Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A, B and C are folders nested in each other i.e. A/B/C. A user does not
have access to A and B but he does have access to C. If getObject uses
restrictedTraverse it returns None immediately when traversing A, even
though the user is allowed to access
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:34:10AM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
[Sidnei da Silva]
Humm... we are trying to push a Zope 2.8 beta out, do you have or know
of plans to use ZODB 3.4 with Zope 2.8?
Yes. Jim needs to fix ZClasses for 2.8 too. ZODB 3.4 requires some
Zope(3) features, like
Hi all,
There have been a number of threads going on today re:
Zope X3.1 feature freeze and the 2.8 effort. I'd like to
clarify some decisions re: Zope 2.8
Jim is the product mgr for Zope 3 and I'm it for Zope 2, so
hopefully this can be considered authoritative and end part
of this thread
Hey everybody,
We're wrapping up here at a very pleasant and productive Zope 2/3/Five
sprint here in Paris. We've accomplished quite a lot, and we'll let you
hear what this is in more detail soon.
We've spent a lot of time with Zope 2.8, integrating Zope X3.0 and
Five into it.
Our work is on
--On Freitag, 18. März 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- In the next few days at most, after a few loose ends are
wrapped up, we'll ask Andreas to make a 2.8 beta 1 release.
While Jim still has a few things to do, people will be able
to start using the
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:22:26AM -0500, Brian Lloyd wrote:
[snip]
- Zope 2.8 will include X3.0 (not X3.1)
- The Z3 developers will have *no* extra burden or
responsibility to support X3.0 beyond what they
would normally do in the normal course of maintaining
it for
Brian Lloyd wrote:
Hi all,
There have been a number of threads going on today re:
Zope X3.1 feature freeze and the 2.8 effort. I'd like to
clarify some decisions re: Zope 2.8
Very much excellent! This, Jims announcement of the April 2 feature
freeze datem and Stephans statement that he was
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Freitag, 18. M?rz 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- In the next few days at most, after a few loose ends are
wrapped up, we'll ask Andreas to make a 2.8 beta 1 release.
While Jim still has
--On Freitag, 18. März 2005 18:03 Uhr +0100 Martijn Faassen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Freitag, 18. M?rz 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- In the next few days at most, after a few loose ends are
Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
Do some of these have something to do with a change to Python 2.4, by
the way?
No.
It's a bit unclear to me what version of Python this release is
targetting.
2.3
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540)
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Freitag, 18. März 2005 18:03 Uhr +0100 Martijn Faassen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:42:05PM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Freitag, 18. M?rz 2005 11:22 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- In the next few days at most, after a few
[Martijn Faassen]
...
Do some of these have something to do with a change to Python 2.4, by
the way?
[Jim Fulton]
No.
If you're using the Python 2.4 line, some of the security changes
triggered a Python bug that will be fixed in 2.4.1 (which is currently
in release candidate 2 status).
- The Z3 developers will have *no* extra burden or
responsibility to support X3.0 beyond what they
would normally do in the normal course of maintaining
it for Z3-only applications. In other words, it is not
the responsibility of Z3 devs to make sure Z2 tests
pass,
- It *will be* the responsibility of the Zope 2 devs to
make sure Z2 works with the version of Z3 bundled at the
time.
snip
It'd be great if active Z3 developers could actually help make new
releases of Z2 once Five is integrated but the above makes it sound
like
a we'll throw it over
Chris wrote:
I assume these caveats are spelled out here because Z3
developers don't
want to slow down Z3 development to test/maintain Z2 compatibility. I
know a lot about Z2 code, but I know very little about Z3 code. I'd
like that to change, but it's likely that I'll just not have the
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 13:45, Brian Lloyd wrote:
A lot of time was spent talking about these (legitimate) concerns -
unfortunately it will probably take a little time to distill all
of that communication to the community. But let me take a shot ;)
There are several different groups, with
There are a significant and growing number of people in group B.
Yup, that makes sense. Are these assumed to also be the
folks who will
try to make sure that new Z3 releases make it in to Z2 via Five? I
guess what I'm driving at is that I'd hate to eventually have
a very old version
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:49:01 +0100, Martijn Jacobs wrote:
Hello guys.
I have a question regarding product importing in zope 2.7.x, as since
zope 2.7 this part is way more flexible then it was before. I'd like to
accomplish the next situation :
-
A Zope base installation has Product X
[Martijn Faassen]
Oh, also please note that we're merging zope.interfaces and zope.testing
into Zope 2.8 already. So once we merge that branch (today, we expect),
AFAICT, that didn't land today, at least not on the trunk.
ZODB 3.4 could be merged in. But I'm worried that there are other
Title: Cookie problem with mySqlUserFolder
Hello everyone:
I am facing the problem regarding cookie.
One of our website uses mySqlUserFolder.
Problem is if user logs on one computer, and if he/she comes again on same computer, computer remembers him/her. That is good as it is what we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Parrot 0.1.2 was released a couple of weeks ago. According to the
release notes, there's now better python support, separated into
dynaclasses.
Unfortunately, I haven't really managed to keep up with the Parrot
project, but I think it quite possibly
21 matches
Mail list logo
