Hi Marco,

 

Small clarification from our side. We actually checked this with the policy 
officer around March-April-May 2022, if I recall correctly.

 

What we got from that email exchange was that "leasing" is not defined, but 
also was not explicitly allowed neither disallowed as a valid justification.

 

The point is that with the waiting list there is just a form and no 
justification is provided, you just confirm your intention to make assignments 
within 2 years and that at least one active network element in the network is 
active in the RIPE NCC service region to qualify for a single /24.

 

The point is if we were to ask for a justification, I don’t see how come I will 
be able to say “I will not make assignments, but lease addresses”, right? 
Otherwise, we should say that it is the wild west, really ugly.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 12/9/22, 10:39, "Marco Schmidt" <[email protected]> escribió:

 

Hello Ernest and colleagues,

I would like to provide some clarification for the RIPE region.

The proposal states
--------------
In other RIRs, the leasing of addresses is not authorized either and since it 
is not explicit in their policy manuals either, this proposal will be presented 
as well.

Nothing is currently mentioned in RIPE about this and it is not acceptable as a 
justification of the need. [...]
--------------

In the RIPE region the term "leasing" is not defined and therefore it does not 
play a role in the request evaluation. 
Further, the RIPE policies for IPv4 do not require any specific justification 
of the need.

Before providing a statement about the policy status in the RIPE region, I 
kindly suggest that proposers contact first our Policy Officer ([email protected]) 
for input.

Kind regards,
Marco Schmidt
Manager Registration Services & Policy Development
RIPE NCC

On 09/09/2022 18:01, Lu Heng wrote:

Hi Ernest: 

 

RIPE, ARIN,AFRINIC does not have any of the similar policy.

 

Due to language barriers, I am not familiar with LACINIC.

 

 

 

On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 17:51, ERNEST TSE <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi All, 

 

Just take a look of this new policy suggested and I know this is still in 
discussion stage.

First at all, my business don't have any IP leasing business in APNIC region. 
And majorly my business is doing hosting business, and now I'm sitting in RIPE 
region (UK) for my business.

 

For my view of this new policy as below:

(1) Is that RIPE really have this kind of policy? Which one? (This policy 
suggested RIPE have this kind of policy?) I cannot see it the same thing in 
RIPE of our membership account.

(2) If leasing is not allowed, is that mean small business (New hosting / ISP) 
won't be able to get the new IPv4 address from leasing market? Or they just can 
buy it at high cost from second market?

(3) The policy suggested that there need to have "direct connection", is that 
mean GRE/VPN is also not included? How about if some customers in mainland 
China, they would like to get virtual Internet address from outside(mainly HK) 
in some case?

(4) Any new solution for new comer to apply IPv4 direct from APNIC? If no, what 
they can do?

 

Hope someone can answer of above questions.

 

Thank you,

Ernest Tse

 

Lu Heng <[email protected]> 於 2022年9月9日 週五 下午4:13寫道:

Aftab: 

 

Any of APNIC document can not be outside scope of law.

 

Or you suggesting that clause will except APNIC from rule of law?

 

On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 16:01, Aftab Siddiqui <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Lu,
 

On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 16:35, Lu Heng <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Andrew: 

 

No, I did not say the registrar has no power to enforce its own contract.

 

I am saying the power in such a contract is very limited.

 

And policies being made here can not dump out of legal limitation of a contract.

 

IANAL, but just for your information.

 

Membership Agreement

The Member must:

3.2 (d) Comply with this agreement and all APNIC Documents. 

 

All policies once approved and implemented become part of the APNIC documents 
and that's why they become part of the membership agreement. 

 

Anyways, we were discussing the merit of the policy on technical and 
operational grounds not on political grounds or business interest. 

 

 

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui

 


 

-- 

--
Kind regards.
Lu

_______________________________________________
sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]


 

-- 

--
Kind regards.
Lu



_______________________________________________
sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ sig-policy - 
https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe send an 
email to [email protected]



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

_______________________________________________
sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to