This is all fine, but I though I was replying to a situation of skipping over the basics, you can't ignore the existence of DG if you're going to do something procedurally. I didn't reply at the correct place in the thread, sorry for the confusion.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Raffaele Fragapane <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry Luce-Eric, I have to disagree with this, and I find your examples > defeat your own argument.
