Hello,
Tres Seaver wrote:
When you use 'svn:externals', the referenced package itself is *not*
part of the containing checkout; it is managed separately by the svn
client (sort of like ESI and page fragments).
Yes this is true. But the differences between svn:externals and a copy are not
so
--On Donnerstag, 31. März 2005 15:28 Uhr +0530 JV Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello.
I need some help with this.
I installed zope using 'apt-get install zope2.7' and then 'apt-get
install plone'...
But in the zope 'Add' list, I can't see any of the additionally
installed components,
Brian Lloyd wrote:
I did a merge from the five-integration branch to the head
in a local sandbox, and got the following test failures -
anyone know anything about them?
Odd, I don't get any failures, and Stefan Holek cannot report them
either. Did these get resolved since then? It looks like
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'd like to disable FTP by default, by commenting it out in
skel/etc/zope.conf. The reason is that it's better to open as few ports
as possible by default.
Opinions ?
+1, but only for 2.8
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-
In this case, the answer is clear to me. :)
We should fix the offending Z3 code to match the interface.
Similarly, we should fix the uses of get_transaction.
Jim
Tim Peters wrote:
I'm merging ZODB 3.4 into Zope on a branch. As Tres noted earlier in
a checkin comment, a test failure results,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
[snip]
get_transaction() is more troublesome than _just_ that, alas: there
are about 160 instances of it across the stitched-in lib/python/zope,
and Products/Five, code. This causes lots of new deprecation warnings
when running the tests. These are easy
Chris Withers wrote:
Well, in 2.8, new behaviour is expected, right?
I really passionately believe that we should not be returnining None in
Zope 2.8, and since 2.8 hasn't quite hit beta yet I'm very keen to see
it fixed asap.
Any objections?
Most of my queries, where I need to wake up objects,
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:02 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
Would anyone object if I wrote tests and changed the implementation to
raise exceptions, including Unauthorized, instead of returning None?
Unauthorized in getObject is out of the question, that would be new
behaviour.
Well,
Chris Withers wrote:
You're mistaken. The old code did:
def getObject(self, REQUEST=None):
Try to return the object for this record
try:
obj = self.aq_parent.unrestrictedTraverse(self.getPath())
if not obj:
if REQUEST is None:
[Tim Peters]
...
get_transaction() is more troublesome than _just_ that, alas: there
are about 160 instances of it across the stitched-in lib/python/zope,
and Products/Five, code. This causes lots of new deprecation warnings
when running the tests. These are easy to repair with 1-2 hours
[Brian Lloyd]
I did a merge from the five-integration branch to the head
in a local sandbox, and got the following test failures -
anyone know anything about them?
[Martijn Faassen]
Odd, I don't get any failures, and Stefan Holek cannot report them
either. Did these get resolved since then?
Pavel Zaitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering what code in Zope 2.7.5-final potentially may use /tmp
directory for temprorary files.
Lots. There are many uses of the tempfile python module, which uses the
TMPDIR, TEMP or TMP environment variables to decide where to stick its
temporary
[Martijn Faassen]
Odd, I don't get any failures, and Stefan Holek cannot report them
either. Did these get resolved since then? It looks like the merge got
checked in, right?
The merge was checked in. I'm doing the ZODB 3.4 integration on a new
branch. We suspect Brian's failures
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:52:11AM -0500, Pavel Zaitsev wrote:
| snip if someone knows of what circuimstances zope would use /tmp
| directory to create a file...
Anytime the request coming in is bigger than the config variable
'large-file-threshold' (see INSTANCE_HOME/etc/zope.conf), the
request
I did not understand why people why replying the same answer as I did:
that simple I did not reply to the mailing list ;)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Patrick DECAT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:50:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] zope /tmp file usage
To: Pavel
[Tim Peters]
...
Suggestion: I make a new copy of
Zope3/tags/ZopeX3-3.0.0-Zope-2.8-pr1/src/zope
stitch that into Zope trunk (change the lib/python svn:externals to
point to the new copy), do all the get_transaction() edits there, and
repair the IDataManager glitch there too. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Langner wrote:
Hello,
Tres Seaver wrote:
When you use 'svn:externals', the referenced package itself is *not*
part of the containing checkout; it is managed separately by the svn
client (sort of like ESI and page fragments).
Yes
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tim Peters wrote:
[snip]
get_transaction() is more troublesome than _just_ that, alas: there
are about 160 instances of it across the stitched-in lib/python/zope,
and Products/Five, code. This causes lots of new deprecation warnings
when running the
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
Right, lib/python/zope is actually Zope X3.0.0, and we didn't expect
we'd need to *update* Zope X3.0 in order for it to work with Zope 2.8.
The new ZODB version is having some
Tim Peters wrote:
[Tim Peters]
...
get_transaction() is more troublesome than _just_ that, alas: there
are about 160 instances of it across the stitched-in lib/python/zope,
and Products/Five, code. This causes lots of new deprecation warnings
when running the tests. These are easy to repair
Tim Peters wrote:
[Tim Peters]
...
Suggestion: I make a new copy of
Zope3/tags/ZopeX3-3.0.0-Zope-2.8-pr1/src/zope
stitch that into Zope trunk (change the lib/python svn:externals to
point to the new copy), do all the get_transaction() edits there, and
repair the IDataManager glitch there too.
I did not understand why people was replying the same answer as I did.
That's simple: I did not reply to the mailing list ;)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Patrick DECAT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:50:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] zope /tmp file usage
To: Pavel
[Martijn Faassen, on deprecation warnings]
Thanks; I haven't seen those warnings yet as I don't think ZODB 3.4
quite got merged into Zope 2.8 trunk yet.
Not even close yet. I'm doing the 3,4 integration work on
Zope/branches/tim-merge-zodb34
and I'm not merging anything into the trunk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
Right, lib/python/zope is actually Zope X3.0.0, and we didn't expect
we'd need to *update* Zope
Zope trunk is using ZODB 3.4 now. It's been switched to use
svn:externals to stitch in the 9 ZODB directories. For now they're
pointing at ZODB trunk. A release tag will be made later (this is
_not_ ready for release yet; now I can start doing the work I wanted
to start doing on Monday 0.5
| At one point during the Zope/branches/tim-merge-zodb34 merge on my
| local box, svn got itself terminally confused, starting to create
| directories like lib/lib/python/ZODB (there are two lib/s in that --
| not a typo), and griping endlessly about locks and non-existent files.
| No amount of
[Sidnei da Silva]
Got one problem so far:
svn: Failed to add directory 'lib/python/BTrees/tests': object of the
same name already exists
Everything else seems to have updated with no problems to that point.
Ugh -- I'm afraid that's the very first of the 9 ZODB directories it
tried to
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 03:33:11PM -0500, Tim Peters wrote:
| Ugh -- I'm afraid that's the very first of the 9 ZODB directories it
| tried to update, and svn just isn't smart enough to delete the
| existing directories before trying to fetch the new ones.
Indeed it was. I think its a Good Thing.
I try to edit zope file in zope istalled directory, HTTPServer in
particular, i want to debug some things,
but I get syntax errors on any code i try insert like a=1 , or 'print'.
like:
#
/opt/web/bin/runzope
Was a spacing issue thanks to #zope on freenode,
pavel
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Hi,
I am planning to make the release tomorrow (Saturday afternoon (German time
:-)). So please make
your final fixes very soon or cry out loud STOP if there are any show
stoppers.
Andreas
pgp17zL6Dn1uH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev
Hi Andreas - please don't cut the release until we get the
OK from Tim Peters - he's still working on merging recent
ZODB changes, I believe.
Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V.P. Engineering 540.361.1716
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com
-Original Message-
Ok, I am waiting for go ahead sign (I haven't followed the recent
discussion because I am currently on a business trip)
-aj
--On Freitag, 1. April 2005 0:13 Uhr -0500 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andreas - please don't cut the release until we get the
OK from Tim Peters - he's still
33 matches
Mail list logo
