well, let's see the other way around: what is the problem of publishing the two documents now?So that they are stable and have a RFC number. Then any implementer can implement based on the RFC. Providers can request their manufacturers to have a product which conforms to the RFC.
Marc. Le 2012-04-03 à 14:56, Wojciech Dec a écrit : > The irony is that this is an apples and oranges comparison, and throwing away > ripe apples into some box with raw oranges looks rather unfair. > > Some of the of the indicators are: > - MAP is not only the result of a consensus of a broad WG design team, but > also that of numerous authors of the merged drafts whihc have been discussed > for 1 year+. The 4rd-u technical proposals were evaluated by the design team, > and have not gained support there. > - MAP running code exist > - 4rd-U covers a technical corner case that is "self created" (if not self > invented/motivated) > - 4rd-U does not allow v4-v6 communication (say a v4 host to a v6 sign-up > portal, etc) > - 4rd-U is not by any means "universal". As admitted it requires the coupling > with BIH, which features the same technical corner case that 4rd-u claims to > solve (doh). > > The other aspect is that some different measure appears to be being applied > in this selection *for WG adoption* vs the selection of the other drafts in > softwire, which have gained WG draft status without even a shred of running > code. > > -Woj. > > On 3 April 2012 18:32, Marc Blanchet <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see a way out of this thread. > > my suggestion: > - published both as experimental > - let the market decide > - come back later to move one or the other standard track. > > Above all, I think having a stable specification (i.e. RFC) that implementers > can code against and providers to require is what is needed first. > > Marc. > > Le 2012-04-03 à 11:14, Jan Zorz @ go6.si a écrit : > > > Dear Softwires WG chairs. > > > > For how long will you leave this useless cockfight go on instead of > > steering the working group into a direction, that may enable us to decide > > on something and chose the direction? > > > > We are running in circles here and just amplificating the noise, coming > > from certain usual suspects. > > > > Cheers, Jan > > > > P.S: I too enjoy observing the roosters fight, but I don't think we have > > time for this now. :) > > _______________________________________________ > > Softwires mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
