Hi Sheng, Thanks very much for letting us know you are going to implement 4rd-u. Please share the results in the ML. I am very much interested to see how 4rd-u would cause any conflict in IPv6.
Thanks, Yiu From: Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 00:47:36 +0000 To: Maoke <[email protected]>, Softwires-wg <[email protected]> Cc: Yong Cui <[email protected]>, Ralph Droms <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Softwires] Path to move forward with 4rd Without any prejudgement, we are going to implement 4rd-u and do operational tests. If there are any architecture conflict with the basic IPv6 archtecture, we would like to propose modification for 4rd-u design. In principle, we have no any interests to change the current IPv6 architecture at all. We will make sure it is a transition mechanism to help current IPv6 getting deployed, rather than another IP. Best regards, Sheng
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
