become very large and I
need to find some other solutions than ZODB and its 2G
19 matches
Mail list logo
