Graham dont take it personal. It's maya... We don't like it, we probably will need a lot of time to start accepting it and maybe at some point some here gonna agree that what maya offers is good.
But right now, the cons of maya are just hitting artists day in day out ;) 2014-09-10 2:35 GMT+02:00 Jason S <[email protected]>: > On 09/09/14 17:29, Graham Bell wrote: > >> Personally, I thought I did a great job, but if you guys want to spin it >> into something it wasn’t, I guess that’s your prerogative. >> >> G >> > > Oh didn't know you had a take on that event. > > But no doubt yourself and everyone (many well known names) did a great job, > and nothing suggests it was a bad event in any way, well to the contrary! > > It actually looked very informative and like a great opportunity to > objectively assess how thing were with lots of perspective with many users > very well versed with their tools. > > Which seems to have been a success at doing just that, in a candid and > positive setting, > > > But if the resulting seemingly very fair, accurate and impartial report > also confirms a number of things > (almost everything) we all knew already (both pros & cons), > I wouln't associate the highlighting of these things to 'spinning'. > > I don't think anything suggested here has been unfair, out of place, or > not the case. > > .. except maybe the 'killing the wrong product' bit.. cause in NO > circumstance could there ever be any justification to *forcibly* prevent > ANY fairly widely used product from being used, regardless if (but > -especially- if) that product was unique. (pretty darn unique in this case) > > > >
