[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Change in repository approach to software sharing

Jim Fulton wrote: I think you'll find this doesn't work when svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/Zope3/trunk/src/ZConfig already exists. That's not relevent to the example, as, in the example, we are creating it for the first time. Yep, I know, but I've been there, and you feel great after the first tim

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug day report

Casey Duncan wrote: I will try to tread a little lighter on the Reject button and add a comment requesting clarification regardless of age. If I don't hear any for a month or so, then the bug will be closed. Great, don't suppose you can do a mind-meld with Andreas and Maik and get that point acros

[Zope-dev] Dis-allow anonymous bug posting?

Tim Peters wrote: While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that bug existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed to the Collectors, and read the email they generate). *bangs head against desk* Some bugs are so vaguely described nobody could guess -- and wh

Re: [Zope-dev] Weird "couldn't load state" on Zope 2.6.2

Dieter Maurer wrote: 2. Do you know any way of searching the list archvies that exclude the month.txt files? These are usually spurious due to being so large... Maybe, you try a different search engine. Maybe Gmane? Searching gmane.comp.web.zope.general for "dieter andreas load state" returned n

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

Ken Manheimer wrote: All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. Do we have to be this pedantic? "Wont' fix" says what it does, it's close enough to verb usage for me: "I won't fix that" verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't fix"? (While the distinction between "refuse

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

Ken Manheimer wrote: How is that better than what i implemented, "Refuse"? (Or maybe you missed that, since it's not in the excerpt context?) As the discussion has proceeded i'm becoming more convinced that "refuse" is fine... ...and I'm more convinced that "wont fix" is better. This is what So

Re: [Zope-dev] XML-RPC incorrect 404 return code

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO the xml-rpc error handling is a mess. You can't define your own standard_error_message like method, sometimes it returns html code, sets the status code to 200 even if there's an error, etc. Is there an intention to fix these in 2.X? You appear to have an itch... and

[Zope-dev] Re: Demonstration subversion repository created

Yves Moisan wrote: A bit off topic here : browsing the repository, I thought it would be nice if svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope3/trunk could be recognized as a protocol by Mozilla. http://protozilla.mozdev.org/ seb ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMA

Re: [Zope-dev] Dis-allow anonymous bug posting?

From: "Chris Withers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > How about removing the ability for people to post bugs withotu specifying n > email address? And, if they do specify an email address, using that to contact > them by sending notification mails to it? At least, warning them that bugs without email adress

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Zope 2.X Session problems

We're using a shopping cart model; sessions only get created if the user 'adds' a workshop to their cart. Unless there's anything I'm missing in Plone... the _ZopeId cookie doesn't seem to start up a session (lazy data container?) until a script actually creates says session['key'] = value... or

[Zope-dev] Re: Dis-allow anonymous bug posting?

On Fri, 07 May 2004 09:56:45 +0100 Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Peters wrote: > > > While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that > > bug existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed > > to the Collectors, and read the email they generate

[Zope-dev] Re: XML-RPC incorrect 404 return code

On Thu, 6 May 2004 22:30:49 -0500 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I reported this a few month ago with a patch and was told that it'll > be applied 'soon': > http://collector.zope.org/Zope/1175 Who told you that? I see no comment on that issue. > IMHO the xml-rpc error handling is a mess. You can'

[Zope-dev] RE: Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

On Thu, 6 May 2004, Tim Peters wrote: > [Ken Manheimer] > > All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. Can you > > suggest a verb the more clearly indicates the result is "won't > > fix"? > > Sorry, I got lost on the first sentence: what difference does it make to > anything whether

[Zope-dev] Re: Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

On Fri, 7 May 2004, Chris Withers wrote: > Ken Manheimer wrote: > > > All the actions are verbs, "won't fix" is not a verb. > > Do we have to be this pedantic? I wasn't meaning to be pedeantic. Sometimes inconsistencies in tense, grammatical form, etc, can make a web form unbeably confusing -

[Zope-dev] Re: Dis-allow anonymous bug posting?

On Fri, 7 May 2004, Casey Duncan wrote: > On Fri, 07 May 2004 09:56:45 +0100 > Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tim Peters wrote: > > > > > While that *should* be a good example, it isn't: I only knew that > > > bug existed because someone closed it on Bug Day (and I'm subscribed

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: XML-RPC incorrect 404 return code

On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 09:33, Casey Duncan wrote: > On Thu, 6 May 2004 22:30:49 -0500 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I reported this a few month ago with a patch and was told that it'll > > be applied 'soon': > > http://collector.zope.org/Zope/1175 > > Who told you that? I see no comment on th

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: The bleak Future of Zope?!

Hi, On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:04:34 +0200, Maik Jablonski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Zope2 isn't maintained very well anymore due to limited ressources(bug fixes, documentation, see mail from Andreas), but Zope3 isn'tproduction ready at all. So if you talk to people making the decisio

RE: [Zope-dev] XML-RPC incorrect 404 return code

> You appear to have an itch... and you know what open source > says about itches ;-) Then I will try to fix these issues, I just wasn't sure if anyone cares. Regards, Sandor ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/li

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: The bleak Future of Zope?!

--On Freitag, 7. Mai 2004 19:26 Uhr +0300 "Alex V. Koval" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just need to know if anybody else interested into better look of zope.org site? And how this could be done... Basically by volunteering to help out with the one or the task. See h

[Zope-dev] cvs.zope.org wedged, we're looking into it

cvs.zope.org is wedged - you can connect to it (ping, web, ssh) but not get any further. We've got a call in for attention, hopefully it'll be back available soon... Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org

Re: [Zope-dev] cvs.zope.org wedged, we're looking into it

On Friday 07 May 2004 01:50 pm, Ken Manheimer wrote: > cvs.zope.org is wedged - you can connect to it (ping, web, ssh) but not > get any further. We've got a call in for attention, hopefully it'll be > back available soon... Yay! It's working again! Ken, you're my hero. ;-) -Fred -- F

Re: [Zope-dev] RE: Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

Ken Manheimer wrote at 2004-5-7 09:42 -0400: > ... >It can sometimes pay off in workflow configuration to consistently pick >verbs that describe the actions in a generic way You can view "won't fix" as a verb, like in "we won't fix this bug". -- Dieter _

[Zope-dev] Re: RE: Re: [Collector] Strange reject policy

On Fri, 7 May 2004, Dieter Maurer wrote: > Ken Manheimer wrote at 2004-5-7 09:42 -0400: > > ... > >It can sometimes pay off in workflow configuration to consistently pick > >verbs that describe the actions in a generic way > > You can view "won't fix" as a verb, like in > > "we won't fix thi