>The idea is to make a semi-high horsepower engine mod for the everyday
>driver that wouldn't require changing the stock internals. At roughtly
>180-190hp (with IMMEDIATE boost) this would make our car fun to drive,
>and much cheaper than the turbo.
>

Correct me if Im wrong, but isn't a turbocharged engine more thermally 
efficient than a supercharged engine. This would mean that a turbo  converts 
your chemical energy, (gas), into work, (hp) at a better rate than a 
supercharger.The plus side being you would use less gas to achieve the same 
level of power output in a turbocharged engine compared to that of a 
supercharged engine. The negative side being that you would have to wait for 
the power since it is not (IMMEDIATE boost). They are many other pro's and 
con's to consider too. just throwing in my $.02

So we will have two choices in the near future right? Hotshot is developing 
a TURBO KIT and u guys are developing a SUPERCHARGER. This is great u have 
my support, now everyone will have a choice as to what kind of power they 
want on tap!

One more ?. What is the reliability of a turbocharged engine compared to a 
supercharged one?

javier
97 200sx without forced induction, for now.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.




Reply via email to