Looks like the official Spanning Sync solution is not what I'd hoped for. If you guys were gonna punt, you could have told us that a long time ago. Why tell us you were working on a solution you couldn't deliver? I bought a lifetime license (2 actually) in the product's early days because of what Spanning Sync did, not because of where my data was stored, or what Apple was doing, or Google was doing. Spanning Sync fixed things. It was the middle man who made it all work. It enabled me to have what I wanted: bidirectional sync between Apple's calendaring solution and Google's calendaring solution. Now you say choose. If I wanted to choose, frankly, I'd never have needed Spanning Sync. I get to go from elegant to worrying about whether a calendar is hosted locally or not.
http://blog.spanningsync.com/2011/04/update-spanning-sync-and-the-new-mobileme-calendars.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Fspanningsync+%28Spanning+Sync+Blog%29 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en.
