singularity  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation gts
  • Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation Jef Allbright
• [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Mitchell Porter
  • RE: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Stathis Papaioannou
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Eugen Leitl
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Bruce LaDuke
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe John Ku
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Stathis Papaioannou
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe John Ku
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Stathis Papaioannou
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Russell Wallace
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe deering
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Bruce LaDuke
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Mitchell Porter
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Stathis Papaioannou
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe John Ku
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Mitchell Porter
  • [singularity] Uselessness of AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Uselessness of AIXI Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Uselessness of AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Uselessness of AIXI Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Uselessness of AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Uselessness of AIXI Richard Loosemore
  • [singularity] Ethical code to prevent humans abusing robots Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe John Ku
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Eugen Leitl
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Russell Wallace
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Charles D Hixson
  • [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Russell Wallace
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Shane Legg
  • RE: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Peter Voss
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Shane Legg
  • RE: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Peter Voss
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Cenny Wenner
  • [singularity] Comments on AIXI and ad hominem innuendo in defense of it Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe deering
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Matt Mahoney
  • [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Keta Meme
• [singularity] Short singularity video Chuck Esterbrook
• [singularity] Transhumanist w/ Goertzel (in SF, Feb 27) Bruce Klein
• [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension? Bruce Klein
  • Re: [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension? Bruce Klein
  • [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension? Joel Pitt
  • Re: [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension? Stephen Reed
  • Re: [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension? Bruce LaDuke
  • Re: [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension? Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Poll = AGI Motivation / Life Extension? Stathis Papaioannou
• [singularity] Vinge & Goerzel = Uplift Academy's Good Ancestor Principle Workshop 2007 Bruce Klein
  • Re: [singularity] Vinge & Goerzel = Uplift Academy's Good Ancestor Principle Workshop 2007 Joshua Fox
  • Re: [singularity] Vinge & Goerzel = Uplift Academy's Good Ancestor Principle Workshop 2007 Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Vinge & Goerzel = Uplift Academy's Good Ancestor Principle Workshop 2007 Shane Legg
  • Re: [singularity] Vinge & Goerzel = Uplift Academy's Good Ancestor Principle Workshop 2007 Anna Taylor
• [singularity] Chaitin randomness gts
  • Re: [singularity] Chaitin randomness Benjamin Goertzel
• [singularity] BBC on AI Joshua Fox
• [singularity] Storytelling, empathy and AI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Storytelling, empathy and AI Lúcio de Souza Coelho
• [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Joshua Fox
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Bo Morgan
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Joshua Fox
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Josh Treadwell
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Hank Conn
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Joshua Fox
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Chuck Esterbrook
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Chuck Esterbrook
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Ten years to the Singularity ?? Russell Wallace
• [singularity] Goertzel meets Sirius Ben Goertzel
• [singularity] DC Future Salon - Metaverse Roadmap - Weds Nov 8, 7-9 PM Ben Goertzel
• [singularity] Fwd: "After Life" by Simon Funk Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Fwd: "After Life" by Simon Funk Chris Norwood
  • Re: [singularity] Fwd: "After Life" by Simon Funk Matt Mahoney
• [singularity] Animal rights Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [singularity] Animal rights Lúcio de Souza Coelho
• [singularity] Language processing Matt Mahoney
• [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Hank Conn
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Russell Wallace
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Russell Wallace
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Russell Wallace
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Joel Pitt
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Chuck Esterbrook
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Russell Wallace
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Neil H.
  • Re: Re: Re: [singularity] Kurzweil vs. de Garis - You Vote! Russell Wallace
  • [singularity] AGIRI's 3rd Workshop Bruce J. Klein
• RE: [singularity] RE: the musical singularity -- OOPS! pjmanney
• [singularity] RE: the musical singularity pjmanney
  • Re: [singularity] RE: the musical singularity Mark Nuzzolilo II
  • Re: [singularity] RE: the musical singularity Joel Pitt
• [singularity] AGI funding: US versus China Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] AGI funding: US versus China Josh Treadwell
  • Re: [singularity] AGI funding: US versus China Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] AGI funding: US versus China Starglider
• [singularity] Singularity Definition Bruce LaDuke
• [singularity] Historical Simulations PETER JENKINS
  • Re: [singularity] Historical Simulations deering
• RE: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? (resend) Jef Allbright
• [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Chris Norwood
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Chris Norwood
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Charles D Hixson
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Joel Pitt
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Lúcio de Souza Coelho
  • RE: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Jef Allbright
  • Re: [singularity] Minds beyond the Singularity: literally self-less ? Nathan Barna
• [singularity] Defining the Singularity Michael Anissimov
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Hank Conn
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity BillK
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Bruce LaDuke
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Lúcio de Souza Coelho
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Hank Conn
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Lúcio de Souza Coelho
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Nathan Barna
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Richard Leis
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Samantha  Atkins
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity deering
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Michael Anissimov
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Samantha Atkins
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Michael Anissimov
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity deering
  • Re: [singularity] Defining the Singularity Samantha Atkins

• Earlier messages
• Later messages