This is totally false information.

Try to Leasing IP addresses in AfriNic or LACNIC and see what will happen with the resources you are responsible for. And for ARIN try to justify the need for the resources saying they will be leased and see what will happen.

Fernando

On 09/09/2022 07:01, Lu Heng wrote:
Hi Ernest:

RIPE, ARIN,AFRINIC does not have any of the similar policy.

Due to language barriers, I am not familiar with LACINIC.



On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 17:51, ERNEST TSE <[email protected]> wrote:

    Hi All,

    Just take a look of this new policy suggested and I know this is
    still in discussion stage.
    First at all, my business don't have any IP leasing business in
    APNIC region. And majorly my business is doing hosting business,
    and now I'm sitting in RIPE region (UK) for my business.

    For my view of this new policy as below:
    (1) Is that RIPE really have this kind of policy? Which one? (This
    policy suggested RIPE have this kind of policy?) I cannot see it
    the same thing in RIPE of our membership account.
    (2) If leasing is not allowed, is that mean small business (New
    hosting / ISP) won't be able to get the new IPv4 address from
    leasing market? Or they just can buy it at high cost from second
    market?
    (3) The policy suggested that there need to have "direct
    connection", is that mean GRE/VPN is also not included? How about
    if some customers in mainland China, they would like to get
    virtual Internet address from outside(mainly HK) in some case?
    (4) Any new solution for new comer to apply IPv4 direct from
    APNIC? If no, what they can do?

    Hope someone can answer of above questions.

    Thank you,
    Ernest Tse

    Lu Heng <[email protected]> 於 2022年9月9日 週五 下午4:13寫道:

        Aftab:

        Any of APNIC document can not be outside scope of law.

        Or you suggesting that clause will except APNIC from rule of law?

        On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 16:01, Aftab Siddiqui
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            Hi Lu,

            On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 16:35, Lu Heng
            <[email protected]> wrote:

                Hi Andrew:

                No, I did not say the registrar has no power to
                enforce its own contract.

                I am saying the power in such a contract is very limited.

                And policies being made here can not dump out of legal
                limitation of a contract.


            IANAL, but just for your information.

            Membership Agreement
            The Member must:
            3.2 (d) Comply with this agreement and all APNIC Documents.

            All policies once approved and implemented become part of
            the APNIC documents and that's why they become part of the
            membership agreement.

            Anyways, we were discussing the merit of the policy on
            technical and operational grounds not on political grounds
            or business interest.


            Regards,

            Aftab A. Siddiqui



-- --
        Kind regards.
        Lu

        _______________________________________________
        sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
        To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

    _______________________________________________
    sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
    To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]



--
--
Kind regards.
Lu


_______________________________________________
sig-policy -https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
_______________________________________________
sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to