>
>You know, personally, I don't think this applies anymore. Turbo's built a
>bad rap in the old days when they weren't half as efficient as they are
>now.
> If you've ever ridden or driven a properly designed turboed car, there
>really is no waiting for boost. Stock DET's with a T25 or T28 have very
>little lag because they are OEM from the factory. They are designed this
>way. They get boost around 1500-2000 rpms. Is that lag for you guys?
>
Ive never driven or riden in a turboed car, so I don't really know what
"lag" is. I was just saying that if I had a choice, i would go with the
turbo setup cause it is more efficient than a supercharged setup and I think
this outweighs any cons that a turbo has. I think i read somewhere that
superchargers increase hp throughout the entire powerband, is this correct?
javier
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
