I didn't check there was a newer version. My bad. On 6/28/12 9:28 AM, "Tomek Mrugalski" <tomasz.mrugal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 28.06.2012 14:17, Lee, Yiu wrote: >> Hi Woj and Satoru, >> >> Thanks for spending time to explain MAP to the ML. It really helps to >> understand it better. Thanks >> >> I concur with Maoke's analysis. If the 1:1 mode means giving the CE a >> complete IPv4 address (or an IPv4 prefix) in the Rule IPv4 prefix (i.e. >> EA-bit=0 and r <= 32) , this is what MAP allows. If 1:1 means explicitly >> provisioning PSID in the BR for shared an IPv4 address and PSID isn't >> contained in the CE MAP address, AFAIK this is not MAP originally >> designed for. >> >> In the current version of the draft, I found two references: >Sorry for interrupting, but which current version do you referring to? >There is softwire-map-01 published earlier today with the 1:1 mode >removed. > >Cheers, >Tomek >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >Softwires@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
