Hi All, Just take a look of this new policy suggested and I know this is still in discussion stage. First at all, my business don't have any IP leasing business in APNIC region. And majorly my business is doing hosting business, and now I'm sitting in RIPE region (UK) for my business.
For my view of this new policy as below: (1) Is that RIPE really have this kind of policy? Which one? (This policy suggested RIPE have this kind of policy?) I cannot see it the same thing in RIPE of our membership account. (2) If leasing is not allowed, is that mean small business (New hosting / ISP) won't be able to get the new IPv4 address from leasing market? Or they just can buy it at high cost from second market? (3) The policy suggested that there need to have "direct connection", is that mean GRE/VPN is also not included? How about if some customers in mainland China, they would like to get virtual Internet address from outside(mainly HK) in some case? (4) Any new solution for new comer to apply IPv4 direct from APNIC? If no, what they can do? Hope someone can answer of above questions. Thank you, Ernest Tse Lu Heng <[email protected]> 於 2022年9月9日 週五 下午4:13寫道： > Aftab: > > Any of APNIC document can not be outside scope of law. > > Or you suggesting that clause will except APNIC from rule of law? > > On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 16:01, Aftab Siddiqui <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Lu, >> >> On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 16:35, Lu Heng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Andrew: >>> >>> No, I did not say the registrar has no power to enforce its own contract. >>> >>> I am saying the power in such a contract is very limited. >>> >>> And policies being made here can not dump out of legal limitation of a >>> contract. >>> >> >> IANAL, but just for your information. >> >> Membership Agreement >> The Member must: >> 3.2 (d) Comply with this agreement and all APNIC Documents. >> >> All policies once approved and implemented become part of the APNIC >> documents and that's why they become part of the membership agreement. >> >> Anyways, we were discussing the merit of the policy on technical and >> operational grounds not on political grounds or business interest. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Aftab A. Siddiqui >> >> > > -- > -- > Kind regards. > Lu > > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
