Totally agree with Maoke.

As one of the developers for the MAP design team, I think it's unfair
to put both MAP and 4rd-u as experimental. It's good to see the
attempt to implement 4rd-u. However, any discussion about
standardization should be postponed until it is coded, deployed and
fully tested.

Regards,
Wentao

2012/4/1 Maoke <fib...@gmail.com>:
> hi all,
>
> i listented to the softwire wg live on March 30 online and recorded my
> comments in the jabber room. as the person who was mentioned by the
> presenter not less than twice, i have to point out that it is unfair that
> the presenter mentioned me with only acknowledgment to my effort but my
> point of views. my summerized comment on 4rd-u is: it is flawed in both
> architecture and technical aspects, and now still uncertain in several
> details.
>
> it would become as a ridiculous and weird record in the  ietf history, had
> the wg made a decision of putting two as experimental, one is
> well-understood, well-coded and well-practised while the other is misleading
> the understanding on the Internet architecture, not yet coded, not yet
> tested by any operators.
>
> our company, as an ISP and as a provider doing also application services,
> including those over mobile platforms, is waiting for the MAP standard
> desirably. we have no interest in introducing the 4rd-u elements into our
> platforms.
>
> personally i won't code a stuff with obvious architectural flaws but, if i
> were believing in the 4rd-u, i would do the code and operational test with
> serious self-checking as MAP-T and MAP-E teams already have done, before
> talking on any doc-track issue with the community. this is the way of being
> responsible.
>
> thanks,
> maoke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>



-- 
Wentao Shang

Master Candidate and Research Assistant at CERNET Center & NGN Lab, EE
Department, Tsinghua University
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to