On 08/31/2017 02:37, Michael Cooper wrote: > Thanks for the quick response > > Okay, So I thought a Class C was 255.255.255.0, I must be missing > something sorry.
What he no doubt is referring to is where you wrote: ip: 192.168.x.x and then gave it a mask of 255.255.255.0 rather than 255.255.0.0 I at least read your x to mean 0 as in 192.168.0. which would be more common. (There certainly is no security reason to hide your RFC1918 IP's, unlike routeable IP's.) The notes are a bit confusing with the variations of the x's. Some have 1, 2 and even 3 x's, much better to give exact details. Now if all IPs actually are on the same subnet then you clearly have a different issue. Can you clarify why you think having a second NIC would help? -- Steve ------------------------------------------- smartos-discuss Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
