[Martijn Faassen]
> Yes, I'm doing something much like that and it works fine on Linux. I'm
> just wondering how this de-confuses Python's import system on a
> case-insensitive file system.
Python imports are case-sensitive on all platforms (this wasn't always true,
but is true in recent Pythons).
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I don't understand what this means. A different directory on the
python path?
I would recommend leaving old Zope2 stuff in lib/python and putting
all Z3-related stuff in a parallel directory called 'src'. That way
y
On Friday 04 June 2004 12:33 pm, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hm, that's not a big deal then. I'm just at a loss how this would fix
> the case-insensitivity import problem on Windows; I think I'm missing
> something.
Modern Windows is case-preserving, and Python uses that to get the imports
right.
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I don't understand what this means. A different directory on the python
path?
I would recommend leaving old Zope2 stuff in lib/python and putting all
Z3-related stuff in a parallel directory called 'src'. That way you can
run a whole Zope
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
So what does this mean for Five on Windows?
It means that you should tell people to put zope in
a different directory than Zope. Both of these directories need
to be on the Python path.
Hm, that's not a big deal then. I'm just at a
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
So what does this mean for Five on Windows?
It means that you should tell people to put zope in
a different directory than Zope. Both of these directories need
to be on the Python path.
Hm, that's not a big deal then. I'm just at a loss how this would fix
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I chose alternative 4 from:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/RenameTheZopePackage
As that seemed to be the most popular, although I personnally prefer
3.
Resolving this peacefully is becoming more urgent for me as I'd
like to be able to use
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I chose alternative 4 from:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/RenameTheZopePackage
As that seemed to be the most popular, although I personnally prefer
3.
Resolving this peacefully is becoming more urgent for me as I'd
like to be able to use
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
I chose alternative 4 from:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/RenameTheZopePackage
As that seemed to be the most popular, although I personnally prefer
3.
Resolving this peacefully is becoming more urgent for me as I'd
like to be able to use Five (Zope 3 on Zope 2)
[Stefan H. Holek]
> As BDBStorage has been removed from HEAD quite some time ago, I was
> wondering whether it would be possible/advisable to remove it from 2.7
> branch as well. Would it?
I think it would, because there's no resource to maintain it. BDBStorage
was released as an experiment: Zop
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I recall discussion but no conclusion: what is the status of the
case-conflict between the "Zope" package in Zope 2 versus the "zope"
package in Zope 3?
I chose alternative 4 from:
http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/RenameTheZopePackage
As that seemed to be the most popu
As BDBStorage has been removed from HEAD quite some time ago, I was
wondering whether it would be possible/advisable to remove it from 2.7
branch as well. Would it?
Stefan
--
The time has come to start talking about whether the emperor is as well
dressed as we are supposed to think he is.
12 matches
Mail list logo