2012/4/2 Rémi Després <despres.r...@laposte.net> > > but it is less informative. > > > Less informative than what? >
well i found that, through the ietf agenda page: http://www.ietf.org/jabber/logs/softwire/2012-03-30.html, FYI. less informative than my email discussions. > > if the unified header mapping wg or BoF is started, i will contribute a > comprehensive, and well-studied list of questions. > > > A WG now without a previous BOF is of course completely unrealistic. > > If this is to say that until a BOF is started, you will keep your > objection(s) unknown, I continue to take it as a lack of identified > objections. > Fair enough? > i din't say what if the BoF is not started but only said about what if the BoF would started. ;-) best, maoke > > Cheers, > RD >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
