Here's the situation. There was no clear consensus in the WG meeting in Paris. But the IETF conducts its business on the mailing list, so - as we always do - the chairs asked for feedback on the two questions asked in Paris. We'll use the responses to assess if there is consensus for the choices in each of those questions.
- Ralph On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:52 PM 4/4/12, Maoke wrote: > > > 2012/4/4 Marc Blanchet <marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca> > Le 2012-04-03 à 22:25, Maoke a écrit : >> >> a serious point not of the Apr-1 joke: as an IETF WG, we are obliged to >> provide surely high-quality document to the market. even we believe market >> choice, at least we have to publish what we ourselves have well understood, >> carefully coded and well tested. >> otherwise, the market would see IETF more of a group of doc-makers rather >> than technology-explorers. > > agreed. then what do we do in the absence of consensus? I proposed one > solution. > > i propose another, maybe closer to the chairs' opinion: let's do the vote and > decide with the game rule of "majority wins", stopping the endless vote. ;-) > - maoke > > > Marc. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
