Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Gary Poster wrote:
>>> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal,
>>> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly
>>> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
>> Zope Frame
Chris Withers wrote:
> Gary Poster wrote:
>> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal,
>> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly
>> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
>
> Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Lennart Regebro wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 08:32, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>>> Because members put there content (product implementations) still usable?
>> Absolutely right. In the long run that should probably be moved over
>>
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 17:23, Tres Seaver wrote:
> PyPI won't work for non-eggified products.
Right, so they need to be eggified then, which is a Good Thing. :)
I'm not saying they should be moved *now*. Just in the long run. If
the product is still maintained and cared about, eggifying it and
mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 08:32, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Because members put there content (product implementations) still usable?
>
> Absolutely right. In the long run that should probably be moved over
> to PyPI though.
PyPI
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 08:32, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Because members put there content (product implementations) still usable?
Absolutely right. In the long run that should probably be moved over
to PyPI though.
--
Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista.
http://regebro.wordpress.com/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote at 2009-4-2 21:29 +0100:
>> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> Andrew & others have been working on this issue at the sprint. There is
>>> consensus that www.zope.org must be turned into landing page with some
>>> missio
Chris Withers wrote at 2009-4-2 21:29 +0100:
>Andreas Jung wrote:
>> Andrew & others have been working on this issue at the sprint. There is
>> consensus that www.zope.org must be turned into landing page with some
>> mission statement and then links to the related subprojects. The current
>> zope.
Gary Poster wrote:
>
> Within the constraints above, then, in line with your original proposal,
> I think we'd be fine with "Zope Framework," and "Zope 2." We certainly
> don't need Zope-3-the-tarball, if that's what you meant.
Zope Framework (and maybe even ZF4) seems to have general agreemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 22:52 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> We might discuss this unhurriedly. To sleep and being in vacation mood
>> in order to discuss this now :-) At least the term 'classic' is a NO-GO
>> for me.
>
> Why? Would you pref
Andreas Jung wrote:
> We might discuss this unhurriedly. To sleep and being in vacation mood
> in order to discuss this now :-) At least the term 'classic' is a NO-GO
> for me.
Why? Would you prefer 'a' or maybe 'old'? ;-)
>>> microsite or somewhere else. The point is that the release should
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 22:45 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>> I'd imagine the full set of releases would appear on the respective
>>> parts of classic.zope.org or advanced.zope.org...
>>
>> *shrug* I don't care if those releases on the new zo
Andreas Jung wrote:
>> I'd imagine the full set of releases would appear on the respective
>> parts of classic.zope.org or advanced.zope.org...
>
> *shrug* I don't care if those releases on the new zope2.zope.org
Please not zope2.zope.org, the insane version naming has *got* to stop...
> microsi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 22:37 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>>
>> Because we can't break existing download URL - neither to old Zope
>> releases
>
> I'd imagine the full set of releases would appear on the respective
> parts of classic.zope.o
Andreas Jung wrote:
>
> Because we can't break existing download URL - neither to old Zope
> releases
I'd imagine the full set of releases would appear on the respective
parts of classic.zope.org or advanced.zope.org...
> nor to old product releases.
I wonder how many of these are actually s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 22:29 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> Andreas Jung wrote:
>> Andrew & others have been working on this issue at the sprint. There is
>> consensus that www.zope.org must be turned into landing page with some
>> mission statement and then links
Andreas Jung wrote:
> Andrew & others have been working on this issue at the sprint. There is
> consensus that www.zope.org must be turned into landing page with some
> mission statement and then links to the related subprojects. The current
> zope.org site should be moved to old.zope.org (it must
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.04.2009 22:17 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
> I'd *really* like to see the majority of the current www.zope.org simply
> eradicated from existence. It's out of date and a source of nothing but
> confusion.
>
Andrew & others have been working on t
Jim Fulton wrote:
> We and canonical use the Zope Framework. We don't use an
> application. Zope (aka Zope 2) is an extensible application. We (ZC
> and Canonical and others) assemble components from the Zope Framework
> to build our own applications.
Hmm, maybe I got this wrong, but Gary
On Apr 2, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> What Martijn has announced and is already being worked on
>>> extensively.
>>>
>>> - Zope A 4.0
>>>
>>> What was to be Zope 2.12
>>>
>>> - Zope B 4.0
>>>
>>> Whatever the next pending release of the Zope 3 appserver stuff
Jim Fulton wrote:
>> What Martijn has announced and is already being worked on extensively.
>>
>> - Zope A 4.0
>>
>> What was to be Zope 2.12
>>
>> - Zope B 4.0
>>
>> Whatever the next pending release of the Zope 3 appserver stuff was to
>> be. (Need to keep the Canonical and ZC guys happy afterall
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Remember this:
>
> http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/04/01/parrot.htm
>
> Well, that lead to this:
>
> http://www.parrot.org/
>
> One of the reasons I got suckered into replying was that I thought
> this
> might be the result of some stuff a few of
Remember this:
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/04/01/parrot.htm
Well, that lead to this:
http://www.parrot.org/
One of the reasons I got suckered into replying was that I thought this
might be the result of some stuff a few of us had talked about at the
Zope BOF at PyCon.
I actually think hav
23 matches
Mail list logo
