Can anyone point me to the location of the configuration file for the
Windows install in CVS? I'm sure Brian pointed it out to me once, but I cant
find it at the moment...
--
Andy McKay
Agmweb Consulting
http://www.agmweb.ca
___
Zope-Dev mailli
Actually, I believe that NT Workstation ran dynamic web apps better than NT
server. This was because the tuning on NT server out of the box was really
geared toward file-server type applications. I assume the case is the same
with win2k. At that, I don't think is would be noticeable enough, exc
I wouldn't say so. I used to run Zope on a Win2k A/S and the perf was not
noticably better than on a similar Pro machine.
Adrian...
--
Adrian Hungate
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.haqa.co.uk
- Original Message -
From: "Arndt Droullier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> This, however, is almost an order of magnitude difference, and may need
> further investigation...
>
> Adam
>
There´s also a difference between Win2000 and Win2000 Server. The Server
version is optimised for network and system operations(thread/memory
allocation) and really much faster than
For what its worth, a long time ago, with an ancient version of Zope running
on the original W2k Professional on my home machine (minus any service
packs), Zope (running as a service) was magnitudes of order slower after
coming back from a system Hibernate; I no longer hibernate/power-manage
Win2k
FWIW, I just checked in a signal handler to the trunk that makes it
possible on UNIX to do "kill -USR1 `cat var/Z2.pid`" and pack the
database to 0 days, so all this business about packing TTW and whether
you need to let the browser wait or not is for naught. ;-)
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chri
> "TD" == Toby Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> although we may do one more beta release to add some performance
>> improvements.
TD> Do you have something specific in mind?
I'd like to change this bit of code in handle_write():
if n < len(v):
# XX
>
>I'm not sure that is the case you know. Oracle 9i Linux is faster on my
>Linux Athlon 800 than the same release on my Win2k Dual Piii 1GHz.
>
>Also my Win box has 1Gb ram, while my Linux box has only 512Mb...
In other news Apache is reported to run faster on Linux that Win2000,
as is Po
One thing to remember is that running multi-treaded Python apps on a
multi-processor box is suboptimal unless you can bind all the threads to a
single processor, due to the Python GIL.
So, I'm not surprised that a 800MHz Athlon outperforms a dual 1GHz Piii with
Zope, regardless of OS. As for O
From: "Shane Hathaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Adrian Hungate wrote:
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>I have a question for you zope administrators out there :
> >>What are your experiences whith zope running on Windows NT/2K? No matter
> >>what I try , zope will run significant
Adrian Hungate wrote:
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have a question for you zope administrators out there :
>>What are your experiences whith zope running on Windows NT/2K? No matter
>>what I try , zope will run significant faster on a Unixlike system
>>(with the same hardware), e
On Wednesday 28 Aug 2002 4:04 pm, Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
> Toby Dickenson wrote:
> >>On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chris Withers wrote:
> >>>I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the
> >>>stop button or the connection dies.
> >
> > Thats probably impossible if there is
Toby Dickenson wrote:
>>On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chris Withers wrote:
>
>
>>>I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the
>>>stop button or the connection dies.
>>
>
> Thats probably impossible if there is an HTTP proxy between your browser and
> zope.
Why?
It s
Chris McDonough wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Do you have any implementation suggestions?
Find a pub and make myself less sober?
LSD also springs to mind for the thinks-laterally-department...
*grinz*
Seriously, no, but I hope this is something that's been raised on the Zope 3
radar...
Chris
___
> On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chris Withers wrote:
> > I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the
> > stop button or the connection dies.
Thats probably impossible if there is an HTTP proxy between your browser and
zope.
> > I don't is the is context.REQUEST.RESP
Chris,
Do you have any implementation suggestions?
- C
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 07:49, Chris Withers wrote:
> I know I'm late in on this thread, but I thought I'd throw in my views.
>
> I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the stop
> button or the connection dies.
Steve Alexander wrote:
> Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
>
> Although Zope has a "response stream" method of sending information back
> to the client, most things in Zope don't use it.
>
> Instead, the response information is aggregated, converted into a
> string, and then sent back all at once at the
Oliver Bleutgen wrote:
>
> Mod_perl also seems _not_ to stop a long running script if this script
> doesn't try to write to the RESPONSE (or whatever they call it). The
> perl test script I posted does write output, and this causes it to stop.
> If I try a script with no output, it never gets s
Chris Withers wrote:
> I know I'm late in on this thread, but I thought I'd throw in my views.
This is very nice, it seemed like nobody was interested in that.
> I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the
> stop button or the connection dies.
Yes, that would be the
I did try to put it there.
I didn't have account there.
What I got is: (sorry for the mass as I cut and paster from mozilla)
---
Site Error
An error was encounter while publishing this resource.
You are not authorized to access
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a question for you zope administrators out there :
> What are your experiences whith zope running on Windows NT/2K? No matter
> what I try , zope will run significant faster on a Unixlike system
> (with the same hardware), especially when working alo
I know I'm late in on this thread, but I thought I'd throw in my views.
I'd like to see the REQUEST be flat plain aborted when someone hits the stop
button or the connection dies.
I don't is the is context.REQUEST.RESPONSE.isClientConnected() really working.
How would I plug this in an expensiv
James Johnson wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> Is there a way to get the fszsqlmethod working on win32 with zope
> 2.5.1 and cmf1.2 or 1.3?
They work fine.
> I've placed dtml-comments around the sql.
Why? ;-)
> How
> do I supply the connection id?
I've just added docs:
http://cvs.zope.org/CMF/doc
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> code base. unfortunately, the semantics differ widely from the accepted
> standards for putting information like parameters at the top of the
> file. his syntax is all different :/
I find this comment quite annoying. What are these 'accepted standards' you
speak of? Whe
Yuan-Chen Cheng wrote:
> Patch to
>
> lib/python/TreeDisplay/TreeTag.py
>
> Zope 2.5.1
>
> So that when use virtual host monster, tree icon will appear.
Please put this in the collector so it doesn't get lost:
http://collector.zope.org/Zope
cheers,
Chris
__
25 matches
Mail list logo
