I just discussed this with Jim and he concurs that it's a problem
within Zope, he gets the same results (old data) tunneling directly
to the app servers. I believe he's planning on investigating
further, but he's unavailable at the moment.
--Dave
Systems Administrator
Zope Corp.
540-361-17
Well, trying to figure out what's changed...that would be the first
thing I'd check; just verify that the rules are indeed hitting the
requests. How long has this problem been evident? When did the
changes
take place? I presume awhile ago?
Most of the changes would've been some time ago,
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 16:42 -0400, David Lawson wrote:
>
> It has, but mostly only in layout and some streamlining of the
> configuration. The basic rules you established are still in place,
> since we assumed you had good reasons for them. I haven't been
> following this discussion terri
It looks to me like the cache tier has been changed; IIRC zope.org was
not in the cache tier I setup for Managed Hostingand didn't
have (at
least) 4 cache servers in it's request flow.
Yes. The cache tier has changed significantly, but the basic
configuration is still the same.
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 10:09 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> I'm adding zope-web to the CC list.
> I wish you hadn't done that yet. If we keep changing things. it will
> be hard to figure this out.
>
> It would be helpful to show the results of, say wget -S, as in:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp$ wget
I'm adding zope-web to the CC list.
On May 20, 2007, at 1:42 PM, Mark W. Alexander wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2007, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Michael, I'm sorry I dropped the ball on this. I said I'd look into
it and got distracted.
Mark W. Alexander schrieb:
On Friday 18 May 2007,
Chris Withers wrote:
> Gaute Amundsen wrote:
>> Actually, I am starting to think there should be a big notice on the
>> frontpage of the http://www.zope.org/Documentation/ section saying:
>>
>> "don't bother with this, just read the source"
>
> There's actually some merit to this, anyone mind if I
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I made an attempt to document the hardware setup. I announced this
a long time ago. If you have the right privileges, you can:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/zope.org/system-documentation/trunk
I don't think it's up to date, but it does reflec
Jim Fulton wrote:
I made an attempt to document the hardware setup. I announced this
a long time ago. If you have the right privileges, you can:
svn co svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/zope.org/system-documentation/trunk
I don't think it's up to date, but it does reflect at least a partial
rea
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Actually, this is annoying. I increasingly find docs useless for this very
reason. I waste my time writing them. People bitch about them not being
there or not correct, and they actually never even look. It is documented -
and it's documented correctly.
I don't know ho
Chris Withers wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:17:02PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| >| >I don't think that's a CMF 'feature', unless the product is using
| >| >'contentValues()' which is part of the CMF API.
| | BTW, this doesn't mean anything to me.
I guess it doesn't.
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:17:02PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| >| >I don't think that's a CMF 'feature', unless the product is using
| >| >'contentValues()' which is part of the CMF API.
|
| BTW, this doesn't mean anything to me.
I guess it doesn't.
It did to me. I trie
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 04:17:02PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| >| >I don't think that's a CMF 'feature', unless the product is using
| >| >'contentValues()' which is part of the CMF API.
|
| BTW, this doesn't mean anything to me.
I guess it doesn't.
| >| >I'm sure that's an easy fix.
| >|
| >| C
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:50:32PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| >On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:25:11PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| >| - The product product has the *insane* policy that if any files aren't
| >| published, the entire product is inaccessib
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:50:32PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| >On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:25:11PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| >| - The product product has the *insane* policy that if any files aren't
| >| published, the entire product is inaccessible.
| >|
| >| Does any
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:25:11PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| - The product product has the *insane* policy that if any files aren't
| published, the entire product is inaccessible.
|
| Does anyone know how to fix this? Is there a knob for this somewhere in
| CMF?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:25:11PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
| - The product product has the *insane* policy that if any files aren't
| published, the entire product is inaccessible.
|
| Does anyone know how to fix this? Is there a knob for this somewhere in
| CMF?
I don't think that's a CMF
Andrew Sawyers wrote:
Ok guys.
I'm willing to eat a little crow on this one. I blame it on being on a lap
top on prone to mucho interruptions (excuse mode off). The condition for
this was actually more then the response I originally thought. When a
unauthorized page is accessed on zope.or
Andreas Jung wrote:
This would solve which problems?
We were in a state in which no one could download 2.8.3
using the widely available URLs. This is something we wrestled
with when we made the 3.0 release and I was sick of it.
We appear now to have this somewhat under control now.
Jim
And
We think we understand the problem now.
It is cache related.
We've changed the caching policy so that the pages in question aren't cached.
The problem ocurred because:
- The product product has the *insane* policy that if any files aren't
published, the entire product is inaccessible.
Doe
This would solve which problems?
Andreas
--On 19. Oktober 2005 14:04:23 -0400 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm inclined to make the Zope 2, Zope 3, and possibly the ZODB release
areas
totally static. This would mean that making a new release would require
using the ZMI to create a su
I'm inclined to make the Zope 2, Zope 3, and possibly the ZODB release areas
totally static. This would mean that making a new release would require
using the ZMI to create a subfolder (e.g. for 2.8.3) and editing some number
of pages by hand.
Any objections?
Anybody wanna help?
Jim
Jim Fulto
For now, I've edited the Products page, http://www.zope.org/Products/
to havs static links to the 2.8.3 windows and source releases. I don't
know if this is good enough. If it isn't, let me know and I'll try to hack more
pages. Sigh.
Jim
Chris Withers wrote:
Is there nothing we can help Andrea
Chris Withers wrote:
Is there nothing we can help Andreas to do to purge the caches when he
does a release so Michael doesn't have to deal with everyone who gets
the "insufficient priveleges" message?
I'd be happy to help if there are instructions on how to.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailt
24 matches
Mail list logo
