Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
On 6 Nov 2005, at 03:41, Chris McDonough wrote: "configure" also allows you to install multiple times from a "pristine" source directory without changing the source directory, which I (and others, because they've told me they do) make use of. I use that a lot myself. -1 for removing it from me as well. jens ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
--On 5. November 2005 21:41:54 -0500 Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The makefile is a wrapper around setup.py as well as mkzopeinstance. It is also capable of creating release tarballs. -1 on removing configure / make / make install dance unless there is some reason to do so other than not being "pythonic". Also -1 from me. There was little need in the past to touch the script so it not a big burden from the maintenance point of view. It would be nice to have something similar Python-based as a replacement but that's nice2have. I can live perfectly with current solution. Andreas pgpvIvEzXZp6Y.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 12:14 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: > Lennart Regebro wrote: > > On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself. > > > > > > Farce? > > We aren't running the real configure. If you mean autotools, that's right, but only because we don't really need it. Compiling Python has already done all the dirty work for us, so configure's main job is to find a suitable Python, which it does. Configure also checks the Python it finds for large file support and Python's zlib module, which is required by some bits of Zope but not in every system-shipped Python. These things might seem silly to developers but they've saved a lot of new users from pain. "configure" also allows you to install multiple times from a "pristine" source directory without changing the source directory, which I (and others, because they've told me they do) make use of. > We aren't really using make. Actually we are. We create a makefile, which is run by make when you type "make" (no different than if autotools had created the makefile). > We're just using make as a wrapper around setup.py. The makefile is a wrapper around setup.py as well as mkzopeinstance. It is also capable of creating release tarballs. -1 on removing configure / make / make install dance unless there is some reason to do so other than not being "pythonic". - C ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
> I wasn't arguing that configure/make was hard to use. I'm arguing > that it's something extra to maintain and is just silly. > > It's main benefit is that it leverages a familiar pattern, but > I'm not convinced that it's worth it. Also, as tools like rpm and > deb become more widely used, I'm not sure how familar the configure/make > dance is. Other than Python and Zope, I never use configure/make anymore. My experience is that .rpm and .deb packages are poorly maintained, so if someone is serious about using Zope and related products, downloading and installing from source is the only way to go. We also have tools internally that depend on the configure/make dance, and I'm sure others who put up a lot of Zope instances do as well.. :) -Morten begin:vcard fn:Morten Petersen n:Petersen;Morten org:Nidelven IT adr:;;Postboks 923;Trondheim;;7409;Norway email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Project Manager tel;work:+47 45 44 00 69 tel;cell:+47 45 44 00 69 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.nidelven-it.no version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
On 11/5/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's main benefit is that it leverages a familiar pattern, but > I'm not convinced that it's worth it. Also, as tools like rpm and > deb become more widely used, I'm not sure how familar the configure/make > dance is. Other than Python and Zope, I never use configure/make anymore. I think more and more people never have to build from source. There's little I build from source these days, and I'm generally happy to build myself. I think the only things I build are things I'm actually contributing to myself, whether it be for work or volunteering on open source projects. I don't even build my own TeX tools any more. :-) Also, configure/make is only familiar in the Unix world; most installations appearantly are on Windows boxes using the binary installer. The importance of the familiar dance just isn't very significant any more. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. "Society attacks early, when the individual is helpless." --B.F. Skinner ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
Andreas Jung wrote: --On 4. November 2005 11:27:10 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Most people who download Zope 2 are not Python programmers. Many of them become Python programmers later. I think this is a big part of Zope 2's value proposition that we haven't matched in Zope 3 yet. Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself. I'd be happy to get rid of it. I'm also happy to defer to the vocal majority. Maybe it's worth revisiting this, which is why the provocative subject. :) Unless you have time enough I would keep it :-) Time enough for what? configure/make is just extra maintenance burden. > From my experience using configure was never a problem It was a problem this week. :) > - neither for newbies nor advanced Zope users. People unable to run "configure; make" are also likely unable to run any other kind of command to perform the same task. I wasn't arguing that configure/make was hard to use. I'm arguing that it's something extra to maintain and is just silly. It's main benefit is that it leverages a familiar pattern, but I'm not convinced that it's worth it. Also, as tools like rpm and deb become more widely used, I'm not sure how familar the configure/make dance is. Other than Python and Zope, I never use configure/make anymore. Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
Lennart Regebro wrote: On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself. Farce? We aren't running the real configure. We aren't really using make. We're just using make as a wrapper around setup.py. I'd be happy to get rid of it. I'm also happy to defer to the vocal majority. Maybe it's worth revisiting this, which is why the provocative subject. :) I read through this post and I don't grok what the suggested alternative is. Use the standard Python mechanism for installing things, for example, in a checkout: python setup.py build_ext -i Jim -- Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
On 11/5/05, Tino Wildenhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The usual setup.py from distutils to make it more pythonic. The install.py in the root of the distribution is actually a conventional setup.py. Would it be helpful to keep the setup.py name? We renamed it to encourage the configure/make dance, but that doesn't seem particularly helpful to me. (It would also simplify the zpkg implementation just a tiny bit to use the setup.py. name.) -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. "Society attacks early, when the individual is helpless." --B.F. Skinner ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
Am Samstag, den 05.11.2005, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Lennart Regebro: > On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself. > > Farce? > > > I'd be happy to get rid of it. I'm also happy to defer to the vocal > > majority. Maybe it's worth revisiting this, which is why the provocative > > subject. :) > > I read through this post and I don't grok what the suggested alternative is. > Could someone summarize? The usual setup.py from distutils to make it more pythonic. --Tino. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
--On 4. November 2005 11:27:10 -0500 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Most people who download Zope 2 are not Python programmers. Many of them become Python programmers later. I think this is a big part of Zope 2's value proposition that we haven't matched in Zope 3 yet. Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself. I'd be happy to get rid of it. I'm also happy to defer to the vocal majority. Maybe it's worth revisiting this, which is why the provocative subject. :) Unless you have time enough I would keep it :-) From my experience using configure was never a problem - neither for newbies nor advanced Zope users. People unable to run "configure; make" are also likely unable to run any other kind of command to perform the same task. -aj pgpGfWH6agHOo.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: Get rid of configure/make? (was Re: [Zope-dev] Re: SVN: Zope/trunk/ Merge philikon-zope32-integration branch. Basically, this branch entails:)
On 11/4/05, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having said that, I don't really like the configure/make farce myself. Farce? > I'd be happy to get rid of it. I'm also happy to defer to the vocal > majority. Maybe it's worth revisiting this, which is why the provocative > subject. :) I read through this post and I don't grok what the suggested alternative is. Could someone summarize? -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ ___ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
