2012-04-03 18:32, Marc Blanchet : > I don't see a way out of this thread. > > my suggestion: > - published both as experimental > - let the market decide > - come back later to move one or the other standard track.
+1 RD > > Above all, I think having a stable specification (i.e. RFC) that implementers > can code against and providers to require is what is needed first. > > Marc. > > Le 2012-04-03 à 11:14, Jan Zorz @ go6.si a écrit : > >> Dear Softwires WG chairs. >> >> For how long will you leave this useless cockfight go on instead of steering >> the working group into a direction, that may enable us to decide on >> something and chose the direction? >> >> We are running in circles here and just amplificating the noise, coming from >> certain usual suspects. >> >> Cheers, Jan >> >> P.S: I too enjoy observing the roosters fight, but I don't think we have >> time for this now. :) >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> Softwires@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
